Global Warming is over.

[BraveUlysses]

Pretty much every two weeks gwb seem to forget what has been posted and return to the same argument. Every single time.

[rwh11385]

Pretty much every two weeks gwb seem to forget what has been posted and return to the same argument. Every single time.

The hamster gets tired.


If he didn't "reset" every other week, then he'd have to answer the deeper questions he always avoids. It's not possible for him to operate on anything but a simple "nuh ugh" response.

[Thizzelle]

for every piece of electronic equpiment hippies buy, please plant a tree, thanks.

[cale]

well yes, and i always have
but let me pre-empt your response
can we all please end the "consensus" bullshit
it has been debunked in many studies, there is no 97% consensus on anything related to GW

You're a broken record. The consensus has been explained to you time and time again, you just choose to ignore it because it conflicts with your ability to have climate scientists on your side.

This is from a link YOU brought up. This isn't even the survey which saw the 97% consensus, yet it still shows the overwhelming majority to believe climate change to be anthropogenic.

http://coast.gkss.de/staff/storch/pdf/GKSS_2010_9.CLISCI.pdf

So tell me, if sources you cite for your arguments go completely against you because you fail to completely review them what do you have to bring to the table? You're making this too easy....

[gwb72tii]

here my canadian friend, this will help you understand the von storch report
its hardly an overwhelming consensus

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/What_consensus.pdf

also, i'm happy to see you've come all the way towards being reasonable as you appear to now agree the 97% is pure bullshit, something that has been held up here as an argument that skeptics are braindead

and i'm sorry to disappoint all you alarmists, but you can have your own opinions, not your own facts.

and make sure to get your coats before you leave, you too nando. here's one that doesn't agree.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/11/19/cooling-in-the-near-future/

[herbivor]

[Dozyproductions]

tinfoil hat/hate time! chemtrails and haarp cause global warming!

[cale]

here my canadian friend, this will help you understand the von storch report
its hardly an overwhelming consensus

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/What_consensus.pdf

also, i'm happy to see you've come all the way towards being reasonable as you appear to now agree the 97% is pure bullshit, something that has been held up here as an argument that skeptics are braindead

and i'm sorry to disappoint all you alarmists, but you can have your own opinions, not your own facts.

and make sure to get your coats before you leave, you too nando. here's one that doesn't agree.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/11/1...e-near-future/

I'm not conceding that, there IS a 97% consensus among the top players in climate science. That isn't an exaggeration, that's the results of a survey by one of the most reputable science organizations in the world the NAS.

[gwb72tii]

pls post a link to the "reputable" survey

[herbivor]

pls post a link to the "reputable" survey

Here you go. This study is a little dated. I think the current consensus amongst climatologists actively publishing is closer to 99%, but I haven't searched for a link to any formal study on that.
http://tigger.uic.edu/%7Epdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

To reiterate, the 97% consensus is amongst "climatologists actively performing research", not amongst all scientists, or the general public, which is maybe where you are getting your sources to cherry pick as usual.

I also found the NAS study which also shows the statistical surveys. Of the 2 to 3% that are not of the consensus, they also publish the least amount of work or are the least active in research. Of those that publishing numbers and research is above the statistical average, there is >99% consensus.

[cale]

National Academy of Sciences is corrupt, Heartland all the way.

[Fusion]

You know, you could just remove the carbon from the atmosphere, if it bothers you so much.

[cale]

That's a good idea, lets start with all the carbon that makes up the bodies of the deniers.

[Stephen]

Im not going to read this thread, but they should call it global menstruating, its more accurate.

[herbivor]

You know, you could just remove the carbon from the atmosphere, if it bothers you so much.

Whuhh??? Genius, oh tell us how so we can all be saved by the wrath of impending doom. ;)

BTW, I want a T-shirt.