Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So this quietly happened

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    So this quietly happened



    http://www.thenation.com/blog/181590/senate-tried-overturn-citizens-united-today-guess-what-stopped-them#


    A majority of the United States Senate has voted to advance a constitutional amendment to restore the ability of Congress and the states to establish campaign fundraising and spending rules with an eye toward preventing billionaires and corporations from buying elections.
    “was a historic day for campaign finance reform, with more than half of the Senate voting on a constitutional amendment to make it clear that the American people have the right to regulate campaign finance,” declared Senator Tom Udall, the New Mexico Democrat who in June proposed his amendment to address some of the worst results of the Supreme Court’s interventions in with the recent Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission decisions, as well as the 1976 decision in Buckley v. Valeo.
    That’s the good news.
    The bad news is that it’s going to take more than a majority to renew democracy.
    Fifty-four senators, all Democrats and independents who caucus with the Democrats, voted Thursday for the amendment to clarify in the Constitution that Congress and the states have the authority to do what they did for a century before activist judges began intervening on behalf of wealthy donors and corporations: enact meaningful campaign finance rules and regulations.
    But forty-two senators, all Republicans, voted no. As a result, Udall noted, the Republican minority was able to “filibuster this measure and instead choose to support a broken system that prioritizes corporations and billionaires over regular voters.”
    The Republican opposition effectively blocked further consideration of the amendment proposal, since sixty votes were needed to end debate and force a vote. And, even if the Republicans had not filibustered the initiative, actual passage of an amendment would have required a two-thirds vote.
    Though the Republican move was anticipated, Senator Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independent who has been one of the Senate’s most ardent advocates for reform, expressed frustration with the result. “I am extremely disappointed that not one Republican voted today to stop billionaires from buying elections and undermining American democracy,” said the senator, who has advocated for a more sweeping amendment to address the influence and power of corporate cash on American elections and governance. “While the Senate vote was a victory for Republicans, it was a defeat for American democracy. The Koch brothers and other billionaires should not be allowed to spend hundreds of millions of dollars electing candidates who represent the wealthy and the powerful.“
    Now, said Sanders, “the fight to overturn Citizens United must continue at the grassroots level in every state in this country.”
    Sanders is right to reference the role of grassroots movements.
    Four years ago, when the US Supreme Court removed barriers to corporate spending to buy elections, serious reformers said a constitutional amendment would be necessary to reverse the Court’s Citizens United ruling. Most pundits and politicians, even those who recognized the threat posed to democracy by the opening of the floodgates for big money, dismissed a constitutional fix as too bold and too difficult to achieve.
    But the people embraced the constitutional route to reform. Grassroots organizing succeeded in getting sixteen states and close to 600 communities to formally demand that Congress act.
    At the same time, the money poured in, with campaigning spending breaking records in the 2012 presidential and congressional elections—and heading toward breaking the record for midterm elections in 2014.
    That was enough to shake up even the most cautious Senate Democrats, who began moving earlier this year to advance the Udall amendment. Though activists wanted a stronger amendment, the Senate deliberations confirmed that there is broad support for a constitutional response to the money-in-politics mess—and that a substantial number of senators now see that constitutional response as right and necessary.
    “Less than five years after the Citizens United decision sparked national outrage, we have seen the movement to get big money out of politics go from local, grassroots organizing to a vote in the United States Senate,” explained People for the American Way Executive Vice President Marge Baker, who worked with activists from Public Citizen, Common Cause, Free Speech for People and other groups to collect and deliver 3.2 million signatures on petitions supporting an amendment. “Today’s historic majority vote is a remarkable milestone for this movement and a platform for taking the fight to the next level. The debate in the Senate this week is a debate that Americans across the country who are passionate about fixing our broken democracy have wanted to see.”
    With the DC debate done, for now, the fight goes back to the grassroots. Activists with groups such as Move to Amend, Public Citizen’s “Democracy is for People” campaign and Free Speech for People will continue to organize and agitate, not just for an amendment but for an amendment that makes it absolutely clear that money is not speech, that corporations are not people and that citizens have a right to organize elections where votes matter more than dollars.
    “We have amended the US Constitution before in our nation’s history. Twenty-seven times before. Seven of those times to overturn egregious Supreme Court rulings. For the promise of American democracy, we can and we will do it again,” declared John Bonifaz, the president of Free Speech for People, said Thursday. “The pressing question before the nation today is whether it is ‘we the people’ or ‘we the corporations and big money interests.’ This not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue. This is a deeply American issue. Whatever our political differences may be, we all share the common vision of government of, for, and by the people. Today’s US Senate vote is just the beginning. While this amendment bill did not receive this time the required two-thirds support in order to pass the Senate, we will be back again and again until we win. History is on our side.’
    text of the ammendment; Vague but sweet.


