Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ideal ride height?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ideal ride height?

    Wondering if anyone has done any testing as to how low you can go on the e30 front and rear suspension without adversely affecting suspension geometry. And also if there are any off-the-shelf options for adjusting bump steer.

    It seems the best way to measure would be fender lip to center of wheel, since some of us are running under or oversized tires.
    '91 318is
    sigpic

    #2
    I always measured from the trim edge as its level across the car. Some of us are crazy and completely chop fenders out
    SM 19 - Serial Destroyer of Cars
    Turbo '89 325i - It lives! Now the question is for how long?
    2SlowRcing.com

    Comment


      #3
      I wonder just how much can be done with just pulling the fenders out? I gotta try it.
      Mtech1 v8 build thread - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho...d.php?t=413205



      OEM v8 manual chip or dme - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho....php?p=4938827

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by rsafier View Post
        I always measured from the trim edge as its level across the car. Some of us are crazy and completely chop fenders out
        Thats fine for your own measurements with similar height tires, but if we're talking about suspension geometry, measuring to the wheel center will allow you to compare suspension settings regardless of overall tire diameter.
        '91 318is
        sigpic

        Comment


          #5
          True, but I was more pointing out ones fenders are not necessarily a static feature on the car. I suppose inner fender well might be...
          SM 19 - Serial Destroyer of Cars
          Turbo '89 325i - It lives! Now the question is for how long?
          2SlowRcing.com

          Comment


            #6
            I have set the front height so that the LCA's are parallel to the ground and set the rear so that I have a reasonable amount of camber.

            Does ride height in the rear ever have a major affect on suspension geometry? And if so, in what way?

            Comment


              #7
              True, but I was more pointing out ones fenders are not necessarily a static feature on the car. I suppose inner fender well might be...
              Ok, I see what you're saying now. I do think for most of us the fender lip is the way to go.

              Originally posted by mazur View Post
              I have set the front height so that the LCA's are parallel to the ground and set the rear so that I have a reasonable amount of camber.

              Does ride height in the rear ever have a major affect on suspension geometry? And if so, in what way?
              Disregarding alignment settings, the rear suspension is really limited only by suspension travel, as the camber change during suspension movement is linear and the toe change is fairly minimal. At least thats what I got out of the article on www.e30m3performance.com

              The front is a lot more complicated, and thats mostly what I'm curious about.
              Last edited by Brew; 06-04-2008, 07:10 PM.
              '91 318is
              sigpic

              Comment


                #8
                h&r sports have a nice drop but for a track car you might want something stiff like H&R racing or Eibach Ground Control.
                Benji



                '90 M50 + M3 Tranny e30 - SOLD
                '99 528iT (M5 Rep bumper) - SOLD
                '03 ML350 - For Sale

                BIMMERLESS at the moment. :???:

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by RedStar240 View Post
                  h&r sports have a nice drop but for a track car you might want something stiff like H&R racing or Eibach Ground Control.

                  who said anything abour H&R sports drop
                  Mtech1 v8 build thread - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho...d.php?t=413205



                  OEM v8 manual chip or dme - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho....php?p=4938827

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I've always heard that once your control arms go past parallel (to the ground, at static ride height) your just doing more harm than good.
                    Which isn't very low, my car would need to probably come up a full inch or maybe more.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by mazur View Post
                      I have set the front height so that the LCA's are parallel to the ground and set the rear so that I have a reasonable amount of camber.

                      Does ride height in the rear ever have a major affect on suspension geometry? And if so, in what way?
                      My understanding is that setting your control arms to parallel while the car is static will lead to a positive camber curve, when applicable side of the car is under compression, as it would go past parallel ?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        It's not really possible to make that generalization, ideal ride height at one spring rate is different from another.

                        A brief explanation.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by SA E30 View Post
                          My understanding is that setting your control arms to parallel while the car is static will lead to a positive camber curve, when applicable side of the car is under compression, as it would go past parallel ?
                          I don't think that's quite true - the angle between the control arm and the strut would have to be less than 90 degrees before you started hitting the positive camber curve. it's not neccesarily the relationship between the control arm and the ground that matters in that respect.
                          Build thread

                          Bimmerlabs

                          Comment


                            #14
                            There are way too many variables to setting the LCA at static for "the best performance". Accelerating, braking, what springs and shocks you are using, turning, off camber turn the surface and more make it next to impossible to have a perfect angle for the best performance.
                            The main thing is to go as low as you can without sacrificing suspension travel. That usually is the best setting because with most cars you can only lower the car so far anyways.
                            Even on my Integra (double wishbone) I can only lower the car about 2" before I start riding the bumpstops and I'm on 450lbs springs up front. The lower LCA at that point is sitting almost perfectly at 90*.
                            Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

                            "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

                            ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Excellent points.
                              SM 19 - Serial Destroyer of Cars
                              Turbo '89 325i - It lives! Now the question is for how long?
                              2SlowRcing.com

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X