Chick-fil-a

[Farbin Kaiber]

Where is heeter tearing apart your spelling errors?

Not the concept of marriage initially, but eventually. Just like the word gay. In sixty years, or a generation or two, marriage will mean two parties choosing to contractually exist together. So, theoretically, someone could marry Apple, or a robotic entity, or anything considered a "party" in a legal terminology basis.

You are not seeing the bigger, long term picture, this becomes a precedent.

[Cliche Guevara]

I did, quite a ways back. You just used the word. Gay no longer means happy.

I just want to be clear here. You're saying that by allowing gays to marry the concept of marriage will transform into something entirely different. Is that an accurate assessment of your argument?

[Farbin Kaiber]

You're arguing that by allowing gays to marry each other the concept of marriage loses its meaning. I'm asking you to justify that assertion. Seems perfectly reasonable to me.

I did, quite a ways back. You just used the word. Gay no longer means happy.

[Cliche Guevara]

You're arguing that by allowing gays to marry each other the concept of marriage loses its meaning. I'm asking you to justify that assertion. Seems perfectly reasonable to me.

[Farbin Kaiber]

Well, that's a fucking stupid question, it's obvious, gay marriage goes through, gets amended into the Constitution, and I come up with a new word to define a union between a man and a woman, and start a PAC to make it so. :rofl:

This whole thing is such a distraction to what's really going on, and it's the way to pull a Kansas City Shuffle. It's really sad that everyone is so occupied with the opinions of a family that owns a restaurant chain, and not the shit condition our country and financial well being is in.

More people are knowledgeable about Mariah Carey being the new judge on American Idol than knowing about our Executive Branch of government being tied up in Gun Running scandals.