Chick-fil-a

[Turf1600]

Maybe my parallel was between Hispanics and Drunk Driving? Keep up, we were on the topic of protesting my business.

Careful, that kinda talk got jordan banned.

[rwh11385]

This is the first time that I've seen a parallel drawn between homosexuals and drunk drivers.

Otherwise, if you're advoicating population control - for which homosexuality may be a contributor - why would you protest nature? Wouldn't you instead sell them cake?

Me too, although this thread was the first analogy between gays and serial killers too...


I think he got lost in his trolling. Certainly hasn't found the other questions to answer.

[Farbin Kaiber]

What about these?





Are they unconstitutional, are people protesting locations that display these signs?

[rwh11385]

What about these?

Are they unconstitutional, are people protesting locations that display these signs?

Wow. Just jump from stupid argument to the next?

[Farbin Kaiber]

It's not an argument, it's a question. They did teach you the difference between those two things at that fancy University you went to, right?

[rwh11385]

It's not an argument, it's a question. They did teach you the difference between those two things at that fancy University you went to, right?

Now another pointless argument. The questions about refusing service to people not wearing shirt or shoes was a precursor to an argument about why they are allowed to do so. You asked if they were unconstitutional, which begged to differentiate why that is fine but discriminating against consumers based on protected minority status was not.

You actually made more sense when you were high all the time.

[Turf1600]

Why don't we just go ahead and segregate again?

[mrsleeve]

This is the first time that I've seen a parallel drawn between homosexuals and drunk drivers.

Otherwise, if you're advoicating population control - for which homosexuality may be a contributor - why would you protest nature? Wouldn't you instead sell them cake?

Why should you be surprised at a comparison of 2 different yet similarly socially stigmatized choices. You chose to drive drunk, just like its a choice where you put your cock. Not like your born driving drunk or light in the loafers.

[Cabriolet]

Are you saying that people shouldn't be able to "vote with their wallet"??

im saying you are giving too much of a fuck. there are other chicken places eat there.

[Turf1600]

Why You chose to drive drunk, just like its a choice where you put your cock. Not like your born driving drunk or light in the loafers.

That's a clever way to sidestep the "homosexuality is a choice" issue. Where you put your cock does not determine your sexual orientation, though. People are not born as drunk drivers.

[Good & Tight]

You guys still debating about this, lol. ! CFA is against gay marriages, are they not entitled to their honest belief? Would you rather them lie?
We live in a separated society and will continue to do so, at least in our lifetime.

[mrsleeve]

I think I was rather clear in my statement

[rwh11385]

CFA is against gay marriages, are they not entitled to their honest belief?

They can believe whatever they want, but don't expect people not to protest or boycott them. That's the people's right, especially in response to an unpopular stance about limiting people's civil rights.

[Turf1600]

I think I was rather clear in my statement

Yeah, so was I. People are born straight or gay. It's not simply a matter of "where they put their cock".

[mrsleeve]

Sorry I dont buy that.