No one needs 15 rounds

[marshallnoise]

The only purpose that high-capacity magazines serve is to make offensive killing easier. Period. You can fire more rounds at more targets in a shorter period of time while showing yourself in a defenseless posture (i.e. reloading) less frequently. In other words, it makes killing lots of people in a short time period easier. It has nothing to do with defensive shooting and everything to do with offensive shooting.

I don't think it matters what your opinion is. What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?

Restricting ammunition capacity is just another way to make sure the bad guys and the government are the only ones with guns. Control. Period.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[Roysneon]

You really want to go up against the military with its helicopters, tanks, RPG's, air to surface missiles, and nuclear fucking weapons with your full auto rifles?

Put the tin foil hat down, s'il vous plait.

[Vedubin01]

You really want to go up against the military with its helicopters, tanks, RPG's, air to surface missiles, and nuclear fucking weapons with your full auto rifles?

Put the tin foil hat down, s'il vous plait.

Afghanistan's have been doing it against our military for 10+ years. Whos winning that?

[marshallnoise]

Afghanistan's have been doing it against our military for 10+ years. Whos winning that?

Guerilla warfare. It's all that is needed to keep the government in check.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[BraveUlysses]

You really want to go up against the military with its helicopters, tanks, RPG's, air to surface missiles, and nuclear fucking weapons with your full auto rifles?

Put the tin foil hat down, s'il vous plait.

Like every coward, they're all talk and no action.

[marshallnoise]

Like every coward, they're all talk and no action.

Calling people cowards already? Big talk from someone who would never put your neck out for anyone.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[CorvallisBMW]

I don't think it matters what your opinion is. What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?

Restricting ammunition capacity is just another way to make sure the bad guys and the government are the only ones with guns. Control. Period.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

And what part of "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," do you not understand?

Does a restriction on hi-cap mags prevent you from owning a gun? No? Then it's not an infringement. Pretty fucking black-and-white.

[CorvallisBMW]

Afghanistan's have been doing it against our military for 10+ years. Whos winning that?

So you're just a terrorist-in-waiting? Paging the FBI...

[z31maniac]

And what part of "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," do you not understand?

Does a restriction on hi-cap mags prevent you from owning a gun? No? Then it's not an infringement. Pretty fucking black-and-white.

And since we have the most powerful and well-funded military in the world, by an order of magnitude, a well-regulated militia is hardly necessary for our security.

[marshallnoise]

And what part of "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," do you not understand?

Does a restriction on hi-cap mags prevent you from owning a gun? No? Then it's not an infringement. Pretty fucking black-and-white.

A gun with a severely restricted ammunition capacity, other than what was designed (like a revolver), renders the gun a blunt instrument and no longer a firearm built for its intended purpose. It is an infringement. All restrictions of how a gun operates is an infringement.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[marshallnoise]

So you're just a terrorist-in-waiting? Paging the FBI...

To you, yes. To someone who understands the constitution and the very nature of liberty, a patriot.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[marshallnoise]

And since we have the most powerful and well-funded military in the world, by an order of magnitude, a well-regulated militia is hardly necessary for our security.

Read what our founders wrote in the federalist and anti federalist papers. What was common to them has become foreign to us today. They wrote the constitution in a very specific manner in a time where tyranny was very real.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[z31maniac]

A gun with a severely restricted ammunition capacity, other than what was designed (like a revolver), renders the gun a blunt instrument and no longer a firearm built for its intended purpose. It is an infringement. All restrictions of how a gun operates is an infringement.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

Should I be allowed to own an RPG?

Read what our founders wrote in the federalist and anti federalist papers. What was common to them has become foreign to us today. They wrote the constitution in a very specific manner in a time where tyranny was very real.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

Tyranny is still very real, but it's not like a 15 round magazine is going to defeat the US Army when they instill martial law............

I'm really curious why you guys seriously seem to get off on the idea that any of this would matter if the US gov't decided to turn the military on the people.

[Vedubin01]

Should I be allowed to own an RPG?

Legally you can if you go though the right channels...

[marshallnoise]

Should I be allowed to own an RPG?



Tyranny is still very real, but it's not like a 15 round magazine is going to defeat the US Army when they instill martial law............

I'm really curious why you guys seriously seem to get off on the idea that any of this would matter if the US gov't decided to turn the military on the people.

Yes. I believe you should be allowed to own an rpg.

It's not one person. It's 15% of the population ad individuals. That's what it took to defeat the British.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk