Chick-fil-a
Collapse
X
-
You think homosexuality is wrong because an invisible man in the sky said so a few thousand years ago. That is not a justifiable reason to discriminate against a significant portion of the population. -
Really? Their food seemed outstanding for fast food. Chicken was not greasy and was real cuts of chicken unlike McD. I honestly enjoyed their food and I never eat fast food.
I am also a Christian but I believe they are Mormons or something. I think it is outstanding in this shock proof world we have now, that they still stand up for their beliefs. What good is a person if they don't stand fast in their word? Don't like it don't eat there, go drown yourself in Oreos or whatever gay pride supporting thing you wish to back. Not calling you out as homosexual supporter. I myself don't believe it is right, and will stand firmly in my beliefs. that does not mean I stop buying Oreos, or other products that support gay marriage. This will not hurt the Company at all, they could pull out of Boston and still pound out insane profits. I have NEVER in my life seen a place that serves fast food more packed. Well made food and EXCELLENT service, they are going to be just fine. Just retarded that some wind bag gets upset and starts a whirl wind effect to hinder their business.Leave a comment:
-
u gay bro?
Think of it like this. When you patronize an establishment you not only receive their product but you support them with your small contribution to their revenue. That's why people will support their local businesses by shopping at their store, because they want to keep them open. And that's why I won't eat at CFA, because I don't think their food is good enough to warrant my money being put towards their bigoted agenda.Leave a comment:
-
truthfully i was only extrapolating from other fast-food fecal mishaps. and yes, Taco Bell looks the same going out as it does going in.Leave a comment:
-
Not everyone, surely, but the clear trend is towards a consensus supporting gay marriage. Similar to slavery, woman's suffrage, and segregation, the vast majority of Americans will look back on this ridiculous argument and be ashamed that it was ever an issue.There will never be a time in any State in the world where everyone will agree on everything. Unless of course those is power decide to eliminate anyone with an opposing view point ( though try as they might, Hitler, Stalin, Kim Jong Il, etc just never seemed to be able to kill them all....)
orly?I hardly think wikipedia is a credible source of information.
It is a teacher's job to ensure that their students are not harassed. Part of that is preventing harassment based on sexual orientation. Surely you aren't suggesting that teachers should sit back while kids make fun of the gay kid or the kid with the gay parents, or that there actually is something wrong with being gay? I'm not trying to read something into your post that you don't mean, but that's what I'm getting out of it.this is because the public school system is instilling each and every student that being gay is perfectly fine when in reality that shouldn't be a subject that is taught in school. teachers need to focus on doing their jobs and not bring their political and or religious beliefs into the lives of other students.
Marriage is not about children, there are countless straight couples who marry with either no intention or no ability to have children. That argument is nonsensical.
I can't stand this horrifically uncompassionate argument. They aren't desperate for validation, you self-righteous prick, they're tired of being treated like second rate citizens.the only reason non-hetero's want to use the word is the societal acceptance it implies. they are still desperate for validation, no matter how much that motive is denied.Leave a comment:
-
-
i dont think i have to write anything for you guys to know where i stand on this.
:rofl:Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
^TBH, Chick-fil-A never has given me any bathroom issues, unlike the horror that is caused by even looking sideways at anything from Taco Bell.Leave a comment:
-
this is because the public school system is instilling each and every student that being gay is perfectly fine when in reality that shouldn't be a subject that is taught in school. teachers need to focus on doing their jobs and not bring their political and or religious beliefs into the lives of other students.
what is a teacher's job? perhaps teaching about historical bigotry and discrimination, and then perhaps to educate young minds about how things change for the better of those minority groups as society drops the hatred and progresses towards equality and respect for all?
i don't see anything sacred about marriage, much like how there is nothing sacred about chicken. for christ's sake, most heterosexual marriages end in disaster, akin to how most Chick-fil-A meals start as a pretty looking sandwich and end up being violently blasted all over the bathroom stall at a gas station 150 miles down the road.Leave a comment:
-
It really makes no sense to me why people won't eat there based on their beliefs.Leave a comment:
-
from the tool's laughable wiki quote-What is taken away from the idea of marriage if we allow same-sex marriage? You're insistent that if the definition is changed, even slightly, it becomes meaningless, but I fail to see how granting two men the right to marry has any impact on our understanding of the institution of marriage.
he proves himself and you wrong- "marriage" is about children. not to mention that the until recently accepted usage in American society has presumed such. al bundy wasn't 'married with shih tzu'.80] Furthermore, "matrimonium is an institution involving a mother, mater. The idea implicit in the word is that a man takes a woman in marriage, in matrimonium ducere, so that he may have children by her
the only reason non-hetero's want to use the word is the societal acceptance it implies. they are still desperate for validation, no matter how much that motive is denied.
it is pure politicized semantics.
hth
robert w.Leave a comment:


Leave a comment: