Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Hillary wins, they better expand Gitmo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    Originally posted by marshallnoise View Post
    But at what expense?
    Zero. That's the whole point. The only people background checks prevent from getting guns is those who can't pass them. I can only assume that since you're so terrified of them you must be unable to pass one.

    Comment


      #77
      Originally posted by CorvallisBMW View Post
      Zero. That's the whole point. The only people background checks prevent from getting guns is those who can't pass them. I can only assume that since you're so terrified of them you must be unable to pass one.
      Hahahahahahahahahaha! I am squeaky clean dude. However, I have fears of an overly obtrusive government and a healthy respect for the potential of tyranny.

      Not a problem for you because you like the nanny state and all of it's encumbrances. However, the government loves keeping it's opposition down and defenseless.

      Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
      Si vis pacem, para bellum.

      New Hawtness: 1995 540i/6 Claptrap
      Defunct too: Cirrusblau m30 Project
      Defunct (sold): Alta Vista

      79 Bronco SHTF Build

      Comment


        #78
        Originally posted by CorvallisBMW View Post
        Zero. That's the whole point. The only people background checks prevent from getting guns is those who can't pass them. I can only assume that since you're so terrified of them you must be unable to pass one.
        It amazes me how you continue to miss the point, keep living in your "Everything is Awesome" bubble...for your sake I hope it never pops.

        Comment


          #79
          Originally posted by CorvallisBMW View Post
          The only people background checks prevent from getting guns is those who can't pass them.
          Except that they don't.

          And having the system opens the door for all sorts of good fun in the future.

          Comment


            #80
            Originally posted by smooth View Post
            The only position I've held in these discussions is that doing a better job of regulating firearms can have a positive impact on lowering the murder rate and some forms of lethal violence.
            Originally posted by The Dark Side of Will View Post
            What brings you to this conclusion?

            Comment


              #81
              Best at work reading ever.
              BroWorks.com Bro is a lifestyle

              Comment


                #82
                Originally posted by marshallnoise View Post
                Hahahahahahahahahaha! I am squeaky clean dude. However, I have fears of an overly obtrusive government and a healthy respect for the potential of tyranny.

                Not a problem for you because you like the nanny state and all of it's encumbrances. However, the government loves keeping it's opposition down and defenseless.

                Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
                You have no idea what tyranny is!
                2011 1M Alpine white/black
                1996 Civic white/black
                1988 M3 lachs/black

                Comment


                  #83
                  Originally posted by einhander View Post
                  You have no idea what tyranny is!
                  Most people just say "bump."

                  Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
                  Si vis pacem, para bellum.

                  New Hawtness: 1995 540i/6 Claptrap
                  Defunct too: Cirrusblau m30 Project
                  Defunct (sold): Alta Vista

                  79 Bronco SHTF Build

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X