Isreal bomb Gaza, killing 195

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by parkerbink
    Learn to spell.


    Suck my dick.

    Leave a comment:


  • parkerbink
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    Oh no, you deffinately are. What do you call demolition of Palestinian homes. That is Occupied land...I need a drill for your thick skull.

    Learn to spell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chisum
    replied
    BREAKING NEWS: Joshh talks PEACE in the MIDDLE EAST

    "Israel must be wiped off the map … The establishment of a Zionist regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Islamic world . . . The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of the war of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land."

    "The Zionist regime is an injustice and by its very nature a permanent threat. Whether you like it or not, the Zionist regime is heading toward annihilation. The Zionist regime is a rotten, dried tree that will be eliminated by one storm."

    "Today, they [Europeans] have created a myth in the name of Holocaust and consider it to be above God, religion and the prophets … This is our proposal: give a part of your own land in Europe, the United States, Canada or Alaska to them [Jews] so that the Jews can establish their country."

    "The Zionist regime is the flag bearer of violation and occupation and this regime is the flag of Satan. …It is not unlikely that this regime be on the path to dissolution and deterioration when the philosophy behind its creation and survival is invalid."

    "A new Middle East will prevail without the existence of Israel."

    "In parallel to the official political war there is a hidden war going on and the Islamic states should benefit from their economic potential to cut off the hands of the enemies."

    "Some European countries insist on saying that Hitler killed millions of innocent Jews in furnaces.... Although we don't accept this claim, if we suppose it is true, our question for the Europeans is: Is the killing of innocent Jewish people by Hitler the reason for their support to the occupiers of Jerusalem? If the Europeans are honest they should give some of their provinces in Europe -- like in Germany, Austria or other countries -- to the Zionists and the Zionists can establish their state in Europe."

    "The Zionists are the true manifestation of Satan . . . Many Western governments that claim to be pioneers of democracy and standard bearers of human rights close their eyes over crimes committed by the Zionists and by remaining silent support the Zionists due to their hedonistic and materialistic tendencies."

    "Thanks to people's wishes and God's will the trend for the existence of the Zionist regime is downwards and this is what God has promised and what all nations want…Just as the Soviet Union was wiped out and today does not exist, so will the Zionist regime soon be wiped out"

    "Though the enemy had made preparations for not allowing Iran (president) to make his voice heard, but, they could not succeed and thanks to grace of God the world people heard our voice."

    "Zionists are people without any religion. They are lying about being Jewish because religion means brotherhood, friendship and respecting other divine religions…They are an organized minority who have infiltrated the world. They are not even a 10,000-strong organization."

    "With God's help, the countdown button for the destruction of the Zionist regime has been pushed by the hands of the children of Lebanon and Palestine . . . By God's will, we will witness the destruction of this regime in the near future."

    "Although the main solution is for the elimination of the Zionist regime, at this stage an immediate cease-fire must be implemented."

    "No Muslim nation would put up with this entity [i.e. Israel] in Islamic lands, not for one moment … If it's true that the [Europeans] committed a big crime in World War II, then they must take responsibility for it themselves, and not ask the Palestinian people to pay the price … Those countries that support this regime [Israel] were terrified at the suggestion that [Israel] should be relocated to their neighborhood. So why should the Palestinians and the countries in our region accept this entity?"

    "Iran's enemies know your courage, faith and commitment to Islam and the land of Iran has created a powerful army that can powerfully defend the political borders and the integrity of the Iranian nation and cut off the hand of any aggressor and place the sign of disgrace on their forehead."

    "Soon Islam will become the dominating force in the world, occupying first place in the number of followers amongst all other religions."

    "What is important is that they have shown the way to martyrdom which we must follow.''

    "Is there a craft more beautiful, more sublime, more divine, than the craft of giving yourself to martyrdom and becoming holy? Do not doubt, Allah will prevail, and Islam will conquer mountain tops of the entire world."

    "Our revolution's main mission is to pave the way for the reappearance of the Twelfth Imam, the Mahdi."

    "We don't shy away from declaring that Islam is ready to rule the world."

    "By the grace of Allah, we (will be) a nuclear power."

    "If you have burned the Jews, why don't you give a piece of Europe, the United States, Canada or Alaska to Israel. Our question is, if you have committed this huge crime, why should the innocent nation of Palestine pay for this crime?"

    "Are they human beings?... They (Zionists) are a group of blood-thirsty savages putting all other criminals to shame."

