Prop 8

[Dozyproductions]

For the sake of arguing being fun today... tell me how I'm a bigot or ignorant? Might it be perhaps that you take things way too seriously? All my gay friends I call waffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffless and all my black friends I really just call niukha or nigga. It's cool because they just call me a dirty polak and no one gets hurt. Perhaps your sensitivity covers up your ignorance? ;)

[camshaftgsxr]

Posting a video of a comedy skit, that is offensive, doesn't make you less of an ignorant bigot. ;)


go call a black person the n-word and see how that works for you, or a gay guy a f-word (which i just found out to my pleasant surprise is blocked on this site). i bet you won't, because its offensive. rationalize it all you want with all the videos on youtube. you walk the walk of an ignorant bigot and you talk the talk of an ignorant bigot. you know the rest.

[Cabriolet]

the r3vers

here's a list of them http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=292042

[Dozyproductions]

saying "the" before a group implies that they are different than you, and most of the time it implies inferiority.

[2761377]

Oh I see you want to redefine your own version of what happened. Good luck, god bless

my definition has not been revised at all. just hoping to cure your ignorance.

[Arems87e]

saying "the" before a group implies that they are different than you, and most of the time it implies inferiority.

I don't know what planet you live on, but I hate to remind you that HUMANS are DIFFERENT by all sorts of characteristics, either it be by color, race/ethnicity, belief, religion, sexual orientation etc

you need to rid of that "P.C." bullshit out of your head bro.

[camshaftgsxr]

The christians, jews, straights, whites, latinos, europeans, soccer players, lawyers, pedophiles.

saying "the" before a group implies that they are different than you, and most of the time it implies inferiority.

[Dozyproductions]

I love how people say "the gays" i wonder if saying "the blacks" is ok as well.

The christians, jews, straights, whites, latinos, europeans, soccer players, lawyers, pedophiles.

It doesn't matter beyond which has more influence to fulfill the economic and political agenda of the day. Don't be butt hurt pun intended.

What about gun control, obamacare, the federal reserve system and etc? It's all put on the back burner of American consciousness.

[BraveUlysses]

no, we are not saying the same thing. prop 8 stands after Supreme Court review only because of a technicality. the merits of a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage were not addressed- therefore no Supreme Court case law precedent going forward.

should another state amend its constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage, the resulting lawsuit could make it back to the Supreme Court. if such a law were defended by the official state attorney general then the Courts' decision would become a precedent like roe v. wade. or plessy v. ferguson

the only precedent in this decision is that elected state officials may ignore the will of the people and act according to their own conscience.

which, if you think about it, is not a good thing.

Oh I see you want to redefine your own version of what happened. Good luck, god bless

[camshaftgsxr]

OH god damn it's literally, physically painful how stupid some of you are.

However, it completely explains the current state of the US.

just read the last three pages of your arguments.

you sir have my second on literally everything you just said.

this homo thanks you.

[camshaftgsxr]

I love how people say "the gays" i wonder if saying "the blacks" is ok as well.

[tjts1]

the only precedent in this decision is that elected state officials may ignore the will of the people and act according to their own conscience.

No such new precedent was established in this case. There have been other cases where there the state has refused to defend an existing law.

[z31maniac]

OH god damn it's literally, physically painful how stupid some of you are.

However, it completely explains the current state of the US.

[2761377]

Essentially we are saying the same thing,

"The Prop 8 ruling, on the other hand, is less decisive and more complicated. Prop 8 is a 2008 California ballot initiative that prohibited same-sex marriage by amending the state’s constitution. The case was dismissed today on the basis that the petitioners don’t have standing; since the California courts have already struck down Prop 8, the lawyers opposing the bill don’t have standing to defend it. This means the court has effectively validated the rulings of lower courts that have rejected Prop 8."

no, we are not saying the same thing. prop 8 stands after Supreme Court review only because of a technicality. the merits of a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage were not addressed- therefore no Supreme Court case law precedent going forward.

should another state amend its constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage, the resulting lawsuit could make it back to the Supreme Court. if such a law were defended by the official state attorney general then the Courts' decision would become a precedent like roe v. wade. or plessy v. ferguson

the only precedent in this decision is that elected state officials may ignore the will of the people and act according to their own conscience.

which, if you think about it, is not a good thing.

[Dozyproductions]

nvm.