Alright R3v,.........

[george graves]

Lexus is300

[Devil Inc]

^^Good Choice^^

[alexw]

I second (or third/forth) the Civic Si/Integra comments, as well as a WRX...

[JasonC]

I guess i'll say what i usually say. A 4th gen f-body.

[James]

1996 Range Rover 4.6 HSE!

[HST]

MB 190E

Done

[325_e30]

DC2 b18c5 98' preferably. man i miss my old car. cheap turbo setup and some random internals and you got yourself a reliable fast daily.

[e30pwr]

I concur with the opinion of "Whatever daddy buys you"

its my money, not his so i do have a good bit of say.

Lexus is300

that would be one I haven't thought of yet.


I know most of you go to vwvortex or at least some of you, how reliable are the mk4 vr6 gti's?

[Nic01101011]

no MkIV VWs

[325_e30]

how reliable are the mk4 vr6 gti's?

I loved mine. Never really had any problems with it. I took it in every 3.5k miles for tune though. Handled like a champ.

[Philipangoo]

id go with the bugeye WRX. Cheap on maintenance if u dont push ridiculous boost without upgrading the right parts. Also in teh 10k ballpark range. 10k gets u a very nice one.

[nando]

[T3rd Ferguson]

mk4 is heavy but somewhat powerful. FWD is annoying. the VR is basically untunable unless you have big bucks. tail lights and headlights always burn out. radios always die.

6 of my friends have mk4s and i am just going by what they tell me/what i have observed on my own.

I've driven a BUNCH of them and would reccomend the 1.8T if i HAD to get one. plus they're cheaper, so you can sink that extra money right into making it a BAMF

[e30pwr]

Hopefully, I'll end up with a DD car and a 2006 r6 to ride for fun and on good days. I can handle FWD for a DD.

If the mk4's have light problems it cant be worse than a volvo and their head/tail's issues. I was given tails for my old mans s60 t5 when the guy found out i had been in the store a week earlier.

[BayareaE30]

MKIII Toyota Supra Turbo =)