Seperated@Birth? NWS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mtriple
    replied
    Originally posted by hugh jass
    i have seen steve's face more time than i care to remember. that first pic is definitely not him. steve's cheeks are rounder and his nose is bigger. plus the glasses on the guy in the first pic are not thick enough.
    Carly, should I post up the Gay Person Weekly cover shot with Biscus?

    Leave a comment:


  • hugh jass
    replied
    i have seen steve's face more time than i care to remember. that first pic is definitely not him. steve's cheeks are rounder and his nose is bigger. plus the glasses on the guy in the first pic are not thick enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mtriple
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Maluco
    replied
    oh man, redeem yourselves!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • atomic
    replied
    Looks like it might be Blunt just before his somewhat recent weight loss he had...


    :zzz:

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon325i
    replied
    Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber



    blunt - Verified...
    Separated at birth?

    Leave a comment:


  • kronus
    replied
    Also looks too young to be blunt.

    Leave a comment:


  • kronus
    replied
    first

    Leave a comment:


  • Farbin Kaiber
    started a poll Seperated@Birth? NWS

    Seperated@Birth? NWS

    119
    Yes
    51.26%
    61
    No
    11.76%
    14
    Rob
    36.97%
    44
    So, amidst my super post whoring abilities on 26 various forums, (automotive, star wars, crochet/cross-stitch, bicycles, etc.) I see a beavy of images. I found this image of a guy making a sexy pose in a photobucket. I thought he looked familiar. I found the second one, and posted to see what you guys think...


    Web Image - Unverified.



    blunt - Verified...
    Last edited by Farbin Kaiber; 12-14-2008, 02:31 PM.
Working...