Let's talk about anarchy!

[decay]

I'm en route to pick up the new E30.

Will appreciate it if you give me the opportunity to read and debate rather than making assumptions- will get to it when I can but I am on a mini-vacation this weekend.

But as an initial rebuttal- I didn't see too many police/national guard/private contractors at SR without faces concealed.

[roguetoaster]

oh, well now that you've told us there's no real threat, I'll just let everyone know we can drop all operational security practices e_e

Phew, I sure was getting tired of sleeping in a chair, drinking lots of milk, carefully caring for that one houseplant, only going out to watch old movies, and doing the odd job or two for Tony.

Sure hope no corrupt DEA agents kill my neighbors but forget that they have another daughter.

[decay]

okay, I'll admit I couldn't get too far without WTFing:

Why, in a world where we know what organizations like Hamas stand for – brutality towards women, murder of gays, suppression of freedom, genocidal aspirations

ya do realize that this is pretty much a bullet-point list of our cause?

the american right demographic is also responsible for every single one of these acts.

[marshallnoise]

You are out of your gourd. Just flat out crazy for equivocating Hamas to the "American right demographic."

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

[decay]

no, I am not, you just don't understand my argument.

republicans are guilty of everything in the list I quoted from the article.

[marshallnoise]

no, I am not, you just don't understand my argument.

republicans are guilty of everything in the list I quoted from the article.

Yeah, I perfectly understand your point and I double down. Your understanding of things is warped far, far beyond reality. Sorry man, you just showed everyone here how unhinged you really are.

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

[decay]

if you say so.

[mrsleeve]

so do you think it's ethical to publish activists' personal information?

This depends, if they are publishing my information (Address, Phone numbers property records etc..) based on the fact I have a CCW, registered firearms, NFA items, or other perfectly lawful activities or endorsements that also happen to be a political hot tatter so to speak. (Publication of hand gun permit holders has been done in NY state and information attempted to be gathered in MT ( we had a thread about it )) http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/show...hlight=CCW+map

Then YES you as activist publisher should be willing to have all of your "public records " published and on display for all the world to read as well. Whats good for the goose and all that, you know.

[decay]

that's not doxxing- CCW permits are already public record. not the same thing.

[mrsleeve]

UMMMM Not in all states (in fact NOT in MOST states) , and it seems the point of the matter flew well over your head by at least a 1/4 mile yet again.

Yes that would be a more radical from of media sanctioned Doxxing how would it not be?? When a publisher searches public records and then publishes them on the internet based on ones status as a firearm owner or CCW holder with other associated personally identifiable information.

That is the fucking definition of Doxxing and based solely on owing something that the publisher does not agree with and in the hopes they would be shamed by the internet, or their neighbors, or coworkers child's teachers etc..... for their choices the publishers dont agree with..


The the publisher should expect and be willing to be put through the same public spot light.

[decay]

This is devolving into pointlessness and not really about the tenets/pros/cons of anarchism anymore.

[Hooffenstein HD]

ya do realize that this is pretty much a bullet-point list of our cause?

the american right demographic is also responsible for every single one of these acts.

Resisting the toxic gynocentrism peddled by the fascist, regressive left is in no way the same thing as what you're suggesting.

You're clearly suffering from the mental disorder of liberalism, the red pill can help with that.

[mrsleeve]

This is devolving into pointlessness and not really about the tenets/pros/cons of anarchism anymore.

You brought it up and brought Doxxing into this, and I called you on it and with a real documented case of it on a mass scale form a "legitimate" news source to back up my point.

Honestly I dont see how what you espouse aligns really well with anarchy in the true sense of the term. Seems like a "movement" with out actual identity too me

[coldweatherblue]

Pros and Cons of Anarchism:

Pro: If you're a violent criminal you will be able to take property by force with impunity.

Con: If you are a peaceful, productive citizen you are likely to be murdered and/or lose your property/possessions.

Pro: I would not pay medicare tax.

Con: With no medicare/medicaid and no access to Emergency Services due to lack of EMTALA, millions of people would die/suffer due to preventable medical illness.

Pro: I would not pay income tax.

Con: Without national defense the country would soon be taken over by a tyrannical dictator.

Pro: No speed limits, drive as fast as you want.

Con: Within a few years all roads and infrastructure would be failing and interstate travel would become impossible.

Pro: Maybe one or two people would feel less oppressed.

Con: In a lawless society, the strong will survive. Those with power, predominately strong males with the income necessary to preserve power will crush those who oppose them without fear of legal retribution, in essence creating a warring city-state society for years until power is consolidated by a single, likely male leader who wields absolute power.

Pro: Don't have to pay for WIC/women's services resulting in less taxes.

Con: Women and infants die.

[marshallnoise]

Nailed it.

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk