Uncle Ted and the Washington time

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • mrsleeve
    I waste 90% of my day here and all I got was this stupid title
    • Mar 2005
    • 16385
    #1

    Uncle Ted and the Washington time

    ^S
    Wow 1st the 2 year in the making comprehensive tinfoil hattery of 2 weeks ago, and now printing this in the opinion page.

    I love uncle Ted, he may be a little crazy and out there a bit further into Right field than most of us, I have to agree with much of what he has to say.

    Originally posted by Uncle Ted
    Barack Hussein Obama did not sneak into power. An army of clueless, disconnected, ignorant Americans invited him to bring his Marxist, glaringly anti-American jihad into our lives. This president's overtly destructive, clear-and-present-danger agenda is surpassed in transparency only by his ultra-leftist public voting record and overall lifetime conduct of consorting with the enemy as a child and student of Marxism, socialist and racist community organizer, congregant of the blatant America-hating black-theology- and social-justice-spewing Rev. Jeremiah Wright and close personal friend of convicted communist terrorists like Bill Ayers, and by his unflinching appointment of an array of communist czars, including Van Jones, Cass Sunstein, Anita Dunne, et al. So let me get this straight: You claim your intentions were noble because you simply wanted to get your child a puppy but somehow didn't notice that it was foaming at the mouth, and now you're shocked that your child has rabies? I think not. That is not a mistake. It is negligence -- dangerous, life threatening and, I am convinced, downright criminal negligence.
    Read the rest here
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-is-us/?page=1

    Discuss
    Originally posted by Fusion
    If a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
    The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de Tocqueville


    The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken

    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
    William Pitt-
    Tags: None
    • CorvallisBMW
      Long Schlong Longhammer
      • Feb 2005
      • 13039
      #2
      The guy has every right to express his opinion. But to claim that voting for someone he doesn't approve of is "dangerous, life threatening and, I am convinced, downright criminal negligence" sounds like he's in favor of a one-party dictatorship where all who disagree are squelched and/or arrested. Something tells me he's a proponent of democracy and wouldn't want to see the US become the next North Korea, but then why suggest that it be dangerous, even criminal, to vote for another party? What ever happened to 'Freedom First'? Does it only apply if everyone else agrees with your opinion and choices?

      Not saying he does, just playing devil's advocate :)

        Comment

        • mrsleeve
          I waste 90% of my day here and all I got was this stupid title
          • Mar 2005
          • 16385
          #3
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

          You did read the whole thing, not just the 1st paragraph that I have quoted here right.
          Originally posted by Fusion
          If a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
          The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de Tocqueville


          The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken

          Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
          William Pitt-

            Comment

            • joshh
              R3V OG
              • Aug 2004
              • 6195
              #4
              Sounds pretty damned accurate. You just have to remind yourself that many Americans have zero confront for evil.
              Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

              "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

              ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

                Comment

                • uofom3
                  R3V Elite
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 5392
                  #5
                  Originally posted by CorvallisBMW
                  The guy has every right to express his opinion. But to claim that voting for someone he doesn't approve of is "dangerous, life threatening and, I am convinced, downright criminal negligence" sounds like he's in favor of a one-party dictatorship where all who disagree are squelched and/or arrested. Something tells me he's a proponent of democracy and wouldn't want to see the US become the next North Korea, but then why suggest that it be dangerous, even criminal, to vote for another party? What ever happened to 'Freedom First'? Does it only apply if everyone else agrees with your opinion and choices?

                  Not saying he does, just playing devil's advocate :)
                  Isn't one party dictatorship what we have now effectively? How's that working out?


                  Or maybe I can take a $370k vacation to feel better about it...
                  PNW Crew
                  90 m3
                  06 m5

                    Comment

                    • CorvallisBMW
                      Long Schlong Longhammer
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 13039
                      #6
                      Originally posted by uofom3
                      Isn't one party dictatorship what we have now effectively? How's that working out?
                      um....no?

                      Last I checked it was still a 2 party system. One party may control the WH and congress but that's hardly a dictatorship.

                        Comment

                        • Farbin Kaiber
                          Lil' Puppet
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 29502
                          #7
                          Originally posted by CorvallisBMW
                          um....no?

                          Last I checked it was still a 2 party system. One party may control the WH and congress but that's hardly a dictatorship.

                          Actually I agree more with ^^, It's like we have one party (comprised of both sham groups) that is playing both sides against the middle in a goofed up "Good Cop, Bad Cop" Italian dinner theater.

                            Comment

                            • CorvallisBMW
                              Long Schlong Longhammer
                              • Feb 2005
                              • 13039
                              #8
                              Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber
                              Actually I agree more with ^^, It's like we have one party (comprised of both sham groups) that is playing both sides against the middle in a goofed up "Good Cop, Bad Cop" Italian dinner theater.
                              True, and I would agree with that persepective.

                              I had in mine that the '1 party dictatorship' comment reffered to the Dems being in control. Hardly a dictatorship, certainly no more so than 2000-2006 was for the GOP.

                              But put both groups together, and realize they're both total shit, and it's impossible for a 3rd party to make an inroads; effectively creating dictatorship of sorts.

                                Comment

                                • reelop19
                                  Banned
                                  • Jan 2010
                                  • 770
                                  #9
                                  Excuse my conspiracy theory buy fuck the 2 parties, they're all the same because they do what the Fed tells them to.

                                    Comment

                                    Previous template Next
                                    Working...