Crickets

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    i was clearly talking about obama taking the issue of syria up with congress, which is why i posted that chart. i'm not talking about the ban.

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    he went to congress and they said don't do it

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by gwb72tii
    It has been long established that it is within the President's authority to limit immigration from wherever he chooses. I would argue Trump didn't appeal because gorsuch hadn't been appointed/confirmed.
    what does this have to do with my post that you quoted

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    he went to congress and they said don't do it

    republicans overwhelmingly support military strikes in syria when they are done by a republican president but not under a democrat

    It has been long established that it is within the President's authority to limit immigration from wherever he chooses. I would argue Trump didn't appeal because gorsuch hadn't been appointed/confirmed.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by gwb72tii
    so where's the complex issue with improved vetting of immigrants from countries with active terrorist organizations hostile to the USA identified by our own brown skinned President? and too bad with messing with travel plans. get over it, it's a big fucked up world

    edit: 8 years of a modern day Neville Chamberlin being head of the USA led to Trump's tomahawking of Syria. Obama's lack of a backbone, of following through with "promises" to act when Syria crossed a red line ia why Trump did what he did. Hoorah
    he went to congress and they said don't do it

    republicans overwhelmingly support military strikes in syria when they are done by a republican president but not under a democrat

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by rhE-30
    He did not act to improve dick. He attacked a complex issue with a oversimplified view of the problem with out a thought or logical plan and messed a bunch of legal citizens and residents international travel. In addition to that his rhetoric created tension between races. It can clearly observed there was no thought put into attacking Syria or sending a fleet to North Korea. China and Russia put that bitch in check, so it was back to picking on the brown people in the middle east. Awesome job.
    so where's the complex issue with improved vetting of immigrants from countries with active terrorist organizations hostile to the USA identified by our own brown skinned President? and too bad with messing with travel plans. get over it, it's a big fucked up world

    edit: 8 years of a modern day Neville Chamberlin being head of the USA led to Trump's tomahawking of Syria. Obama's lack of a backbone, of following through with "promises" to act when Syria crossed a red line ia why Trump did what he did. Hoorah
    Last edited by gwb72tii; 04-17-2017, 06:41 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • rhE-30
    replied
    Originally posted by 2761377
    LOL- the President acts to improve vetting for immigrants from countries on a list compiled by the Obama administration and the hysterical Left cries "Muslim immigration Ban".

    and OP could use a better understanding of the internal Mexican politics that encourage illegal immigration. ethnic Spaniards seek the cleanse their country of "Indios"








    MAGA 304-227
    He did not act to improve dick. He attacked a complex issue with a oversimplified view of the problem with out a thought or logical plan and messed a bunch of legal citizens and residents international travel. In addition to that his rhetoric created tension between races. It can clearly observed there was no thought put into attacking Syria or sending a fleet to North Korea. China and Russia put that bitch in check, so it was back to picking on the brown people in the middle east. Awesome job.

    Leave a comment:


  • ahrensNW
    replied
    Originally posted by BECKSTER
    Why is that?
    Because I think building a border wall will help keep out drugs and people who will harm innocent American's?
    Why would we want to keep out drugs? Asshole.
    Last edited by ahrensNW; 04-15-2017, 05:01 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • LBJefferies
    replied
    It's awfully quiet in here. I guess it's no fun complaining about golf trips, criticizing America, bombing in the Middle East, legislative failure, etc. when there's not a black Democrat in office. Now it's a Republican doing it so there's nothing to see here.

    Leave a comment:


  • flyboyx
    replied
    ahhh jeeeeez! i guess agent let you out of your cage. time will tell if that proves wise or not. i'm betting on it being a bad idea.


    i assume you started this thread to stir the pot a bit? well, the election is over. your douchebag lost. another one won instead. can't be any worse, only different. do we really need to hash this over any more? are you like 18 years old or something?
    Last edited by flyboyx; 02-10-2017, 11:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kershaw
    replied
    How is that even going to be accomplished though? My grandmother has told me stories of traveling over to East Berlin for shopping because the goods were cheaper over there, apparently everyone did it.

    Walls don't stop anything. They just create animosity.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by BECKSTER
    Why is that?
    Because I think building a border wall will help keep out drugs and people who will harm innocent American's?

    Because I think halting immigration like Obama might so slow things down and give us a chance to recheck and improve the vetting process?
    But you didnt say any of those things, you just made a personal attack with no content

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    Originally posted by 2761377
    Damn dude, I'm sorry. Normally I read all posts in thread before commenting. it's a pet peeve of mine. I have no valid reason to explain myself.

    except it's true, and needs re-iteration.
    different thread same topic

    Leave a comment:


  • Shock(/\)ave
    replied
    Maybe you guys should get out and help continue the frantic protests that have been ongoing since the election results came in. I'm sure that'll intimidate the other side into action (or inaction) like it would have for Bush (either of them)... ;D

    I am continually - and very sadly, which is indicative of the state of politics today - amazed at the fact that the agreement that contract which was created with his voters has been followed to the letter thus far.

    With these orders in place, congress could certain create new laws to reinforce them, though the Republican congress has proven willfully utterly inept at stopping the progressive/regressive agenda: they hadn't even drafted a rough framework for the replacement of the A.C.A. after 4 years, proving they had zero intent to actually repeal it. It's no wonder their voters want them driven out.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2761377
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsleeve
    I mentioned that already and it has been ignored in totality
    Damn dude, I'm sorry. Normally I read all posts in thread before commenting. it's a pet peeve of mine. I have no valid reason to explain myself.

    except it's true, and needs re-iteration.

    Leave a comment:

Working...