Let's talk about anarchy!

[mrsleeve]

UMMMM Not in all states (in fact NOT in MOST states) , and it seems the point of the matter flew well over your head by at least a 1/4 mile yet again.

Yes that would be a more radical from of media sanctioned Doxxing how would it not be?? When a publisher searches public records and then publishes them on the internet based on ones status as a firearm owner or CCW holder with other associated personally identifiable information.

That is the fucking definition of Doxxing and based solely on owing something that the publisher does not agree with and in the hopes they would be shamed by the internet, or their neighbors, or coworkers child's teachers etc..... for their choices the publishers dont agree with..


The the publisher should expect and be willing to be put through the same public spot light.

[decay]

that's not doxxing- CCW permits are already public record. not the same thing.

[mrsleeve]

so do you think it's ethical to publish activists' personal information?

This depends, if they are publishing my information (Address, Phone numbers property records etc..) based on the fact I have a CCW, registered firearms, NFA items, or other perfectly lawful activities or endorsements that also happen to be a political hot tatter so to speak. (Publication of hand gun permit holders has been done in NY state and information attempted to be gathered in MT ( we had a thread about it )) http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/show...hlight=CCW+map

Then YES you as activist publisher should be willing to have all of your "public records " published and on display for all the world to read as well. Whats good for the goose and all that, you know.

[decay]

if you say so.

[marshallnoise]

no, I am not, you just don't understand my argument.

republicans are guilty of everything in the list I quoted from the article.

Yeah, I perfectly understand your point and I double down. Your understanding of things is warped far, far beyond reality. Sorry man, you just showed everyone here how unhinged you really are.

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

[decay]

no, I am not, you just don't understand my argument.

republicans are guilty of everything in the list I quoted from the article.

[marshallnoise]

You are out of your gourd. Just flat out crazy for equivocating Hamas to the "American right demographic."

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

[decay]

okay, I'll admit I couldn't get too far without WTFing:

Why, in a world where we know what organizations like Hamas stand for – brutality towards women, murder of gays, suppression of freedom, genocidal aspirations

ya do realize that this is pretty much a bullet-point list of our cause?

the american right demographic is also responsible for every single one of these acts.

[roguetoaster]

oh, well now that you've told us there's no real threat, I'll just let everyone know we can drop all operational security practices e_e

Phew, I sure was getting tired of sleeping in a chair, drinking lots of milk, carefully caring for that one houseplant, only going out to watch old movies, and doing the odd job or two for Tony.

Sure hope no corrupt DEA agents kill my neighbors but forget that they have another daughter.

[decay]

I'm en route to pick up the new E30.

Will appreciate it if you give me the opportunity to read and debate rather than making assumptions- will get to it when I can but I am on a mini-vacation this weekend.

But as an initial rebuttal- I didn't see too many police/national guard/private contractors at SR without faces concealed.

[marshallnoise]

oh, well now that you've told us there's no real threat, I'll just let everyone know we can drop all operational security practices e_e

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2014/10/06/why-isis-and-hamas-wear-masks/

Not that you will read it because of the source, but its a damned good read about the types of people who hide behind masks.

[decay]

oh, well now that you've told us there's no real threat, I'll just let everyone know we can drop all operational security practices e_e

[marshallnoise]

I see the point though. The Founding Fathers argument was the perfect description. The Join, or Die slogan in my avatar is exactly the thing we are talking about here: Ben Franklin created it well before the revolutionary war because, King George was going to kill anyone who disagreed with him so you might as well join. Plus, the Founding Fathers were VERY public and vocal. Some did write anonymously in the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers. But I am sure they had reason and not some perceived risk.

[Mediumrarechicken]

I'm going bow out of this conversation, I've posted the most in this one and it kinda makes me look like a dick

[Mediumrarechicken]

...

you claim your job requires security clearance and you're asking why exposure of PII is bad?

What I mean is you arnt in for a penny in for a pound. It's not something you are all in for. You are in for the short term and when this little fad dies out you will go on your merry way.

If people really believed in it they would go full bore, haven't seen much of that.