    "The Zionists and their protectors are the most detested people in all of humanity, and the hatred is increasing every day."

    ''We say that this fake regime (Israel) cannot logically continue to live. Open the doors (of Europe) and let the Jews go back to their own countries."
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by parkerbink
    You can't possibly be this dense.


    Oh no, you deffinately are. What do you call demolition of Palestinian homes. That is Occupied land...I need a drill for your thick skull.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by parkerbink
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.


    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........
    OCCUPIED land........

    Do I need to get you a dictionary.

    Leave a comment:


  • yoni
    replied
    Convention.... with a T.

    Surely you can't believe that you, someone who can barely spell, of all people, could maintain a coherent, reasonable argument.

    Joshh, throw in the towel.. gtfo.

    Leave a comment:


  • parkerbink
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    What happened to "Israel just wants peace"? Hey, let's take it out on the Palestinians. And that's the problem. Israel doesn't want peace. Which does violate the Geneva convension.
    You can't possibly be this dense.

    Leave a comment:


  • parkerbink
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    I think you need to read it....LMFAO. So as long as the invading force takes the land for themselves it doesn't violate the Geneva Convensin....how do you explain what israel is doing in Palistine and the settlements they have set up on palestinian land?
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.
    The Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by parkerbink
    Yes that is true. However the enemies of Israel said that was unacceptable and attacked over and over, each time losing land.

    You understand, if you gamble and lose there are no do overs?


    Sort of like you may have been percieved as a normal person prior to this thread, now not so much.


    What happened to "Israel just wants peace"? Hey, let's take it out on the Palestinians. And that's the problem. Israel doesn't want peace. Which does violate the Geneva convension.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by parkerbink
    qft.



    What does the Geneva Convention have to do with land taken in war?




    The Geneva Conventions consist of four treaties formulated in Geneva, Switzerland, that set the standards for international law for humanitarian concerns.
    They chiefly concern the treatment of non-combatants and prisoners of war. They do not affect the use of weapons in war, which are covered by the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and the Geneva Protocol on the use of gas and biological weapons of 1925 (The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees is also referred to as "the Geneva Convention", but it is not part of these four).
    The Conventions were the results of efforts by Henry Dunant, who was motivated by the horrors of war he witnessed at the Battle of Solferino in 1859. In 1977 and 2005 three separate amendments were made part of the Geneva Conventions.
    The adoption of the First Convention followed the foundation of the International Committee of the Red Cross in 1863. The text is given the title Resolutions of the Geneva International Conference, Geneva, 26–29 October 1863.
    As of 2 August 2006,[1] when the Republic of Montenegro adopted the four conventions, they have been ratified by 194 countries.


    And again all land not included in the 1947 border was won in wars in which Israel was attacked. How many times must that be stated?



    I think you need to read it....LMFAO. So as long as the invading force takes the land for themselves it doesn't violate the Geneva Convensin....how do you explain what israel is doing in Palistine and the settlements they have set up on palestinian land?

    Leave a comment:


  • Chisum
    replied
    Militant Islam Threatens Us All
    Hamas rockets have the same terror goal as Hitler's blitz.Article

    By BENJAMIN NETANYAHU
    Imagine a siren that gives you 30 seconds to find shelter before a Kassam rocket falls from the sky and explodes, spraying its lethal shrapnel in all directions. Now imagine this happens day after day, month after month, year after year.

    If you can imagine that, you can begin to understand the terror to which hundreds of thousands of Israelis have been subjected. Three years ago Israel withdrew from every square inch of Gaza. And since that withdrawal, our civilians have been targeted by more than 6,000 rockets and mortars fired from Gaza. In the face of this relentless bombardment, Israel has acted with a restraint that other countries, faced with a similar threat, would find hard to fathom. Israel's government has finally decided to respond.

    For this action to succeed, we must first have moral clarity. There is no moral equivalence between Israel, a democracy which seeks peace and targets the terrorists, and Hamas, an Iranian-backed terror organization that seeks Israel's destruction and targets the innocent.

    In launching precision strikes against Hamas rocket launchers, headquarters, weapons depots, smuggling tunnels and training camps, Israel is trying to minimize civilian casualties. But Hamas deliberately attacks Israeli civilians and deliberately hides behind Palestinian civilians -- a double war crime. Responsible governments do their utmost to minimize civilian casualties, but they do not grant immunity to terrorists who use civilians as human shields.

