I'm running an 89 325is with an S52 conversion. On the fronts I have 285x18 hoosier a6's. On the rear I have 315x18s. shocks are dual adjustable Konis. Any ideas on rear camber setting will be appreciated.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
suggestions on rear camber setting
Collapse
X
-
Granted I run 225/45-15's but here are my alignment specs for your reference:
Front:
3.5 Degrees camber
0 Toe
9.75 Caster
Rear:
2.5 Degrees Camber
1/8" Toe In
I run 800# rear springs and 600# front with Koni single adjustables set at full stiff in front and 2 turns off of full soft in rear (exactly middle setting between soft and hard). I also have no rear sway. Ride height is maxed out low in rear (GC coils) and 1" below max height in front.
I've had great success with this setup on the track. For autoX I'd start by suggesting some toe out in the front, and possibly going to zero toe in the rear.
Hope this is of some help.sigpicLevel Motorsport: www.levelmotorsport.com
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/levelmotorsport/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LeVelIndustries/?fref=ts
-
Around 220 at the wheels. Car weighs about 2500 lbs.sigpicLevel Motorsport: www.levelmotorsport.com
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/levelmotorsport/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LeVelIndustries/?fref=ts
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris916 View PostI also run about 4 degrees of camber up front and tire wear/temps are bang on.
Yeah, the difference between 3.5 being awesome and wanting 4 degrees is very dependent on the track. Honestly, I feel like 4 would be better for AutoX. However, one rule of thumb that always seems to pan out for me is 1 degree difference between front and rear. That seems to keep the car very balanced.sigpicLevel Motorsport: www.levelmotorsport.com
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/levelmotorsport/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LeVelIndustries/?fref=ts
Comment
-
One other thing that will affect the camber is the tire fit on the rim. If it's squeezed or stretched, that chages things. Coming from the old ITB world with narrow rims, I found
we used more negative camber than anyone else simply because the damned tire moved
around so much. Going to a wider rim reduced the need for static camber significantly.
Also, tire sidewall height affects it, too... taller seems to want more.
tnow, sometimes I just mess with people. It's more entertaining that way. george graves
Comment
-
Here is an update:
I went to from 3 degrees to 1 degree camber in the rear and feel that the car's handling is much improved. I find that I can get away with being more "ham-fisted" with the throttle. Before if I wasn't very, very careful getting back on the throttle after a corner, the car would break loose and get tail happy. The car seems to be much more forgiving now.Richard
Comment
-
Originally posted by TobyB View PostYou took camber OUT? As in, stood the tires PP?
tRichard
Comment
-
I once told people to run the front toed out and reduce the rear camber and people thought I was some crazy fool.
I have never found a lot of negative camber in the rear to be an advantage in most rwd cars with any moderate amount of power. The 1 degree rule is a good start point, but I've found suspension setup and tyre choice makes a huge difference and you can pretty well throw that rule out the window a lot of the time.
A lot of the E30's I've seen are run way too stiff (the rear in particular). If you turn up with 700+lb springs, rock hard dampers and the biggest bar you can find, im not really surprised it's a little twitchy and unsettled over bumps. If you take a temp probe and have a look at their tyres when they come in, you can really see where it's riding. Bit strange when you have all that rubber to help with grip levels and you only spend the majority of the time on 1/3rd of it.Just a little project im working on
- http://www.lse30.com -
Comment
-
Originally posted by Madhatter View PostI once told people to run the front toed out and reduce the rear camber and people thought I was some crazy fool.
I have never found a lot of negative camber in the rear to be an advantage in most rwd cars with any moderate amount of power. The 1 degree rule is a good start point, but I've found suspension setup and tyre choice makes a huge difference and you can pretty well throw that rule out the window a lot of the time.
A lot of the E30's I've seen are run way too stiff (the rear in particular). If you turn up with 700+lb springs, rock hard dampers and the biggest bar you can find, im not really surprised it's a little twitchy and unsettled over bumps. If you take a temp probe and have a look at their tyres when they come in, you can really see where it's riding. Bit strange when you have all that rubber to help with grip levels and you only spend the majority of the time on 1/3rd of it.
I haven't been able to tell whether I have to hold less speed in the sweepers. It seems pretty much the same, but my shifts to second gear seem to unsettle the chassis less than they used to. I used to have to be careful about shifting while turning, but it's less of a problem now.
I'm running 800 lb springs in the rear, but shock settings are full soft. The rear sway bar is not excessively large and I've toyed with unhooking it completely. Right now I have it on the weakest setting.
The car in my signature is not the car I am running now. The current car sits quite a bit lower because I have trimmed the fender flares off both front and rear. This car is converted to 5 lug and running ten and a half inch wide 18 inch corvette speedlines. The tires are currently 315s in the rear and 295s in the front. I just bought a new set of Hoosier A6s that are 275/30R17s front and rear. I'm looking forward to see how they run.Richard
Comment
Comment