    #2
    Nothing happened. The republicans filibuster blocked it.

    The bad news is... forty-two senators, all Republicans, voted no. As a result, Udall noted, the Republican minority was able to “filibuster this measure and instead choose to support a broken system that prioritizes corporations and billionaires over regular voters.”
    The Republican opposition effectively blocked further consideration of the amendment proposal, since sixty votes were needed to end debate and force a vote. And, even if the Republicans had not filibustered the initiative, actual passage of an amendment would have required a two-thirds vote.

    Comment


      #3
      Yes but me thinks those billionaires and big corps would get to write their own legislation AGAIN. Who do you think paid for all those D's campaign's to get there???? They are not going to bite the hand that feeds them publicly, with out rewarding them in a big way on the back end or under the table.

      I would suspect this is purely a stunt OR this will convolute the system even more if it were to ever pass.
      Originally posted by Fusion
      If a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
      The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de Tocqueville


      The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken

      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
      William Pitt-

      Comment


        #4
        true nothing happened but I hope this was more than a pr stunt. I didn't hear any mention of this at all on the msm. The wording of the amendment seemed pretty open ended like the originals but with enough specificity to get to the point. *sigh*

        Comment


          #5
          It amazes me that people still vote for these people that call themselves republican. They're not republicans. I don't know what they are but they're sure not republicans. They bribe us with lax gun laws and cheap taxes while they pick apart every other aspect of our lives.

          Comment


            #6
            Yet the Dems want strict gun laws, high taxes, wish to pick apart every aspect of our lives and offer only Govt hand outs to those unwilling to take care of themselves as a bribe.

            I dont like either party,
            Originally posted by Fusion
            If a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
            The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de Tocqueville


            The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken

            Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
            William Pitt-

            Comment


              #7
              Oh believe me I'm well aware, I live in NY.

              Comment


                #8
                It's time for a Libertarian revolution, too bad that means taking responsibility for one's self...don't see that gaining any traction in our current society.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by mrsleeve View Post

                  I dont like either party,
                  2011 1M Alpine white/black
                  1996 Civic white/black
                  1988 M3 lachs/black

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by ParsedOut View Post
                    It's time for a Libertarian revolution, too bad that means taking responsibility for one's self...don't see that gaining any traction in our current society.

                    As long as girls can kill instructors with uzis we'll never have libertarian revolutions. ;) Such an amendment like this would of been the first step though.

                    As an amendment I thought this was cleverly worded but not clearly enough for that libertarian revolucia. I thought Ron Pauls approach was dead on with slashing a good many departments and the budget in defense. But a couple of buddies and I talked about how since the federal government is so strong that all departments and agencies act as sort of mini serfdoms striving to keep or expand their own budgets. The vision of representing the better good for the nation gets convoluted by the greater good for each little serfdom. A paradox in which having a strong federal government comes a weak government faced with gridlock and prone to inside/outside money to feed the countless headed hydra. We get billed with the negatives from each situation.

                    Just a sunday, while watching football, thought
                    Last edited by Dozyproductions; 09-14-2014, 01:28 PM.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Not that you yokels read or anything, but the current issue of Foreign Affairs has a series of solid articles on the decline of American government.

                      Check it out if you can peel yourselves away from Guns & Ammo.
                      2011 1M Alpine white/black
                      1996 Civic white/black
                      1988 M3 lachs/black

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Read it; was called 'Gladiator', the movie.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X