Chick-fil-a

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rwh11385
    replied
    Originally posted by Exodus_2pt0
    You used a horrible comparison. It made you come off as the sort that uses shock to get a point across.

    I don't think anyone is arguing that, as many have said before... If you don't like it, don't buy it. That being said, again, it's not really any of our business what someone does with their own money. However, if you don't like it, don't give it to them. Problem solved.
    Cale turned what I said and was against just that: That it was wrong for me to judge a company's contributions when purchasing. I provided a clear example of why that stance of his was dumb.


    Originally posted by Cabriolet
    They don't as a company support certain causes. he as a person supports causes. just because i'm conservative/religious doesn't mean the paycheck from my company means they support my views.
    Actually, you're wrong: http://dynamodata.fdncenter.org/990p...1012_990PF.pdf

    The corporation directly supports WinShape, in addition to them personally supporting it. Maybe you should try finding facts next time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cabriolet
    replied
    Originally posted by rwh11385
    I questioned his assertion that it is wrong for me to judge a business's use of profits to support certain causes.
    They don't as a company support certain causes. he as a person supports causes. just because i'm conservative/religious doesn't mean the paycheck from my company means they support my views.

    Leave a comment:


  • Exodus_2pt0
    replied
    Originally posted by rwh11385
    I questioned his assertion that it is wrong for me to judge a business's use of profits to support certain causes.
    You used a horrible comparison. It made you come off as the sort that uses shock to get a point across.

    I don't think anyone is arguing that, as many have said before... If you don't like it, don't buy it. That being said, again, it's not really any of our business what someone does with their own money. However, if you don't like it, don't give it to them. Problem solved.

    Leave a comment:


  • rwh11385
    replied
    Originally posted by Exodus_2pt0
    I must be mistaken, because I swear you just compared Chick fil-a's stance on gay culture to conflict diamonds...
    I questioned his assertion that it is wrong for me to judge a business's use of profits to support certain causes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Exodus_2pt0
    replied
    I must be mistaken, because I swear you just compared Chick fil-a's stance on gay culture to conflict diamonds...

    Leave a comment:


  • rwh11385
    replied
    Originally posted by cale
    You're really going to try to equate this to genocide? The boldness in your attempt to find a parallel is amusing.
    Well, you missed my point so extremely and seemed to try to say that a consumer cannot make decisions based on what the company supports... so yeah. If you want to believe that, then why would YOU not buy diamonds that fund fighting?

    Is it audacious to take your business elsewhere because you don't want to support that?


    Tell me if it is or is not acceptable for a consumer to judge what a business supports with its profits when considering purchasing from them?? (make up your mind)
    Last edited by rwh11385; 08-01-2012, 03:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • cale
    replied
    Originally posted by rwh11385
    So question, would you buy conflict diamonds?
    You're really going to try to equate this to genocide? The boldness in your attempt to find a parallel is amusing.

    Leave a comment:


  • JinormusJ
    replied
    Originally posted by Cabriolet
    dude in no way does your argument for race have anything to do with sexual preference.
    TROOF

    Race =\= Sexual choice
    And I say choice very purposefully

    Leave a comment:


  • rwh11385
    replied
    Originally posted by cale
    ......and? You traded your money for a product, a product which you received. That's as far as your hold over the company goes, to give you the item they accepted your money for. Why the fuck do you have the audacity to believe that you get a say on how that money is then spent after it is no longer yours? I consider myself rather liberal, but if you truly think the company owe's you anything because of your personal beliefs then you're a fool.

    Perhaps I should go back to all the individuals who've bought past cars of mine and rally together with a few friends so the new owners paint them a color I'm more pleased with? I'm sure you'd hop on that bandwagon similarly to the ease at which you've climbed onto this one.
    So question, would you buy conflict diamonds?

    The point was that people buy from brands that support what they like, and shy away from ones that do the opposite. (That was alluded to a dozen or so words after what you quoted, did you not see that?) You can choose who to buy from going forward. Trying to twist what I said into retroactively controlling a business's profits is ridiculous. Is there something you guys are drinking that make all your arguments crazy?
    Last edited by rwh11385; 08-01-2012, 03:27 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • cale
    replied
    Originally posted by rwh11385
    Since those "other" people are one's customers or the consuming public.
    ......and? You traded your money for a product, a product which you received. That's as far as your hold over the company goes, to give you the item they accepted your money for. Why the fuck do you have the audacity to believe that you get a say on how that money is then spent after it is no longer yours? I consider myself rather liberal, but if you truly think the company owe's you anything because of your personal beliefs then you're a fool.

    Perhaps I should go back to all the individuals who've bought past cars of mine and rally together with a few friends so the new owners paint them a color I'm more pleased with? I'm sure you'd hop on that bandwagon similarly to the ease at which you've climbed onto this one.

    Leave a comment:


  • rwh11385
    replied
    Originally posted by Cabriolet
    dude in no way does you argument for race have anything to do with sexual preference.
    your*


    Actually, since the exact same arguments were used for both and it was based on ignorance and prejudice against other people's civil rights, I think they have a lot of similarities.

    Just imagine, you'd be the type against woman's suffrage and interracial marriage a few decades ago. Hopefully your kids won't judge you too hard when they ask you about this issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cabriolet
    replied
    dude in no way does your argument for race have anything to do with sexual preference.
    Last edited by Cabriolet; 08-01-2012, 03:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • JinormusJ
    replied
    I'd say more than fine... Manager just called me and 3 other people in tonight to work a 5 hour shift until 10; that makes 15 total people on staff tonight. Average number for a regular night? 5...
    You can imagine how crazy it was for lunch..
    In fact.. I might go in after my clinicals tonight for an after hour sandwich..

    Leave it to liberal media to give out the free publicity :up:

    Leave a comment:


  • Farbin Kaiber
    replied
    I'm heading out to eat there later this afternoon.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2761377
    replied



    it doesn't seem as if the boycott is working- there has never been a line out the door here before. what you can't see are the 12 cars in or trying to get in the drive through line. 13:40 1Aug2012. Irvine ca., a democratic enclave in otherwise red O.C.

    this foolish, politically motivated uproar over nothing will leave chick fil a just fine, whether or not they move into chicago or s.f.

    Leave a comment:

Working...