NASA says Climate Change exagerated?

[herbivor]

http://www.wjla.com/blogs/weather/20...ng--11743.html

Damn, now coal is causing global cooling. Dem darn scientasts.

This herb guy is a gas. It's extremely entertaining to read his posts.

Scientists also observed immediate global temperature rising for the 2 days after 9/11/01. The reason; planes weren't flying. The particulate matter from the exhaust and condensation asks as a shade blocking some of the sun's radiation. Pollution is a double edge sword when it comes to global warming. The gases higher in the atmosphere trap heat while particulate matter from pollution help block it. Current models already account for this, although it's hard to predict how much a country will pollute in the future.

[dj01540i6sp]

May be the Planets are spreading outward letting in more of the Sun's Gama Rays which makes a clearer path nothing to shade us to speak of. What about the Asteroids that is Heading towards US / Earth, They better figure out a way to Pull - Push - Drag, them out of our Orbital Path. I think is the most important thing that can / has to be figured out to do such thing. Some day it will save the Earth besides, Nature Destroying it by X ? X ? X ? Volcanoes going off simultaneously and blocking the Sun's Light / Heat for several months.

I know God is my savior! I'm not really concerned about Death.

We need to work on keeping Earth Life sustainable.

[HarryPotter]

http://www.wjla.com/blogs/weather/2011/07/is-china-s-coal-pollution-helping-slow-down-global-warming--11743.html

Damn, now coal is causing global cooling. Dem darn scientasts.

This herb guy is a gas. It's extremely entertaining to read his posts.

[dirtysix]

I'm a fan of global warming.

[Fusion]

When the GW nonsense blows over, the *alarmists* will claim a victory in that they helped do *enough* to make the temps cool...

Then a group of alarmists will say it was cooled too much.
Maybe then we'll get free gas to warm this shit up again.

Fighting over a damn microwavable dinner temperature.

[herbivor]

Ah yes Dick Lindzen. The only scientist with a "reputable" background that the skeptics love to site. Unfortunately you forgot to mention that Dick's predictions he made back in the 80's regarding temperature rise was way off whereas the models he loves to critisize were far more accurate. Your link was not new to me or useful in any way. But thanks for the effort.

[gwb72tii]

herbie, this is too easy
i'll give you reference to one scientist and you can go from there if you're open minded

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lindzen

oh, and BTW

scientists get their funding for research from a variety of sources, public and private, neither of which disqualifies the science
you can't say, "oh, he's partially funded by exxon mobile and is biased" and not hold the same opinion of gov't sponsored scientists

[herbivor]

more so, just so long as is someone elses money



I read a fair share of them and like I said before, your links rebuttles are nothing more than grade school play ground Nuhhh Uhhhh, its cuz I saz its that waz...

Well I haven't seen anyone on here try and challenge the grade school rebuttles. I would love to be enlightened by all the convincing evidence you have that would contradict their points. Seriously, site some scientific studies. I'd love to read them.

[mrsleeve]

Because liberals are as money driven as Republicans.

more so, just so long as is someone elses money

^I would suppose by the statement you haven't read any of the links I posted which refutes nearly everything you just said in great detail with very logical data. I would also suppose by your tone that you think GW is some mass conspiracy conjured up by liberals

I read a fair share of them and like I said before, your links rebuttles are nothing more than grade school play ground Nuhhh Uhhhh, its cuz I saz its that waz...

[gwb72tii]

Because liberals are as money driven as Republicans.

ka-ching

winning

[joshh]

Why does the media regularly present human-caused global warming as proven science rather than the hypothesis it is? Why do our politicians write economy crippling legislation in the name of human-caused global warming?

Because liberals are as money driven as Republicans.

[Ryann]

Why does the media regularly present human-caused global warming as proven science rather than the hypothesis it is? Why do our politicians write economy crippling legislation in the name of human-caused global warming?

[herbivor]

^I would suppose by the statement you haven't read any of the links I posted which refutes nearly everything you just said in great detail with very logical data. I would also suppose by your tone that you think GW is some mass conspiracy conjured up by liberals for some mass world control. The only "alarming" part in the GW debate is the fact that all of this evidence is pouring in and a large portion of the common public refuse to accept it. If it looks like a duck and quack likes a duck, guess what? It's probably a fucking duck, not a zebra conspiring to look like a duck.

[gwb72tii]

How many black hippies do you know?

Regarding this subject entirely, I find it ironic that when a single science research paper may sparsely support the GW skeptic's position they are ready to jump on it and say "See, the science supports my position." But then continue to refute the thousands of other science documents that contradict their position.
People see what they want to see. I would love to believe that Global Warming is just another silly natural phenomenon but there is no evidence to support such beliefs. If you can find sufficient evidence then I would gladly change my position.

i don't think anyone here has argued man has NO impact, just that man is not the root cause of the climate changing.
there are plenty of scientists with a more acute understanding of the actual science than you or anyone here posses that are what you would describe as deniers. you refuse to believe them for whatever reason you have. and their opinions are not hard to find.
but you cannot discount them and say the science is settled or whatever.
there is no such thing as "settled" science.
what your side does is "alarm" as many as possible to further political goals of the left, like population control, CO2 offsets and other such crap.
and now the climate is doing something your sides infallible mathematical models did not predict - the climate has not warmed, and in many places it is cooling, like the shit up here in the PNW
thats why some of us choose not to believe, and are skeptical, of you and your sides arguments and "science".
your sides arguments are all conjecture unsupported by historical data or by their predictive power. no science has linked CO2 to causing warming. none. yet it has become your sides cause, along with fat fuck gore and his financial interests in companies related to CO2 offset trading.
open your eyes and your mind, you're being played.

[Farbin Kaiber]