Originally posted by cale
View Post
i have questioned their motives, and especially their ability to predict anything, their secrecy, their manipulation of data, their funding sources, the sheer stupidity of making a statement like "settled science"
and if you or herb or whoever stepped back from the politics of AGW and examined the data gathered in the real world, it doesn't support your predictions. so something is wrong in the original assumptions/conclusions
so far you haven't explained your way out of this corner
show us all, who are skeptical, where you've been correct about any of the science practiced by AGW climate scientists so far
so far your side has been caught lying, forging documents, hiding data, and fear mongering to further political ambitions.
keep the faith
Comment