NOR-CAL General Chat.
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Actually, the rear is typically much less rate at the wheel than the front with basically all setups ever done on an e30. The motion ratio is ~.65 making the rate at the wheel about 42% of the spring rate. In order to attain equal rates the rear would have to be more than double the front.
The rate does matter, but it's only one variable of many when it comes to handling and there is more than one way to skin a cat.
http://www.e30m3project.com/e30m3per.../eff_rate2.htm is a good read also
apparently the rear effective rate is 45% of the spring rate, but the front is 88%. That makes the effective spring rates on a 450/700 setup 396f and 315r, which makes sense given the weight distribution.
I'm curious what the actual effect on handling is. From playing with it a bunch at the track, it seems like as long as it's stiff enough to cut down on roll/pitch during weight transfer, and soft enough to not skip sideways, it's good.Comment
-
Ah, finally getting into the good stuff; I heard the trailing arm geometry causes a loss in at wheel spring rate, but I wasn't sure what the hard figures were on it. Calculating it out using that ratio then, 650# springs in the rear comes out to around 380# after the suspension ratio is applied, which means the fronts are still stiffer to combat the e30's oversteer
Kinda one of those "the more you know moments". Kinda cool knowing about it though
Now my only question is... If someone were to convert the rear into a trailing arm/strut hybrid and move the spring onto the strut (I've seen it done and there are some non-ghetto aftermarket companies that sell rear strut conversions), would I be able to run regular spring rates without having to calculate for the huge trailing-arm ratio?Comment
-
Now my only question is... If someone were to convert the rear into a trailing arm/strut hybrid and move the spring onto the strut (I've seen it done and there are some non-ghetto aftermarket companies that sell rear strut conversions), would I be able to run regular spring rates without having to calculate for the huge trailing-arm ratio?Comment
-
interesting
http://www.e30m3project.com/e30m3per.../eff_rate2.htm is a good read also
apparently the rear effective rate is 45% of the spring rate, but the front is 88%. That makes the effective spring rates on a 450/700 setup 396f and 315r, which makes sense given the weight distribution.
I'm curious what the actual effect on handling is. From playing with it a bunch at the track, it seems like as long as it's stiff enough to cut down on roll/pitch during weight transfer, and soft enough to not skip sideways, it's good.paint sucksComment
-
Now my only question is... If someone were to convert the rear into a trailing arm/strut hybrid and move the spring onto the strut (I've seen it done and there are some non-ghetto aftermarket companies that sell rear strut conversions), would I be able to run regular spring rates without having to calculate for the huge trailing-arm ratio?paint sucksComment
-
Comment
-
The e30 doesn't really follow traditional handling rules I've noticed, and different things seem to work for different people. Some remove the rear sway, some run a big one. Higher front rate seems to improve front grip, likely due to less roll-related camber loss. I think it just has mediocre geometry and that means the contact patch sometimes does funky things under extreme conditions. I would obviously agree that there's a sweet spot but given the e30 truck's weight distribution (have you guys measured it?) I would take its behavior with a grain of salt if I were to extrapolate it out to a "regular" e30.
my theory is that the wide variety in opinions about e30 suspension setups comes from the changes not actually causing much operational difference in actual handling and performance.
Top Gear ran a test a few seasons ago where they compared the stock and performancey (lower, stiffer, wider tires, bigger sways) versions of some new hot hatch, and the stock one ended up being faster.Comment
-
i know, i was saying i just enter to fast, brake late, so car tends to just go straight. FUCK BRAKES, RIGHTLast edited by Thizzelle; 12-11-2013, 03:07 PM."I wanna see da boat movie"
"I got a tree on my house"Comment
-
We are not quite sure of the situation yet. I think I might wind up taking my stock subframe over to press out the bushings and then just slap it in, but I still don't have my stock trailing arm bolts which is a problem. Don't have any spares, do you?paint sucksComment
-
Comment
Comment