    The international community may occasionally condemn Hamas for putting Palestinian civilians in harm's way, but if it ultimately holds Israel responsible for the casualties that ensue, then Hamas and other terror organizations will employ this abominable tactic again and again.

    The charge that Israel is using disproportionate force is equally baseless. Does proportionality demand that Israel fire 6,000 rockets indiscriminately back at Gaza? Does it demand an equal number of casualties on both sides? Using that logic, one would conclude that the United States employed disproportionate force against the Germans because 20 times as many Germans as Americans died in World War II.

    In that same war, Britain responded to the firing of thousands of rockets on its population with the wholesale bombing of German cities. Israel's measured response to rocket fire on its cities has come in the form of surgical strikes. To further root out Hamas terrorists in a way that minimizes Palestinian civilian casualties, Israel's army is now engaged in a ground operation that places its soldiers in great peril. Carpet-bombing of Palestinian cities is not an option that any Israeli leader will entertain.

    The goal of this mission should be clear: To end the current round of missile attacks and to remove the threat of such attacks in the future. The only cease-fire or diplomatic initiative that should be accepted is one that achieves this dual objective.

    If our enemies assumed that the Israeli public would be divided on the eve of an election, they were wrong. When it comes to exercising our most basic right of self-defense, there is no opposition and no coalition. We stand united against Hamas because we know that only by defeating Hamas can we provide security for our people and hope for a future peace.

    We fight to defend ourselves, but in so doing we are also fighting a fanatical ideology that seeks to reverse the course of history and throw the civilized world back into a new dark age. The struggle between militant Islam and modernity -- whether fought in Afghanistan, Iraq, India or Gaza -- will decide our common future. It is a battle we cannot afford to lose.

    Leave a comment:


  • parkerbink
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    This is how the Un divided it up.

    Yes that is true. However the enemies of Israel said that was unacceptable and attacked over and over, each time losing land.

    You understand, if you gamble and lose there are no do overs?


    Sort of like you may have been perceived as a normal person prior to this thread, now not so much.

    Interesting how you ignore my response showing the Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes and you move on to another attempt at rationalizing the land dispute.
    Last edited by parkerbink; 01-07-2009, 08:35 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    This is how the Un divided it up.

    Leave a comment:


  • parkerbink
    replied
    Originally posted by blunt
    joshh is the heeter of palenstine only without good statistics

    qft.

    Originally posted by joshh
    And that is covered in the Geneva Convention how! Rhetorical....
    What does the Geneva Convention have to do with land taken in war?




    The Geneva Conventions consist of four treaties formulated in Geneva, Switzerland, that set the standards for international law for humanitarian concerns.
    They chiefly concern the treatment of non-combatants and prisoners of war. They do not affect the use of weapons in war, which are covered by the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and the Geneva Protocol on the use of gas and biological weapons of 1925 (The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees is also referred to as "the Geneva Convention", but it is not part of these four).
    The Conventions were the results of efforts by Henry Dunant, who was motivated by the horrors of war he witnessed at the Battle of Solferino in 1859. In 1977 and 2005 three separate amendments were made part of the Geneva Conventions.
    The adoption of the First Convention followed the foundation of the International Committee of the Red Cross in 1863. The text is given the title Resolutions of the Geneva International Conference, Geneva, 26–29 October 1863.
    As of 2 August 2006,[1] when the Republic of Montenegro adopted the four conventions, they have been ratified by 194 countries.


    And again all land not included in the 1947 border was won in wars in which Israel was attacked. How many times must that be stated?

    Leave a comment:


  • yoni
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    Of course I am with my "Palestine and Israel have equal rights to that land" comments.

    Again, STFU.
    Originally posted by joshh
    598...try to follow along would you.





    Ahhhhhhhhhh, Blunt is being ignorant again, remember you're Blunt not ignorant.
    Your rhetoric and IGNORANCE bewilder me.

    I've been following, moron.

    None of your comments have even remotely insisted that "Palestine and Israel have equal rights to that land"

    You have time and time again demonstrated your anti-semitism.

    Originally posted by joshh
    You have it wrong which the exact problem with israelis that are Zionists. The Palestinian people want at least their land back from 1967. It's Hamas and several other organizations that want to wipe Israel off the face of the planet. Get your facts right Zionist.
    Are you sure you aren't Hamas..?

    Leave a comment:

Working...