Baltimore riots

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BraveUlysses
    No R3VLimiter
    • Jun 2007
    • 3781

    #61
    no, i don't because your posts are mostly incomprehensible.

    "if they are indicted" implies that you don't understand that they have been charged and warrants for arrest have been issued.

    It's also not realistic to assume that a city would open itself to the liability of charging police officers just to appease the public and be fully committed to actually prosecuting them

    Comment

    • jalopi
      Banned
      • Aug 2010
      • 2370

      #62
      did you mean this?

      Originally posted by BraveUlysses
      It's also not realistic to assume that a city would open itself to the liability of charging police officers just to appease the public and be fully committed to actually prosecuting them
      or this?

      Originally posted by BraveUlysses
      It's also not realistic to assume that a city would open itself to the liability of charging police officers just to appease the public and not be fully committed to actually prosecuting them
      because we're playing the "i can't understand your posts without busting your balls over minor vocabulary and/or grammatical errors" game, right?

      Comment

      • BraveUlysses
        No R3VLimiter
        • Jun 2007
        • 3781

        #63
        Congratulations, you got me!

        Comment

        • jalopi
          Banned
          • Aug 2010
          • 2370

          #64
          goddammit you're such a dick, for some reason i can't hate you though

          Comment

          Working...