Wow. Why is this thread still alive?!

[einhander]

I did when I saw it bumped again. Plus I was up all night waiting to get in the car at 2am and drive to Ocean city. Sleep deprivation I say

There is a story there...

[Exodus_2pt0]

Who changed the title of the thread and why?

I did when I saw it bumped again. Plus I was up all night waiting to get in the car at 2am and drive to Ocean city. Sleep deprivation I say

[einhander]

Who changed the title of the thread and why?

Nothing better to do on a Friday night, I guess.

[frankenbeemer]

Who changed the title of the thread and why?

[einhander]

We keep agreeing on things....something is clearly wrong with the universe!

The person who changed the thread title....

[mrsleeve]

Incorrect entry procedures, Shoulda thrown a flashbang in first... But anyways that's pretty messed up.

Like SWAT in ATL did last month tossing a Flash Bang into a room blind on a no knock based on tip from "confidential informant" and having it land in a baby crib, with a baby in it??????? The hole in his chest is not healing well, and hes going to be permanently disfigured for his entire life for a fucked up needless raid. That the cops say was by the book and with in regulation

http://www.salon.com/2014/06/24/a_swat_team_blew_a_hole_in_my_2_year_old_son/

yeah I am with einhorn on this one

[einhander]

Incorrect entry procedures, Shoulda thrown a flashbang in first... But anyways that's pretty messed up.

Yeah! Flashbang a bunch of kids!

Someone plays too many first person shooters....

[BLACKCHARM88]

Incorrect entry procedures, Shoulda thrown a flashbang in first... But anyways that's pretty messed up.

[frankenbeemer]

ITT: Posters using Wikipedia to define a logical fallacy, then demonstrating that fallacy with their own argument.

[LSM3]

This thread is like beating a dead horse...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Welcome to the internet.

[Poorboyz]

This thread is like beating a dead horse...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

[LSM3]

Actually one opinion isn't as valid as another.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/valid


However, you are well within your rights to be wrong.

Actually I am referring to a SPECIFIC opinion NOT opinions in general. So yes our opinions in regards to this SPECIFIC topic are valid. That is if you use your provided definition...

Valid-

: fair or reasonable

: acceptable according to the law

His opinion (in regards to not search kids if an abundance of threats are called in) is reasonable and mine is acceptable according to the LAW....

Now if you don't agree with legal precedent than I'm sorry.

Thanks for playing..

However, you are well within your rights to be WRONG.

[z31maniac]

That's all I asked for. That's your opinion and it's just as valid as mine and I totally understand where your coming from. It's a fine line.

Actually one opinion isn't as valid as another.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/valid


However, you are well within your rights to be wrong.

[LSM3]

What if it had been a gun? There would be cries for more gun control and that would "solve the problem" of these mentally disturbed people causing harm to others. Knife control anyone? Should we be required to obtain a permit and register all sharp and pointy objects? Cut our tomatoes with a baseball bat? Oh wait, those can be dangerous too. That's how you do diversionary and hyperbole folks.

Back on topic, what would stop someone from calling in a "knife threat" or "lighter threat" or "big rock threat" on a daily basis causing a halt to all normal education while the police search everyone's stuff? I'd say if a threat was called in pointing out a specific student, that would be a more prudent use of time and resources seeing as how our students in public schools are legally subject to said search. Searching EVERYONE anytime a tip/threat is called in is just overboard, I guess that's where I draw the line. YMMV.

That's all I asked for. That's your opinion and it's just as valid as mine and I totally understand where your coming from. It's a fine line.

[ParsedOut]

What if it had been a gun? There would be cries for more gun control and that would "solve the problem" of these mentally disturbed people causing harm to others. Knife control anyone? Should we be required to obtain a permit and register all sharp and pointy objects? Cut our tomatoes with a baseball bat? Oh wait, those can be dangerous too. That's how you do diversionary and hyperbole folks.

Back on topic, what would stop someone from calling in a "knife threat" or "lighter threat" or "big rock threat" on a daily basis causing a halt to all normal education while the police search everyone's stuff? I'd say if a threat was called in pointing out a specific student, that would be a more prudent use of time and resources seeing as how our students in public schools are legally subject to said search. Searching EVERYONE anytime a tip/threat is called in is just overboard, I guess that's where I draw the line. YMMV.