Originally posted by gwb72tii
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chump for President
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by marshallnoise View PostNo doubt it will be my fault when he comes back.
it's not at all your fault that agent allows his political bias to influence how he enforces rules.
anyway the most recent disgusting thing out of drumpf's mouth lately was how american soldiers "don't fight to win anymore"-
The latest Feature,/features,,features, breaking news, comment, reviews and features from the experts at The Week
go fuck yourself you draft-dodging silver-spoon-sucking piece of shit.
(here's hoping i don't get banned again because swearing at 45 is also not allowed.)Last edited by decay; 03-05-2017, 08:17 PM.past:
1989 325is (learner shitbox)
1986 325e (turbo dorito)
1991 318ic (5-lug ITB)
1985 323i baur
current:
1995 M3 (suspension, 17x9/255-40, borla)
Comment
-
Originally posted by decay View Postit's not at all your fault that agent allows his political bias to influence how he enforces rules.
Comment
-
Originally posted by agent View PostI understand you're frustrated over your timeout, though I'm curious to know how you're formulating your opinion on my political bias.past:
1989 325is (learner shitbox)
1986 325e (turbo dorito)
1991 318ic (5-lug ITB)
1985 323i baur
current:
1995 M3 (suspension, 17x9/255-40, borla)
Comment
-
Originally posted by gwb72tii View PostBan
And the commander in chiefs opinion of how we fight was directed at obama and his rules of engagement. We haven't fought to win since WW2
given that "since ww2" also includes korea, vietnam, panama, somalia, desert shield/storm, the balkan conflicts, why is 70 years of history obama's fault? he's not even that old yet.
i was in the middle of my iraq deployment when obama got elected and took office. the rules of engagement didn't change while i was there. rumsfeld had gotten his ass kicked out about a year earlier, but we were still under his op orders.
war is never pretty but we left some of those shit-shows better than we found them (or started them).past:
1989 325is (learner shitbox)
1986 325e (turbo dorito)
1991 318ic (5-lug ITB)
1985 323i baur
current:
1995 M3 (suspension, 17x9/255-40, borla)
Comment
-
Just going to watch the dunken postings of a mad-man.Si vis pacem, para bellum.
New Hawtness: 1995 540i/6 Claptrap
Defunct too: Cirrusblau m30 Project
Defunct (sold): Alta Vista
79 Bronco SHTF Build
Comment
-
Originally posted by marshallnoise View PostJust going to watch the dunken postings of a mad-man.
agent, denying what you did doesn't mean you didn't actually do it. but we're cool.past:
1989 325is (learner shitbox)
1986 325e (turbo dorito)
1991 318ic (5-lug ITB)
1985 323i baur
current:
1995 M3 (suspension, 17x9/255-40, borla)
Comment
-
Originally posted by decay View Posthaha, i'm not drunk... and did you miss the part where i agreed with you?
agent, denying what you did doesn't mean you didn't actually do it. but we're cool.
Either way, the break didn't cure your anger at the world. Not that it would necessarily.Si vis pacem, para bellum.
New Hawtness: 1995 540i/6 Claptrap
Defunct too: Cirrusblau m30 Project
Defunct (sold): Alta Vista
79 Bronco SHTF Build
Comment
-
Originally posted by gwb72tii View PostAnd mbonder
You are giving reasons why the federal government can justify what it does. Lol no surprise as the gov grows in size there are always justifications.
I'm telling you the DoED is not justified in any form if you read the constitution
I can see clear justification for these departments based on the Constitution:
All fall under trade/commerce of some sort:
Agriculture
Commerce
Labor
Transportation
All fall under protection/conservation of some sort (domestic and foreign):
Interior
Defense
Justice
Homeland Security
Science/Research/Welfare:
Health and Human Services
Energy
Veterans Affairs
Foreign Relations:
State
Finance/Taxes:
Treasury
So that leaves us with Housing and Urban Development and Department of Education. I'd justify both of these departments as being for the greater welfare of the people, but there isn't anything in the Constitution that explicitly states anything about either.
So beyond your (gwb72tii) view that there is no justification for the department, what is it exactly about the DoEd that you don't like? I guess a shift in this discussion because I'm curious.
Comment
-
And I guess because I've taken a tangent in this thread away from the original intent of it, here's my "on topic" question for the thread:
How does everyone feel about the perception that Trump is itching for a war? He's just spoken about increasing the size and scope of the military, given the go-ahead for a raid in a foreign country, and spoken about "winning wars again". Is it just bluster to appear strong on the international stage or is he gearing up for another international conflict?
Comment
-
Originally posted by z31maniac View PostThis is amusing to see you getting your ass handed to you in so many threads lately.
Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View PostAll the sudden Wiki is a valid evidence source? For the last eight years I recall people getting creamed for claiming a user-edited resource is factual.
I brought it because you and other posters give GWB a pass on the constant arguments from ignorance--his knowledge on the DoED doesn't even constitute a paragraph so any improvement in that knowledge, even a non-ideal source like wikipedia would be an improvement.
Originally posted by mbonder View PostAnd I guess because I've taken a tangent in this thread away from the original intent of it, here's my "on topic" question for the thread:
How does everyone feel about the perception that Trump is itching for a war? He's just spoken about increasing the size and scope of the military, given the go-ahead for a raid in a foreign country, and spoken about "winning wars again". Is it just bluster to appear strong on the international stage or is he gearing up for another international conflict?
Comment
Comment