Gary Johnson

[Eric]

What a waffleswaffleswaffleswaffles


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Eric]

C u n t


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BraveUlysses]

Its just proof that if you say something enough no matter how outlandish it may be, it will make it true enough to have the desired result. With the media on the side of Hillary and pushing her this hard, and the fact she raised over a hundred mill last month, despite all the BS surrounding her. Nothing will stick to her, because those in control of those agencies were appointed by the guy that wants her as his successor, not to mention they dont want to suddenly decide to shoot them selves in the back of the head or end up in a "aviation accident".....

But yes until the election you cant trust most of what the "media" main stream or other wise is telling us. Hell can you even trust the election who knows, it may be like it was in 1980, it may be like it was in 2000 with the ballot dingle berries again, who knows. Its going to be a interesting ride, and we are prolly going to be screwed no matter the outcome......

hillary is not the candidate you should criticize about scandals not sticking, because you can clearly see that there's a large voting block that will vote for trump, no matter how many time he changes his stance or contradicts himself.

citing conspiracy theories doesnt make your comments any stronger

It is also sad that you seem to imply being willing to vote for a entitled (its MY TURN), corrupt, the law does not apply to me, ethic-less, lies to congress and the electorate UNDER OATH, thieving, sack of shit, that could not "figure" out how Hotmail works. All because you are scarred someone that is not on the inside of the political scene and oh noes 1 percenter wants to make a run at it.

Nope, no matter what I'm voting for GJ, just like in 2012.

Hillary/Bill and Trump are 1%ers, so i'm not sure what your point is.

[Garage30]

Sucks the libertarian party doesn't gain more foothold, it fits the Us perfectly imo. Crazy that it has trouble breaking 15% with the two most hated candidates ever. However it sucks even more being a libertarian in europe though:(

[mrsleeve]

hillary is not the candidate you should criticize about scandals not sticking, because you can clearly see that there's a large voting block that will vote for trump, no matter how many time he changes his stance or contradicts himself.

citing conspiracy theories doesnt make your comments any stronger



Nope, no matter what I'm voting for GJ, just like in 2012.

Hillary/Bill and Trump are 1%ers, so i'm not sure what your point is.

I am not sure how changing a stance or opinion = scandal compared to, lying to congress under oath umpteen times, Libya, Top secret email on unsecured servers, deleting damming emails that are part of the public record, health concerns, pay to play, skimming large amounts (hundreds of millions) off the top of a Non profit charity.... etc...

I am fully aware they are all 1%ers, seems much of the electorate don't know/care that the waffleswaffleswaffleswaffles/bill are, and that's literately what T is famous for pre reality show/political run fame....

[gwb72tii]

when you get your news from Vox i understand why trump is ugly

[BraveUlysses]

I am not sure how changing a stance or opinion = scandal compared to, lying to congress under oath umpteen times, Libya, Top secret email on unsecured servers, deleting damming emails that are part of the public record, health concerns, pay to play, skimming large amounts (hundreds of millions) off the top of a Non profit charity.... etc...

I am fully aware they are all 1%ers, seems much of the electorate don't know/care that the waffleswaffleswaffleswaffles/bill are, and that's literately what T is famous for pre reality show/political run fame....

nice gish gallop.

Back to the main point--I'm not scared of trump enough to vote for hillary but you're scared enough of hillary to vote for an idiot who couldn't pass a 5th grade test on the bill of rights. so much for you and your supposed principles.

when you get your news from Vox i understand why trump is ugly

come out from under your bridge and read any goddamn newspaper on any given day and you'll find dozens of reasons why trump is a shitty candidate.

[BECKSTER]

come out from under your bridge and read any goddamn newspaper on any given day and you'll find dozens of reasons why trump is a shitty candidate.

There's plenty of reasons why Gary is a lot shittier.

I could elaborate, but I don't want to spam your thread.

[BraveUlysses]

it's not my thread

post it up

[DEV0 E30]

There's plenty of reasons why Gary is a lot shittier.

I could elaborate, but I don't want to spam your thread.

Thanks for pulling me in to post in this subforum that I don't see the point of posting in to say...

How the hell do you figure that?

[mrsleeve]

Still like gary a lot, and I would like to see some of these reasons T would be better.........

[BECKSTER]

1. Gary Johnson believes Hillary Clinton is a "Wonderful Public servant."
(That right there should show you how far out his mind is.)

2. If elected President he will empliment mandatory vaccines that will be executed with force which violates the "non-aggression principle" that his party made.

3. He's all for emplimenting a "Carbon Tax."

4. He has no intentions of securing our border.

5. If your a Jew cake baker and don't want to bake a cake for a nazi wedding your bakery will be shut down.

6. Seeing that he raised the debt as governor in New Mexico from 1.8 billion to 4.8 billion shows you he can manage money very well.

These aren't huge reasons, but add them all together and you'll see he's nothing but another socialist clown.
Feel free to point out any mistakes you see here.

[BraveUlysses]

well lets start with the first mistake, emplement

1. ok? who cares?

2. pretty sure he doesn't support mandatory vaccinations (anti-vaxxers are stupid pieces of shit)

3. think he walked this one back as of last week, does not support it

4. that's fairly standard for most libertarians

5. http://reason.com/blog/2016/05/23/ga...ics-within-the

[roguetoaster]

1. He's right, she has been a fair public servant (wonderful is just making nice) as she has devoted almost her entire life to public work/office. Not that it wasn't for the ultimate goal that she is now going for.

2. Do you equate law with force, because making something a law is forcing people to do it or face some sort of consequences. It should also be realized that no president can act unilaterally on something like this.

3. Carbon taxes hurt the national interest and don't really reduce pollution, as with carbon offsets. At least he has some designs to continue to safeguard our environment even if they are misguided.

4. Why in the world do we need to "secure" our border at all? You realize that for multiple decades you could freely cross in both directions and it didn't do any real harm (unless you want the USA to stay "pure" or some such nonsense). Look at the EU, open borders encourage cooperation and encourage freedom of movement/ideas/trade. Just look at what airport "security" does for us, and ask yourself if we are actually safer for it in that very visible, but not very effective guise.

5. The idea is to broaden the definitions of discrimination and open service. It's not about Nazis and Jews, but rather an expansion of the simple idea that anyone should be able to go to any store and purchase what they provide freely.

6. No idea what side of the truth that one falls on.

I do wish that a third party could mount a more cohesive campaign and after adopting a plank or set of positions just stick to it unless there are sound reasons to change the stance.

[BECKSTER]

well lets start with the first mistake, emplement

1. ok? who cares?

2. pretty sure he doesn't support mandatory vaccinations (anti-vaxxers are stupid pieces of shit)

3. think he walked this one back as of last week, does not support it

4. that's fairly standard for most libertarians

5. http://reason.com/blog/2016/05/23/ga...ics-within-the

1. I care, most people care.

2. Your calling my mom a stupid piece of sh*t. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ okay.

3. Not sure why he was ever for it.

4. I'm sure if we put a tax on entering the country, Liberatarians would be pro-build-a-wall.