Chick-fil-a

[Farbin Kaiber]

It's got nothing to do with treating them as humans, that's a given. Nobody is calling them less than human, or even anything less than human. This is about those you speak of wanting to modify the meaning of a word to fit them instead of using a word that does fit that specific group.

[rwh11385]

Never said that minorities are a bad thing! Is it wrong? Not at all. Do I think the world would be better, of course not. I happen to be blond hair and green eyes. Damn just missed it! :?


And again compare apples to apples. If there is a recessive there is a dominate. Compare recessive to recessive and dominate to dominate. One would not be one if not for the other.

So compare left-handedness to being gay. Most people are right-dominate and most people are attracted to the opposite sex, but there's also less frequently occurring outcomes paired with those. If you treat people who eat with their left hand as human, do the same for guys who love guys. Shouldn't that be easy?? Haven't we learned to do that with minorities and women?


Or do you deny civil rights to lefties??

[Vedubin01]

So are you saying that minorities are a bad thing? Wrong? Do you think that the world would be better with less diversity? Or, no diversity? All blond with blue eyes? Because that is the message you seem to be sending.


Recessive genetic traits are never the majority in a population... but they are still normal or expected outcomes. So equating majority with "normal" is ridiculous.

Never said that minorities are a bad thing! Is it wrong? Not at all. Do I think the world would be better, of course not. I happen to be blond hair and green eyes. Damn just missed it! :?


And again compare apples to apples. If there is a recessive there is a dominate. Compare recessive to recessive and dominate to dominate. One would not be one if not for the other.

[squidmaster]

don't take it to such an extent. Categorize men to men and women to women. Since you are comparing same sex. (how many men have sex with other men vs. men having sex with women) etc...

And to an extent yes minorities are not normal. ex. it is not normal to find a Cuban in Alaska. It happens but not "normal"

Would it be wrong to find a Cuban in Alaska though? Normality doesn't always dictate correctness.

It's normal to smoke cigarettes for instance. But let's get off of the choice of doing something normal. Many lbgt people are born with a set chemistry that supports them through their love life. Much the same way that people have different aptitudes toward different subjects. It may not be the most common thing to have a gift for math, but it's not "wrong" or "against nature" or "gross." And to suggest that such a thing as being gay are wrong are ridiculous.

That seems more of a consequence than a reason. I was wondering what good it does society for the government to subsidize marriage if that is the case.

You can save money on filing taxes together. Also it's easier to list beneficiaries.

[rwh11385]

don't take it to such an extent. Categorize men to men and women to women. Since you are comparing same sex. (how many men have sex with other men vs. men having sex with women) etc...

And to an extent yes minorities are not normal. ex. it is not normal to find a Cuban in Alaska. It happens but not "normal"

So are you saying that minorities are a bad thing? Wrong? Do you think that the world would be better with less diversity? Or, no diversity? All blond with blue eyes? Because that is the message you seem to be sending.


Recessive genetic traits are never the majority in a population... but they are still normal or expected outcomes. So equating majority with "normal" is ridiculous.

[FunfGan]

This thread is gay.

:ohsnap:

[Vedubin01]

That seems more of a consequence than a reason. I was wondering what good it does society for the government to subsidize marriage if that is the case.

Its in the works to take away that deduction. I pretty sure the original thinking was that once you are married you the working husband would work and provide while your wife stayed home to raise your kids. They gave you a deduction for that like you can deduct your kids etc...

Today most households that are married are both working. Out of necessity or striving to live a better life.

[Farbin Kaiber]

Give birth to more taxpayers. To stay at the top of the pyramid, you gotta keep having new suckers buy into the the scheme.

[frankenbeemer]

Because you are taxed based off your status.

That seems more of a consequence than a reason. I was wondering what good it does society for the government to subsidize marriage if that is the case.

[Vedubin01]

So by your "logic", men are normal and women are not. And by definition, minorities are not normal.

I think some people over in Europe had a Solution for homosexuality and minorities that you might enjoy... but I don't think it's right.

don't take it to such an extent. Categorize men to men and women to women. Since you are comparing same sex. (how many men have sex with other men vs. men having sex with women) etc...

And to an extent yes minorities are not normal. ex. it is not normal to find a Cuban in Alaska. It happens but not "normal"

[Farbin Kaiber]

Farbin fighting the retarded noobs all alone like a boss.

If it wasn't so narcissistic, that would be my new sig.

[F34R]

Why is there so many members on here that think being a homosexual is normal? Dick in a mans ass does reproduce, but I guess the same goes for when I let a load loose in a girls face. Same sex marriage does not mean a damn thing, they will never have families that were started in a bedroom together.

Time to stir the pot ;)

Genesis 2:18-25

18 The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”

19 Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20 So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals.

But for Adam[a] no suitable helper was found. 21 So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs[b] and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib[c] he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.

23 The man said,

“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for she was taken out of man. ”
24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.

25 Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.

Farbin fighting the retarded noobs all alone like a boss.

[rwh11385]

Why is the government involved in marriage at all?

Good question. Probably because even though the nation is proud of its "separation of church and state", there's a lot of religious people who seek to oppress others through legislation.

[Jand3rson]

This thread is gay.

[Vedubin01]

I'm obviously missing something. Why is the government involved in marriage at all? Why should my rights be any different if I want to marry my dog?

Because you are taxed based off your status.