Finally, some dyno numbers

[markseven]

haven't seen that program before. Nice numbers nonetheless.

+1

[z31maniac]

I'd say those numbers are a bit optimistic, but it looks like the TQ is smooth which is what matters.

Not really sure about your A/Fs since I don't really understand their plotting system. Seems overly complicated for no reason.

[Wh33lhop]

Raceland euro SS longtube reps, dual 2.5" piping into a UUC System U, M50 manifold, 3.5" HFM, 3.5" shielded CAI, 3.5" -> 3" silicone intake boot, TRM chip, 12lb euro 323i flywheel.

Stock cams? Great numbers.

Not really sure about your A/Fs since I don't really understand their plotting system. Seems overly complicated for no reason.

Seriously! Unless the AFR is 16:1 between 4 and 5.5k and 10:1 everywhere else...

[Mr Two]

He cut off early in the first plot, but the 2nd and third runs he took it to redline, just their software does not always display correctly. I think the AFRs got thrown off by all the condensation I was spitting out the first run.

[e30polak]

I'd say those numbers are a bit optimistic, but it looks like the TQ is smooth which is what matters.

Not really sure about your A/Fs since I don't really understand their plotting system. Seems overly complicated for no reason.

This. Those number are quite high for a non-cammed s52. Dyno probably reads 8% higher, not lower then usual.

Great numbers nonetheless. I know those Racelands flow quite a bit better then the Ebay SS knock-offs.

[Mr Two]

It's not reading high, though. If it is, it was only on my car.

The e46 M3 made 258whp. A Boxster S with what sounded like at least an exhaust made 243. My friend's Saleen F150, which made 310 on a Dynojet, made 289 on this and that's after an exhaust This was all within one or two hours.

[e30polak]

It's not reading high, though. If it is, it was only on my car.

The e46 M3 made 258whp. A Boxster S with what sounded like at least an exhaust made 243. My friend's Saleen F150, which made 310 on a Dynojet, made 289 on this and that's after an exhaust This was all within one or two hours.

If that's the case, then you have one of those freak s52s. Those numbers are way above average for you mods. :-|

The numbers also explain your run in with that e92 M3.

[C-T]

Mr Two, I can't see it on the sheet you posted, and I'm curious - Are those numbers SAE corrected?

edit -

CF was 1.01 for the last run, 44.1 degrees, 67% humidity, 28.19 in-Hg

Sorry for not reading closer, I will assume the answer is no.

[Wh33lhop]

Mr Two, I can't see it on the sheet you posted, and I'm curious - Are those numbers SAE corrected?

edit -



Sorry for not reading closer, I will assume the answer is no.

Even so, using that correction factor the difference between the two numbers would be 2.4hp.

[C-T]

Even so, using that correction factor the difference between the two numbers would be 2.4hp.

Nice!

[Skafrog]

IIRC that car has some cam work. It's been a few years though. Ask Herb.

[Mr Two]

Really? That would explain a lot - I was under the impression it had stock cams.

[Mr Two]

Just talked to Herb - he never had any cam work done

[LowR3V'in]

Most runs are sae corrected so people make
about the same numbers on the same setups, in different
places. You can see +20hp uncorrected compared to what
other people make.

Is your run sae corrected? Still must be running pretty good congrats!

[Adrian_Visser]

what chip are you running?