ICE director gets a no vote...great read.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • joshh
    R3V OG
    • Aug 2004
    • 6195
    #1

    ICE director gets a no vote...great read.

    http://www.cis.org/kephart/ICE-mission-melt-1





    • While ICE reports internally that more than 90 percent of ICE detainees are first encountered in jails after they are arrested by local police for criminal charges, ICE senior leadership misrepresents this information publicly in order to portray ICE detainees as being non-criminal in nature to support the Administration's position on amnesty and relaxed security at ICE detention facilities.

    • The majority of ICE ERO Officers are prohibited from making street arrests or enforcing United States immigration laws outside of the institutional (jail) setting. This has effectively created "amnesty through policy" for anyone illegally in the United States who has not been arrested by another agency for a criminal violation.


    Golly, wonder why we can't secure our borders.
    Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

    "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

    ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama
    Tags: None
    • Farbin Kaiber
      Lil' Puppet
      • Jul 2007
      • 29502
      #2
      WOW. Explains a lot. Josh, what you've got to understand is the power system is not willing to forgo low cost labor, and a pool of "needs" recipients. The borders are not secure for a reason. If the Federal Government wanted the border secure, you can bet your ass it would be.

        Comment

        • joshh
          R3V OG
          • Aug 2004
          • 6195
          #3
          Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber
          WOW. Explains a lot. Josh, what you've got to understand is the power system is not willing to forgo low cost labor, and a pool of "needs" recipients. The borders are not secure for a reason. If the Federal Government wanted the border secure, you can bet your ass it would be.


          I totally agree. Both sides (Dems and Reps) have their reasons and neither benefit Americans.
          Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

          "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

          ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

            Comment

            • mrsleeve
              I waste 90% of my day here and all I got was this stupid title
              • Mar 2005
              • 16385
              #4
              Originally posted by joshh
              I totally agree. Both sides (Dems and Reps) have their reasons and neither benefit Americans.
              This is my view as well.
              Originally posted by Fusion
              If a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
              The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de Tocqueville


              The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken

              Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
              William Pitt-

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...