NOR-CAL General Chat.
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
I use HD's with my IE3's. They're fine but I need something with a little more dampening. Was thinking Koni adjustables or I can get the mustang konis.Comment
-
Goodmorning folks! Been thinking of selling the e90 and getting a boss ass e38 :)
Last edited by ohthejosh; 06-01-2012, 05:35 AM.Comment
-
Shutup
EDIT: I'm out of control.Last edited by craiggroves91; 06-01-2012, 09:04 AM.Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.
1989 BMW 325i SOLD
1998 BMW Estoril Blue e36 M3/4/5 SOLD
1987 BMW 325 (The Piece) SOLD
1991 BMW 318is S52 swap (The Beast) Now Driving Project Thread: http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=234207Comment
-
Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.
1989 BMW 325i SOLD
1998 BMW Estoril Blue e36 M3/4/5 SOLD
1987 BMW 325 (The Piece) SOLD
1991 BMW 318is S52 swap (The Beast) Now Driving Project Thread: http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=234207Comment
-
^ get the z3 or 1995 M3 rack. all else suck.
off topic; Did Luke ever get back to you regarding the sub box? It seems he's vanished...hopefully humping the saw!Comment
-
Common misconception for the 1995 M3 rack.. It's actually the worst one out there.
Secondly, the '95 M3 rack is SLOWER in the center of the rack and has LESS overall travel than the regular E36 rack. This is mainly because of the different steering geometry of the '95 M3, as you recall they have a different spindle/control arm/CAB setup than the rest of E36 cars. Yes, it's 3 turns flat lock-to-lock but it's still progressive, and the overall degree-to-travel ratio is slower as there is less overall travel. Basically, on any given chassis this rack is inferior to the regular E36 rack despite the lower lock-to-lock number. I know you've read otherwise on E30 sites, and I have too. But, say it with me: screw the '95 M3 rack.
Cliffs: Z3 rack > regular E36 rack > '95 M3 rack. Do it.
I say go Z3 or don't even change it at all. All e36 racks suck because they are progressive, and that leads to a mushy steering feel always. Even then, not all Z3 racks have a 2.7 L2L. They are all linear, but the Z3 1.8 and 2.4 had a 3.2 L2L (identical to the e36 m3, but it didnt suck), and Z3 2.8s had the 2.7 L2L linear pull racks. Go Z3 or go home.Comment
-
Common misconception for the 1995 M3 rack.. It's actually the worst one out there.
I say go Z3 or don't even change it at all. All e36 racks suck because they are progressive, and that leads to a mushy steering feel always. Even then, not all Z3 racks have a 2.7 L2L. They are all linear, but the Z3 1.8 and 2.4 had a 3.2 L2L (identical to the e36 m3, but it didnt suck), and Z3 2.8s had the 2.7 L2L linear pull racks. Go Z3 or go home.
(bad info was here)
other than the crappy alignment i love my 1995 M3 rack.
idk luke fell off the face of the earth. I'll call him tomorrow.Last edited by Cabriolet; 06-01-2012, 10:51 AM.Comment
-
e30m3 is 3.9 right?Comment
Comment