Finally, some dyno numbers

[Mr Two]

These were taken on a Dynocom dyno. Supposed to read somewhere in between dynojet and mustang dynos.

CF was 1.01 for the last run, 44.1 degrees, 67% humidity, 28.19 in-Hg

Crappy pictures!




I'll scan it when I'm not lazy. I should have the file itself next week.

[Mr Two]

Also I have videos.

Also it might have fuel cut early due to the speed sensor being on the fritz (the clips holding it to the diff are broken, so it doesn't stay tight when the rear end squats under hard acceleration).

Also I have some minor exhaust leaks and still have yet to get an x pipe fabbed up.

Wooo!

[Wh33lhop]

AAH! OH MY GOD!!

;)

What's done to the S52 in question?

[Mr Two]

:D

Raceland euro SS longtube reps, dual 2.5" piping into a UUC System U, M50 manifold, 3.5" HFM, 3.5" shielded CAI, 3.5" -> 3" silicone intake boot, TRM chip, 12lb euro 323i flywheel.

[E30Idea]

Are you Corey Zusin????

[Mr Two]

Yep, lol

[ZM Blue Devil]

damn, thats nice.

[Mr Two]

According to the owner of the dyno, it usually reads about 8% lower than a dynojet

[Mr Two]

Also, a stock e46 M3 put down 258whp an hour later on the same dyno. wtf!

[sharksforthecup]

247 whp w/ stock cams? Damn:p

[aeryk7]

So how did you go up 10 rwhp from run to run

[e30s52]

Wow, great numbers

[lennon]

yeah OP what did you change between runs?

[JGood]

Looks like they cut the run short at 5650 RPM's, which makes the peak number lower since the s52 makes peak power above that RPM.

Yet another reason that looking at peak Dyno numbers is useless...

[jahnaboi]

Haven't seen that program before. Nice numbers nonetheless.