Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NOR-CAL General Chat.

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    just to clear it up you youngsters
    Theory = a system of ideas intended to explain something. so yes it is a theory even though it is proven, as you can see it's very vague, it means too many things at once.
    "I wanna see da boat movie"
    "I got a tree on my house"

    Comment


      Originally posted by YosemiteSam View Post
      Sears Point
      idk what org is putting it on, usually they will have helmets to loan out at the event

      i have a shitty old hand me down beat up helmet you can use if there are no loaners and you want to pick it up. i'm in mountain view
      paint sucks

      Comment


        Originally posted by Thizzelle View Post
        just to clear it up you youngsters
        Theory = a system of ideas intended to explain something. so yes it is a theory even though it is proven, as you can see it's very vague, it means too many things at once.
        I have a theory that you are a douche
        paint sucks

        Comment


          Originally posted by mbonanni View Post
          Wouldn't the pivot point of the rear trailing arms and the force applied by the weight of the car, plus resistance of the spring bring both torque and torsion into play here?

          Touche, makes sense about the law, not a theory.
          If you were modeling suspension articulation under load, yes.

          Motion ratio does not depend on springs, it is measured with the springs removed and car in the air. You measure the distance between the spring perches when the wheel is more or less where it is when the car is on the ground (i.e., use a jack to simulate ride height). Then move the jack up or down a small amount of measured distance, then measure the change in distance between the spring perches. Divide distance change in spring perch by distance changed at hub, and you have your motion ratio.

          Springs and dampers and all determine how much the suspension will articulate with a vertical disturbance. They don't change the motion ratio, or the motion ratio curve (e30 rear suspension being special and all).
          2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
          95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
          98 M3/4/5 (stock)

          Comment


            Originally posted by PorscheH6 View Post
            Not sure...so many to choose from...
            Why Rs vs street tires? For the M5?

            Originally posted by YosemiteSam View Post
            Sears Point
            Which group are you going with?
            2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
            95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
            98 M3/4/5 (stock)

            Comment


              Originally posted by Bimmerman325i View Post
              If you were modeling suspension articulation under load, yes.

              Motion ratio does not depend on springs, it is measured with the springs removed and car in the air. You measure the distance between the spring perches when the wheel is more or less where it is when the car is on the ground (i.e., use a jack to simulate ride height). Then move the jack up or down a small amount of measured distance, then measure the change in distance between the spring perches. Divide distance change in spring perch by distance changed at hub, and you have your motion ratio.

              Springs and dampers and all determine how much the suspension will articulate with a vertical disturbance. They don't change the motion ratio, or the motion ratio curve (e30 rear suspension being special and all).
              I'm not going to argue anymore because my knowledge is limited to one year of AP Physics in high school..

              Buuutt I would say motion ratio does depend on the spring, when under load... To my understanding we were talking about when the car is under load, hence why spring rates, camber, etc where also taken into play.



              Wh33lhop has me crackin up.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Wh33lhop View Post
                idk what org is putting it on, usually they will have helmets to loan out at the event

                i have a shitty old hand me down beat up helmet you can use if there are no loaners and you want to pick it up. i'm in mountain view
                It's with Trackmasters. BlackbirdM3 told me about it. I asked him and he told me I'd need to source one. I'd appreciate it a lot, thanks for offering. On the website the organizer says that helmets need to be SA2005 certified. I just want to make sure that the helmet is certified to that so I'm not SOL on Saturday.
                sigpic

                Comment


                  Originally posted by mbonanni View Post
                  I'm not going to argue anymore because my knowledge is limited to one year of AP Physics in high school..

                  Buuutt I would say motion ratio does depend on the spring, when under load... To my understanding we were talking about when the car is under load, hence why spring rates, camber, etc where also taken into play.
                  Basically you two are kind of getting caught up in technicalities

                  What he is saying is that you MEASURE motion ratio based upon geometry (in this case, leverage) which torque can be closely related to, and the spring DOES put a torque on the control arm... but you don't measure motion ratios using any sort of torque or force. Just a ratio of distance displaced. So it is just geometry.

                  That said, when you do actually have a spring in there, it does put a torque on the trailing arm, and that can help you understand why it is less effective.
                  paint sucks

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by YosemiteSam View Post
                    It's with Trackmasters. BlackbirdM3 told me about it. I asked him and he told me I'd need to source one. I'd appreciate it a lot, thanks for offering. On the website the organizer says that helmets need to be SA2005 certified. I just want to make sure that the helmet is certified to that so I'm not SOL on Saturday.
                    I use it for autox. It's an SA, and IIRC it's still valid so that means it's '05 but I will double check when I get home.

                    Let me know when you want to pick it up. I'll be around Palo Alto/Mountain View most of the week.
                    paint sucks

                    Comment


                      I was never talking about motion ratios, which is where I think we both got off track..

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Bimmerman325i View Post
                        Why Rs vs street tires? For the M5?
                        Not for DD, just for auto-x and track use. Not a lot of choice w/ stock staggered sizes though, might have to go w/ a square setup.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by mbonanni View Post
                          I'm not going to argue anymore because my knowledge is limited to one year of AP Physics in high school..

                          Buuutt I would say motion ratio does depend on the spring, when under load... To my understanding we were talking about when the car is under load, hence why spring rates, camber, etc where also taken into play.



                          Wh33lhop has me crackin up.
                          No, motion ratio under load will be the same. All the motion ratio is is the proportion between wheel movement and spring perch movement as a result of a constrained linkage. Adding springs and shocks in does not change the motion ratio, as that is a function of how the trailing arm (e30 case) moves on its own. The trailing arm sweeps the same path regardless of if it has a spring or not, and it is this path that defines the motion ratio.

                          Think about it. The rear trailing arm is located by four points: the inner/outer subframe mounts, the lower shock bolt, and the upper shock bolt. The trailing arm therefore has a very rigidly defined path that it can move through. At every point along this path you can define the motion ratio as I've done so above, and it will never change regardless of what spring rate you choose. Springs will just require more force before movement occurs. Does that make sense?
                          2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
                          95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
                          98 M3/4/5 (stock)

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by PorscheH6 View Post
                            Not for DD, just for auto-x and track use. Not a lot of choice w/ stock staggered sizes though, might have to go w/ a square setup.
                            It's hip to be square

                            unless you like understeer
                            paint sucks

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Wh33lhop View Post
                              I use it for autox. It's an SA, and IIRC it's still valid so that means it's '05 but I will double check when I get home.

                              Let me know when you want to pick it up. I'll be around Palo Alto/Mountain View most of the week.
                              Cool, thanks. I'll PM you so we can work out when I can pick it up.
                              sigpic

                              Comment


                                Understeer is where it's at. Makes all the girlies scream.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X