Chick-fil-a

[Cliche Guevara]

Fuck, Like I said before, I wanna be called a lesbian, I like the way it rolls off the tongue, and I don't think chicks whom are attracted to other chicks should hold that title without sharing it with the rest of us. It's not fair for them to think they are so special and not let us all use it to describe or identify with.

It's based on contorting terminology. Twisting the meaning of a term that describes one thing to describe other things that without the twisting would not be known by the spoken of term.

Like me and the use of lesbian. Just because I like chicks, using that term doesn't really work to describe my position, just like because homosexuals want to use the term marriage, even though it doesn't accurately describe the position they are coming from.

Your logic is inane. If two men walked up to you and told you they were married to each other you surely wouldn't be confused. Conversely, if you walked up to a stranger and told them you were a lesbian they would look at you, justifiably, like you're retarded.

[rwh11385]

Fuck, Like I said before, I wanna be called a lesbian, I like the way it rolls off the tongue, and I don't think chicks whom are attracted to other chicks should hold that title without sharing it with the rest of us. It's not fair for them to think they are so special and not let us all use it to describe or identify with.

It's based on contorting terminology. Twisting the meaning of a term that describes one thing to describe other things that without the twisting would not be known by the spoken of term.

Like me and the use of lesbian. Just because I like chicks, using that term doesn't really work to describe my position, just like because homosexuals want to use the term marriage, even though it doesn't accurately describe the position they are coming from.

You can call yourself a lesbian all you want, I don't care. I don't think anyone would give a crap.

But what I do care about is you being so self-centered that your mental conflict about the meaning of a word you gathered from societal influences which were largely based on close-minded religious extremists so that you want to restrict other people's liberties so you feel more comfortable about the world.

There's been plenty of bigots before you who were uncomfortable of the idea of people marrying across racial barriers and found against it because "it was wrong", only to have most of society realize it's fine.

Seriously, arguing against someone's pursuit of happiness because of semantics is childish and selfish, not to mention completely asinine. I hope this is just another trolling thread and you don't actually mean it, or I've lost all respect for you after starting your own business. No adult should be capable of actually putting their interpretation of vocabulary before someone else's civil rights. That's absolutely ridiculous.

[Farbin Kaiber]

Fuck, Like I said before, I wanna be called a lesbian, I like the way it rolls off the tongue, and I don't think chicks whom are attracted to other chicks should hold that title without sharing it with the rest of us. It's not fair for them to think they are so special and not let us all use it to describe or identify with.

It's based on contorting terminology. Twisting the meaning of a term that describes one thing to describe other things that without the twisting would not be known by the spoken of term.

Like me and the use of lesbian. Just because I like chicks, using that term doesn't really work to describe my position, just like because homosexuals want to use the term marriage, even though it doesn't accurately describe the position they are coming from.

[rwh11385]

From my standpoint, THIS HAS FUCKING NOTHING TO DO WITH RELIGION!!!

Then what is it based upon?

[rwh11385]

I know. Which are unconstitutional and therefore invalid.

I think you need to start using smaller words with him...

can they consent?

ffs, that argument is only used by the weakest minded of individuals.

Yup. But that's who adopts propaganda. They choose not to think for themselves, or much at all.

Its just a word that describes the meaning between a man and woman. How much fucking simpler can it get?

Gee, I thought marriage was a legal contract between two adults who care for each other and want to be together for life.

Has marriage fundamentally changed in Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, or Sweden? Or is it still the same concept, but now everyone can participate. Did the act or definition of voting change when previously disallowed people were given the opportunity to do so? The answer is no.

[Cliche Guevara]

From my standpoint, THIS HAS FUCKING NOTHING TO DO WITH RELIGION!!!

So you formed your opinions on marriage when you opened a dictionary? Again, please demonstrate that there is a causal link between gay marriage and the devaluation or marriage. Outside of allowing two men that love each other to marry there is no effect on the institution. If anything it strengthens it.

[Farbin Kaiber]

From my standpoint, THIS HAS FUCKING NOTHING TO DO WITH RELIGION!!!

[rwh11385]

what gets me is how you picked up hate out of that example. You are just arguing to argue at this point!

I think you forget I live in Miami.

Yeah, why would I ever think that someone who posts a lot about immigration as a negative and then talking about a growing Spanish population as a negative connotation... And I wasn't aware that complaining about minorities was okay on a region-by-region basis...

Actually, I'm not (arguing to argue) and think you two are absolutely ridiculous and are forgetting the principles American was founded upon, because of your personal beliefs or opinions. The nation was not started to oppress people with the majority's religion, but rather one of the reasons people were here was to escape religious oppression. Why then do RWNJ seek to take steps backwards?

[Cliche Guevara]

I wish we had one here, I've never eaten there.

[Kershaw]

So, you are saying you support Human & Pets/Livestock/Exotic Animals rights to form a contractual union?

can they consent?

ffs, that argument is only used by the weakest minded of individuals.

[Farbin Kaiber]

I'm gonna go eat at Chick-fil-A twice next Wednesday.

[Cliche Guevara]

No, I meant the exclusive definition of marriage in state constitutions.

I know. Which are unconstitutional and therefore invalid.

[FunfGan]

A state constitution can still have provisions (gay marriage bans) that violate the US Constitution, and under the Supremacy Clause the US Constitution usurps them.

No, I meant the exclusive definition of marriage in state constitutions.

[Vedubin01]

Hey, that's his boyfriend you insensitive fuck.

Im telling my mommy on you!

[Farbin Kaiber]

Hey, that's his boyfriend you insensitive fuck.