Nuclear summit this Monday

[kronus]

Why not? Jihadist's do as do the Japanese and so on...

The "jihad" is an insurgency, not a major military conflict. If I recall correctly, it was America who nuked two Japanese cities and caused hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths. I would think the Japanese think they lost that one.

[Naplm00]

Anyone truly thik that our involvment in this reigon will fix anything? How old is this war in the holy land? like 900 years?

[jrhaile]

The "jihad" is an insurgency, not a major military conflict. If I recall correctly, it was America who nuked two Japanese cities and caused hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths. I would think the Japanese think they lost that one.

I was referring to the people who perform the attacks on civilians. We call them terrorists, they consider themselves jihadists. And Japan deserved what they got.

[mrsleeve]

The "jihad" is an insurgency, not a major military conflict. If I recall correctly, it was America who nuked two Japanese cities and caused hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths. I would think the Japanese think they lost that one.

do we actually have to have this conversation again about the many many more lives on both sides that it would have cost to end the war if we had not used the fat man and little boy

[jrhaile]

do we actually have to have this conversation again about the many many more lives on both sides that it would have cost to end the war if we had not used the fat man and little boy

America is bad in the eyes of liberal waffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffles's. Just get used to it. Japan should be sucking our dicks that we didn't wipe them from the map like we should have.

We need to get over the idea that we as American's are somehow better than the rest of the world and that we need to act or treat other people more humanly than they treat us. We aren't better than anyone else in the world (besides the Dutch :D) and we need to start acting like world bully's again instead of world bitches for everyone to shit on.

[kronus]

do we actually have to have this conversation again about the many many more lives on both sides that it would have cost to end the war if we had not used the fat man and little boy

That's completely not what my post was about, but ok.

[kronus]

America is bad in the eyes of liberal waffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffles's. Just get used to it. Japan should be sucking our dicks that we didn't wipe them from the map like we should have.

We need to get over the idea that we as American's are somehow better than the rest of the world and that we need to act or treat other people more humanly than they treat us. We aren't better than anyone else in the world (besides the Dutch :D) and we need to start acting like world bully's again instead of world bitches for everyone to shit on.

Since when is America, the country that accounts for half of the world's annual budget for "defense" programs, "world bitches for everyone to shit on"? Sounds like you have an inferiority complex and feel the need to assert your dominance by being an internet tough guy ;)

(also, Japan practically did suck the U.S.'s dick for seven years after WWII, although they were forced to. Now, their culture is fucked up.)

[Farbin Kaiber]

http://r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=163535

[Stephen]

Since when is America, the country that accounts for half of the world's annual budget for "defense" programs, "world bitches for everyone to shit on"? Sounds like you have an inferiority complex and feel the need to assert your dominance by being an internet tough guy ;)

(also, Japan practically did suck the U.S.'s dick for seven years after WWII, although they were forced to. Now, their culture is fucked up.)

so thats where the tentacles come from.

[joshh]

We will never have no nukes on this planet as long as humans are still alive. It just isn't going to happen. It's a feel good do good job Obama is trying to pull not a realistic one.

Might as well wish for Santa to really exist.

[jrhaile]

Since when is America, the country that accounts for half of the world's annual budget for "defense" programs, "world bitches for everyone to shit on"? Sounds like you have an inferiority complex and feel the need to assert your dominance by being an internet tough guy ;)

(also, Japan practically did suck the U.S.'s dick for seven years after WWII, although they were forced to. Now, their culture is fucked up.)

No I have a problem with liberals in America spouting shit out of their mouths constantly that we need to be nicer and more diplomatic to the rest of the world when we FUCKING don't.

My point was, we're not better than anyone and if we have to nuke, waterboard or whatever to preserve America as it is, then so be it. Fight fire with fire motherbiches!

We will never have no nukes on this planet as long as humans are still alive. It just isn't going to happen. It's a feel good do good job Obama is trying to pull not a realistic one.

Might as well wish for Santa to really exist.

Wait, you're telling me Santa isn't real?

[E30Kaiser]

I'm not sure if I would classify the murder of millions of innocent civilians a win.

There is no such thing as innocent civilians in war(unless they are some hermit pacifist not paying taxes in the woods), only "non-combatants". And I guess you can't consider World War II a win fo the Allies by your classification of victory.

[Bill 84 318i]

First please learn to spell, Second America could win any war it wanted to win if they did not care about the media that followed.

Is that sarcasm? Do you really think media backlash is the only thing holding the US back from world domination?

SO really all this submissive body language really dose mean he wants to put the USA into a submissive place in the world and this nuke deal is one of the biggest ways to get that done.

That's not Mark Mardell's take of Obama's plan for nukes (http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereport...lear_goal.html): "Cynics might see it as a carefully clothed exercise designed to reinforce US dominance and the status quo. After all, his plan, if successful, would remove nuclear weapons from the hands of the enemies of the US, move a lot of weapons-grade material to America and leave the US with more nukes than anyone else."

[mrsleeve]

That's not Mark Mardell's take of Obama's plan for nukes (http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereport...lear_goal.html): "Cynics might see it as a carefully clothed exercise designed to reinforce US dominance and the status quo. After all, his plan, if successful, would remove nuclear weapons from the hands of the enemies of the US, move a lot of weapons-grade material to America and leave the US with more nukes than anyone else."

If thats what truly ends up the case, I will be the 1st to eat my words. Dont hold your breath waiting for this put come though.