E30 Non M Racer pic post

[r0ckrat]

Borrowed from the CCA PNW VBB:

[Lance Racing]

Mike Olson, Seattle:

[Lance Racing]

Bill Spornitz, Seattle:

[Lance Racing]

Jeff Van Lierop, Seattle:

[steveracer2006]

You'll see those slick little trailers all over europe. Remember, they have to tow their cars through those tiny narrow streets.

Small and light, it's not just for race cars!

Steve S.
Seattle, WA USA
Pro3 being built

[bimmer8604]

Here is our KP car (being reworked for another class) followed by the Spec E30 car we built and sold. This was at Buttonwillow last month.

would one of those happen to be my old car? how did it turn out?

Kyle

[bimmer8604]

There's also this one that belong to Paul Knese and who resides around St-Louis. I know this guy as he buys parts, doesn't pay and gives excuses. He still owes me $75usd for 2 years. Be carefull if you deal with him. He may tell you he has been busy moving, or has too much work. Can I call him a crook?

that pic was taken at MAM in Iowa, i dont know the guy, but he sure as hell ripped off that front spoiler when he went-off and drug the damn thing 10 laps or so till the end.

Here's a few pictures of my boss's ITS car. I think hes going to maybe do spec-e30 in the near future, but not sure.




and all the happy e30's at the auto-x(not racing, but its nice when a group comes out)

[rob_e30]

would one of those happen to be my old car? how did it turn out?

Kyle

Yes, it turned out great. I sold it as a Spec E30 Candidate to a guy in NJ. Here are some other pics...

[Lof8]

Screw the touring , check out that crazy assed little trailer . :crazy:

Hell look at those tiny tires and the damn thing does not even have sides . :D


Oh yeah and those M5 wheels are sex .

Is this just an early car with euro bumps? looks like high arches and small rear valence. I think I now need some euro bumpers. Car is sick.

[PiercedE30]

nope, it's definitely a late model because the rear arches don't go up to the seam in the rear quarter while the front does. The rear valence looks like it has had the black paint taken off of it just like the rocker panels.

[Rocla]

nope, it's definitely a late model because the rear arches don't go up to the seam in the rear quarter while the front does. The rear valence looks like it has had the black paint taken off of it just like the rocker panels.

Confusing, rear valace is definently early one, as are the lights, and original seams are visible beneath the lights.

Rear arches however look like later ones, but it might be that all arches have been modified, front ones look fatter than usual.

[Il Duce]

nope, it's definitely a late model because the rear arches don't go up to the seam in the rear quarter while the front does. The rear valence looks like it has had the black paint taken off of it just like the rocker panels.

wrong. it's an early model because of the tail lights. it's got a really, really, really sick s14 in there.

[Jand3rson]

nope, it's definitely a late model because the rear arches don't go up to the seam in the rear quarter while the front does. The rear valence looks like it has had the black paint taken off of it just like the rocker panels.

Ummmm, no.

It's an early model, look at the taillights and the rear apron (or lack thereof). The late-model rear apron comes down about 3-4 inches lower than that, and almost completely obscures the spare tire well, as well as the exhaust.

[PiercedE30]

well shit........i stand corrected
it must be the angle that the car is sitting because that rear valence looks lower than it really is..........

[alex]

Screw the touring , check out that crazy assed little trailer . :crazy:

Hell look at those tiny tires and the damn thing does not even have sides . :D


Oh yeah and those M5 wheels are sex .

Hey, what happened to that picture? Anybody got a copy?