Looks like we are past the Global Warming thing
Collapse
X
-
Lol, yes, I am an arrogant moron. I think I know a little about what I am speaking of. Youve contributed nothing to this thread at all. Ya'll in hillbilly land typically do not care about our reefs and marine life though. Ya'll care about your cattle, tornadoes, and fried foods. You should be punched in your face for being such a failure. Suck an arrogant dick.Leave a comment:
-
I got an email yesterday, he said "you can stop now!" :roll:Originally posted by GodGo forth and multiply! 2000bcLeave a comment:
-
jflip, you're such an arrogant moron, stick to working out and waxing intellectual about supplements.
I'll take a cue out of the jflip school of posting and denigrate you for not using the correct form of "you're".
So yes YOU'RE retarded, OMG!!!!!!11!!1!111!Leave a comment:
-
not at all. the quote says in essence there won't be enough room for plants to grow because of overpopulation.
i'd like to know i guess what % of world wide land mass is physically occupied by man. i'm guessing it's way under 10%.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
lolYes, CO2 promotes photosynthesis.... But at the rate we are populating the earth, the fear is there wont be any room for these plants to photosynthesize. Or at least not as many plants we need to keep up with our CO2 outputs. You can doubt CO2 is a problem, but its a proven fact that it is raising, and it is detrimental to us. If not to our atmospheric gases alone, but to the coral reefs certainly.
u ever fly in an airplane anywhere
u think we're running out of room?Leave a comment:
-
co2 is 38 parts per million, a trace element,and it's effect is logrithmic. you have to quadruple co2 to get a double of whatever effect it supposedly is havingYour argument has no basis in logic. Just because co2 particles only make up a small portion of the atmosphere, that does not mean that increased co2 levels have no effect. Also, you kind of shoot yourself in the foot when you say that co2 particles are twice what they were when we started burning fossil fuels. What exactly are you arguing?Leave a comment:
-
I never disputed any of this. I said in one of my first posts, that my view was it is ignorant to dismiss either cause of this warming, whether it be natural or man made. I was expressing the concern towards the reefs (one of three things I do love).josh gets cookie
flip
ok you have a point about cycling of the reefs I know that but very little about it (marine biology is not a interest if mine in the least) Just saying our very small amount of CO2 production is having nothing to do with our current "climate change". We have good accurate records for the weather for what 150 years right??? How long has the earth been around for?? 4.5 billion so we know what kinda cycles this the planet goes through on the short term but know so little about the long term. We can get good educated guess about it form geologic an ice core data but that leaves lots of questions as well.Leave a comment:
-
I'm sure C02 was the cause for the little ice age as well...
and thanks for the cookie....kind of.....Leave a comment:
-
josh gets cookie
flip
ok you have a point about cycling of the reefs I know that but very little about it (marine biology is not a interest if mine in the least) Just saying our very small amount of CO2 production is having nothing to do with our current "climate change". We have good accurate records for the weather for what 150 years right??? How long has the earth been around for?? 4.5 billion so we know what kinda cycles this the planet goes through on the short term but know so little about the long term. We can get good educated guess about it form geologic an ice core data but that leaves lots of questions as well.Leave a comment:


Leave a comment: