Good gun control policy in CA

[Farbin Kaiber]

So, what I find ironic is the claim that it's to protect the predatory bird population, while simultaneously, wind farms in California are filing for permits to annually kill migratory/predatory birds that are on the Endangered/Protected Species lists.

Fuck, I knew California was a stupid place.

[mrsleeve]

Slammins was clever and based on historical fact, your arguments and this law are based on piss poor logic, and are a means to an end no more no less.


But farb are they building Wind mills where the 14 reaming CA condors live. I wonder how many Turkey buzzards or Raptors and Eagles or Falcons suffer a similar fate with getting a free scavenged meal. I dont see anyone championing for them.

So the point to take away from all this is the lawmakers in CA are willing to gut a multibillion dollar a year industry (HUNTING/Fishing) Licensees generate 3.6B for the state annually ALONE. All because a few birds that have been dieing off for a long while now died prematurely. Willing to let the populations of game animals get out of hand and cause more harm than currently, willing to have more game animals suffer and not be recovered as often and running around wounded from piss poor projectiles. GOT IT seems way more humane that way, chalk one up for the greenies and WWF tards, way to go.

[einhander]

Slammins was clever and based on historical fact, your arguments and this law are based on piss poor logic, and are a means to an end no more no less.

Yes, but I baited all of you simpletons.

Furthermore, there's is no logic in this entire sub-forum. It's one giant cluster fuck of poorly written op-eds.

Also, hunting is lame.

[illest318i]

Also, hunting is lame.

LOL what is it with you and hunting is lame?

[mrsleeve]

^
hes just trolling and being a tool bag. Hes an elitist city slicker that thinks his self perceived position of moral superiority and way of life is the only correct way to go through life. based in his posts anyway Just like our long time troll Tijst or how ever he spells it.

BTW just because you initiate a conversation and get a response does not mean you played the "simpletons".

[einhander]

LOL what is it with you and hunting is lame?

Grown men covering themselves in camo, sitting in the dirt and bushes with each other, talking about their barrels and trigger pulls...to see who can shoot a bigger animal...it's so brokeback.

Just go to a gay club and be done with it.

[illest318i]

Grown men covering themselves in camo, sitting in the dirt and bushes with each other, talking about their barrels and trigger pulls...to see who can shoot a bigger animal...it's so brokeback.

Just go to a gay club and be done with it.

You know of any good gay clubs?!!

[Farbin Kaiber]

Grown men covering themselves in camo, sitting in the dirt and bushes with each other, talking about their barrels and trigger pulls...to see who can shoot a bigger animal...it's so brokeback.

Just go to a gay club and be done with it.

LOL, I sound the exact same way when talking about professional sports players and the fat junkie burnout "fans" that have no other life than playing Fantasy Football. The difference is a football fan will be able to provide you only with bean dip if the food distribution system were to collapse.

[einhander]

^
hes just trolling and being a tool bag. Hes an elitist city slicker that thinks his self perceived position of moral superiority and way of life is the only correct way to go through life. based in his posts anyway Just like our long time troll Tijst or how ever he spells it.

BTW just because you initiate a conversation and get a response does not mean you played the "simpletons".

Cletus, we are two sides of the same coin.

Your backwoods conservatism reeks of the same moral superiority as my coastal progressivism.

The only difference is that I recognize that and don't take myself too seriously.

I'm going back to reading my New Yorker and drinking my coffee.

[mrsleeve]

well my "conservatism" is not trying to encroach on your rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, as much as your coastal progressivism is trying to encroach on mine

[einhander]

Laugh.

Again, same coin: your desire for looser regulation and standards encroaches on the same thing for me.

Too much is bad, too little is bad.

[mrsleeve]

I fail to see how my procurement and keeping of firearms and related items infringes on your rights in any way whatsoever. Or any of the other 100m law abiding firearm owners in this country for that matter.

[einhander]

I fail to see how my procurement and keeping of firearms and related items infringes on your rights in any way whatsoever. Or any of the other 100m law abiding firearm owners in this country for that matter.

They're all law abiding until they shoot-up a school or blow their wives heads off. Then the victim(s) are really fucking infringed upon.

I have a gun and I agree with you, but you can't argue that there should be a one size fits all second amendment-based policy for ownership.

[frankenbeemer]

.... you can't argue that there should be a one size fits all second amendment-based policy for ownership.

Something to ponder. I wonder what restrictions you would propose for the second amendment? What about the first amendment and the fourth?

For instance: once free to roam society after a felony conviction, defending yourself with a gun is illegal. If society cannot trust a person with a firearm, why should we let them mingle with the "trustworthy" citizens like slammin?


/serious, begin troll

If you want to help the avian world, restrict/outlaw cat ownership.

Oh, yes. Football is gay. I'll go further than Farbin and say if I was Czar of the US, I would outlaw all professional sports. Go get a job or pick up trash along the road. This is the machine age, why don't we celebrate cerebral accomplishments the way we do physical ones?

[einhander]

Something to ponder. I wonder what restrictions you would propose for the second amendment? What about the first amendment and the fourth?

For instance: once free to roam society after a felony conviction, defending yourself with a gun is illegal. If society cannot trust a person with a firearm, why should we let them mingle with the "trustworthy" citizens like slammin?


/serious, begin troll

I wasn't talking about restricting amendments, you goof.