Definitely what I assumed... Lower and slower revving does a lot of help to bearings and rings in the long run.
Could also be the fact that the etas weren't driven as sports car until fairly recently, and probably serviced/treated better throughout the life span. In my experience, etas have less cylinder leakage as they age.
Probably the reason why you see more b27s with over 350k
M20 engine build
Collapse
X
-
-
-
if you wanna trade that M50 for my dissambled M20B27 short block, I'm game.
:DLeave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
-
Having actually owned and driven a 2.5i, 2.7e, and 2.7i, I will say that the 2.7i is better hands down.
I do not understand all the workbench engineers who love to chime into every 2.7i discussion to slam it. Is it a hp monster? Of course not. Is it better than a 2.7e? Absolutely. Is it the best hp/$ investment you can make in an eta? You betcha.
Throw a cam at it, and you have a strong na engine for very little money invested.
My point is, try not to get wrapped up in chasing what engine option looks best on paper. There are too many variables, and there is always a 'better option' for every upgrade, if only you're willing to spend a few dollars more.
A 2.7i can be done with no special tools in a weekend in your driveway. It will breathe new life into a low revving eta. It will put a smile on your face when you drive it.Last edited by Andy.B; 11-25-2014, 02:46 PM.Leave a comment:
-
If you are interested in a boosted m20b27 I am putting mine up for sale once it gets a new cylinder head or resurface
Leave a comment:
-
-
Leave a comment: