Enough about guns, what's with all the illegal immigrants!?

[einhander]

Who would that be? Certainly not you.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

Ceasefire for 48 hours?

[marshallnoise]

Don't worry, I won't.

Someone has to subsidize your mortgage.

Who would that be? Certainly not you.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[einhander]

You suck at condescension. Don't quit your day job.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

Don't worry, I won't.

Someone has to subsidize your mortgage.

[marshallnoise]

he is fun though much more so than the others

Mildly amusing.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[mrsleeve]

he is fun though much more so than the others

[2761377]

You suck at condescension. Don't quit your day job.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

he uses erudition to hide the fact he's a troll. well educated and skilled at argument, but still a troll.

[marshallnoise]

How cute.

You suck at condescension. Don't quit your day job.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[einhander]

Read books too bro.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

How cute.

[marshallnoise]

Laughing.

I bet you watch the History Channel a lot, too.

Is that dumb? Read books too bro.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[einhander]

Winston Churchill

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

Laughing.

I bet you watch the History Channel a lot, too.

[marshallnoise]

Do you have a book of Rush Limbaugh quotes and sayings for use on R3v?

Winston Churchill

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[einhander]

"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."

You want equality for all? Remove the rich man and the populist from political power.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

Do you have a book of Rush Limbaugh quotes and sayings for use on R3v?

[einhander]

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nation...707-story.html

I enjoyed the last statement most of all.

"With today’s decision, a three judge appellate panel, appointed by Presidents Carter, Clinton and Obama, disregarded judicial precedent and procedure. This continues us down a dangerous path in which the courts and the President—not Congress—make our nation’s laws."

Forest. Trees. You see neither.

DACA gave immigrants who were brought to the United States before they were 16 some legal status so they are not deported, though far less than a path to citizenship than some in the immigrant-rights community had sought.

The group of children are known as Dreamers. There were a number of other requirements to participate in the DACA program, such as a high school diploma or the equivalent or an honorable discharge from the U.S. armed forces. To be eligible, the individuals could not be a threat to public safety or be convicted of a significant misdemeanor or any felony. They were also required to seek employment documents.

The affected are part of a contingent of migrants who are contributing to society.

The issue you should be concerned about is state's rights, which were essentially trampled. Maybe that's what you mean, but, as usual, it is difficult to follow your bluster. If you would post something substantive about the issue, rather than typing some masturbatory fuckery about yourfeelingsgovernmenttyrannyblackhelicopterconspi racy, then it would be possible to engage in a discussion - and I wouldn't be forced to enliven your threads.

[ParsedOut]

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-arizona-drivers-licenses-immigrants-20140707-story.html

I enjoyed the last statement most of all.

"With today’s decision, a three judge appellate panel, appointed by Presidents Carter, Clinton and Obama, disregarded judicial precedent and procedure. This continues us down a dangerous path in which the courts and the President—not Congress—make our nation’s laws."

[anabolice30]

because it is something to be striving for! what happens is people who "dwell on the past" and cant move forward get scared because some crusty old white guys are not in every position of power. then pass laws that make it harder for any other race to be elected by making college stupidly expensive so most are not able to get any form of higher education. any other form of social disruption works too (drug war). im not saying that everyone needs to be paid the exact same and we must all share cars comrade!!! just everyone needs to have the same doors be able to be open for them to take advantage of.

You just keep spouting rhetoric, like, could you please explain what laws are being passed to keep colored people out of college? And could you please explain what a private, for profit, institution would gain by keeping minorities out? And also could you explain how everyone can have the same amount of doors open for them, when not everyone exists in the same social circle, is born with the same skillset, same IQ, and same financial class?