W-w-w-w-w-WINGS every Thursday at 7:30pm?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roland H
    R3V Elite
    • Mar 2009
    • 4480

    #121
    Originally posted by Bimmerman325i
    Ill prolly be there
    Don't sound so excited!

    Comment

    • Bimmerman325i
      R3V OG
      • Dec 2007
      • 6854

      #122
      K, revised: unless I'm dealing with shipping ASTs back for a refund, I should be there.
      2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
      95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
      98 M3/4/5 (stock)

      Comment

      • blefevre
        R3V Elite
        • Dec 2008
        • 4287

        #123
        Disappoint

        - E30, DSM, Golf R, Mazda 3 Skyactiv

        Comment

        • Bimmerman325i
          R3V OG
          • Dec 2007
          • 6854

          #124
          Originally posted by blefevre
          Disappoint
          Issues, they haz. Sick of it, I am. Disappoint, son I am very.
          2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
          95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
          98 M3/4/5 (stock)

          Comment

          • Roland H
            R3V Elite
            • Mar 2009
            • 4480

            #125
            If you're having shock problems I feel bad for you son... I got 99 problems, but a damper aint one!

            Comment

            • Bimmerman325i
              R3V OG
              • Dec 2007
              • 6854

              #126
              Originally posted by Roland H
              If you're having shock problems I feel bad for you son... I got 99 problems, but a damper aint one!
              lulz.

              According to Vorshlag I can't even return them for a refund since they're "used." Think about that though, how the hell would I know they didn't work just by looking at them? 30 miles is barely used at all. They're going to see if AST will buy them back, but I'm not holding my breath. Color me very unimpressed.

              Expensive useless fucking paperweights.
              2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
              95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
              98 M3/4/5 (stock)

              Comment

              • Roland H
                R3V Elite
                • Mar 2009
                • 4480

                #127
                Originally posted by Bimmerman325i
                Expensive useless fucking paperweights.
                Agreed. Subaru should have stuck to making airplanes.

                Comment

                • Bimmerman325i
                  R3V OG
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 6854

                  #128
                  Originally posted by Roland H
                  Agreed. Subaru should have stuck to making airplanes.
                  A wild airplane comment appears!
                  2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
                  95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
                  98 M3/4/5 (stock)

                  Comment

                  • Roland H
                    R3V Elite
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 4480

                    #129
                    Originally posted by Bimmerman325i
                    A wild airplane comment appears!
                    I've had thoughts about taking an EJ22 and stuffing it into some kind of light aircraft. Theoretically it would work with minor modifications.... longevity and reliability would be an interesting story though.

                    Comment

                    • Bimmerman325i
                      R3V OG
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 6854

                      #130
                      Originally posted by Roland H
                      I've had thoughts about taking an EJ22 and stuffing it into some kind of light aircraft. Theoretically it would work with minor modifications.... longevity and reliability would be an interesting story though.
                      Lots of guys do the EG33 (H6, basically a six cyl EJ22) for airplanes.

                      The EJ22 has no longevity and reliability issues. EJ25, different story, but you can't kill an EJ22.
                      2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
                      95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
                      98 M3/4/5 (stock)

                      Comment

                      • Roland H
                        R3V Elite
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 4480

                        #131
                        Originally posted by Bimmerman325i
                        Lots of guys do the EG33 (H6, basically a six cyl EJ22) for airplanes.

                        The EJ22 has no longevity and reliability issues. EJ25, different story, but you can't kill an EJ22.
                        I'd rather do a turbo 4 than an H6 for an airplane. But yeah, that thought had crossed my mind too.

                        Longevity and reliability issues in an airplane are much different than a car. Think about running your car at whatever RPM makes the most HP (usually pretty high) for all of it's life, with many 4-6 hour stints if not longer... that's a lot of wear and tear (and why engine life is calculated in hours, not miles). Also, getting oil to the critical components of the engine during different phases of flight isn't so simple for a car engine designed to be driven on flat-ish land (no 30~45 degree bank turns, etc).

                        Comment

                        • Bimmerman325i
                          R3V OG
                          • Dec 2007
                          • 6854

                          #132
                          Originally posted by Roland H
                          I'd rather do a turbo 4 than an H6 for an airplane. But yeah, that thought had crossed my mind too.

                          Longevity and reliability issues in an airplane are much different than a car. Think about running your car at whatever RPM makes the most HP (usually pretty high) for all of it's life, with many 4-6 hour stints if not longer... that's a lot of wear and tear (and why engine life is calculated in hours, not miles). Also, getting oil to the critical components of the engine during different phases of flight isn't so simple for a car engine designed to be driven on flat-ish land (no 30~45 degree bank turns, etc).
                          Right, and there's a reason that the EG33 or EJ22 are used for airplanes pretty frequently.

                          Not disagreeing, just saying, if I can't kill an EJ22 by redlining it for years, it won't die in an airplane. It is not a stressed motor. For the turbo one...ask Preston/AJ/Brendan/Diego or better yet Kellie, I haven't researched it enough to make any judgement.
                          2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
                          95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
                          98 M3/4/5 (stock)

                          Comment

                          • flying_violin
                            Grease Monkey
                            • Jan 2011
                            • 325

                            #133
                            If you are banked 30-45 degrees in an airplane, the local acceleration is still straight down through the floor if the pilot does it right, as Bob Hoover demonstrated:


                            At any rate, it is a lot harder to pull over to the side of the road in an airplane and poke around under the hood!

                            Alpine II 318is

                            Comment

                            • clarkkey594
                              E30 Mastermind
                              • Feb 2010
                              • 1724

                              #134
                              So I might be at this outing on Thursday depending on how much I feel like studying for my final on Friday.
                              89 325i (Sold)
                              95 M3 (Track Car in Progress)
                              2001 4runner (DD)

                              Comment

                              • Roland H
                                R3V Elite
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 4480

                                #135
                                Originally posted by flying_violin
                                If you are banked 30-45 degrees in an airplane, the local acceleration is still straight down through the floor if the pilot does it right, as Bob Hoover demonstrated:


                                At any rate, it is a lot harder to pull over to the side of the road in an airplane and poke around under the hood!
                                Depends on whether you are turning, or just banked... But yeah, not something you can really tinker around with until you get it right.

                                Originally posted by clarkkey594
                                So I might be at this outing on Thursday depending on how much I feel like studying for my final on Friday.
                                Study? UMAD.jpg

                                Comment

                                Working...