Looks like we are past the Global Warming thing

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • blunttech
    replied
    You should be punched in your face for being such a failure.

    Leave a comment:


  • jflip2002
    replied
    Originally posted by z31maniac
    jflip, you're such an arrogant moron, stick to working out and waxing intellectual about supplements.



    I'll take a cue out of the jflip school of posting and denigrate you for not using the correct form of "you're".

    So yes YOU'RE retarded, OMG!!!!!!11!!1!111!

    Lol, yes, I am an arrogant moron. I think I know a little about what I am speaking of. Youve contributed nothing to this thread at all. Ya'll in hillbilly land typically do not care about our reefs and marine life though. Ya'll care about your cattle, tornadoes, and fried foods. You should be punched in your face for being such a failure. Suck an arrogant dick.

    Leave a comment:


  • napabavarian
    replied
    Originally posted by God
    Go forth and multiply! 2000bc
    I got an email yesterday, he said "you can stop now!" :roll:

    Leave a comment:


  • z31maniac
    replied
    jflip, you're such an arrogant moron, stick to working out and waxing intellectual about supplements.

    Originally posted by Intro
    OMG we cant talk about current events without being scientists!!! WE cant have opinions, or beliefs all we are, are sheep.
    Wow your retarded
    I'll take a cue out of the jflip school of posting and denigrate you for not using the correct form of "you're".

    So yes YOU'RE retarded, OMG!!!!!!11!!1!111!

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by Intro
    So by your logic because you cant see it there is nothing there, and in fact a void in existence?
    not at all. the quote says in essence there won't be enough room for plants to grow because of overpopulation.
    i'd like to know i guess what % of world wide land mass is physically occupied by man. i'm guessing it's way under 10%.

    Leave a comment:


  • Intro
    replied
    Originally posted by gwb72tii
    lol
    u ever fly in an airplane anywhere
    u think we're running out of room?
    So by your logic because you cant see it there is nothing there, and in fact a void in existence?

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    Originally posted by gwb72tii
    co2 is 38 parts per million, a trace element,and it's effect is logrithmic. you have to quadruple co2 to get a double of whatever effect it supposedly is having

    thank you thats the stuff I could not recall on the spot and am to lazy to go look it up.

    Leave a comment:


  • jflip2002
    replied
    That makes no sense....

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by jflip2002
    Yes, CO2 promotes photosynthesis.... But at the rate we are populating the earth, the fear is there wont be any room for these plants to photosynthesize. Or at least not as many plants we need to keep up with our CO2 outputs. You can doubt CO2 is a problem, but its a proven fact that it is raising, and it is detrimental to us. If not to our atmospheric gases alone, but to the coral reefs certainly.
    lol
    u ever fly in an airplane anywhere
    u think we're running out of room?

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by h0lmes
    Your argument has no basis in logic. Just because co2 particles only make up a small portion of the atmosphere, that does not mean that increased co2 levels have no effect. Also, you kind of shoot yourself in the foot when you say that co2 particles are twice what they were when we started burning fossil fuels. What exactly are you arguing?
    co2 is 38 parts per million, a trace element,and it's effect is logrithmic. you have to quadruple co2 to get a double of whatever effect it supposedly is having

    Leave a comment:


  • jflip2002
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsleeve
    josh gets cookie


    flip

    ok you have a point about cycling of the reefs I know that but very little about it (marine biology is not a interest if mine in the least) Just saying our very small amount of CO2 production is having nothing to do with our current "climate change". We have good accurate records for the weather for what 150 years right??? How long has the earth been around for?? 4.5 billion so we know what kinda cycles this the planet goes through on the short term but know so little about the long term. We can get good educated guess about it form geologic an ice core data but that leaves lots of questions as well.
    I never disputed any of this. I said in one of my first posts, that my view was it is ignorant to dismiss either cause of this warming, whether it be natural or man made. I was expressing the concern towards the reefs (one of three things I do love).

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    I'm sure C02 was the cause for the little ice age as well...

    and thanks for the cookie....kind of.....

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    josh gets cookie


    flip

    ok you have a point about cycling of the reefs I know that but very little about it (marine biology is not a interest if mine in the least) Just saying our very small amount of CO2 production is having nothing to do with our current "climate change". We have good accurate records for the weather for what 150 years right??? How long has the earth been around for?? 4.5 billion so we know what kinda cycles this the planet goes through on the short term but know so little about the long term. We can get good educated guess about it form geologic an ice core data but that leaves lots of questions as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • delfin
    replied
    Originally posted by atomic
    What if I told you there WAS a spoon?

    Leave a comment:


  • atomic
    replied

    Leave a comment:

Working...