I may soon be able to get my hands on the engine (and trans if I need it) from a 330ci for cheap. Anyone ever done the m54 swap? Would it be worth it? Thoughts?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
m54?
Collapse
X
-
Okay... before everyone jumps on here and says "for the love of god and all that is holy, use the m***** f****** SEARCH FEATURE" I'll jump in and tell you to look at hoveringuy's thread where meticulously documents every step of his m54 swap. You can use the search feature to find it. Search "hoveringuy m54"971-295-7077
91' 318i
-
Yes, an M54 swap has been thoroughly documented by hoveringuy, and if you actually read his posts, you'd have seen that the car has been finished and driving for over a YEAR.
Is it better than an S50? Opinions are like assholes, everyone has them. For track use, hell no (M54 is much more fragile). For DD/fun? I think they'd be about even. S5x has much better power potential for the dollar though, but that might not matter. It should get better fuel economy and has more torque down low in the rpm band.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bimmerman325i View PostYes, an M54 swap has been thoroughly documented by hoveringuy, and if you actually read his posts, you'd have seen that the car has been finished and driving for over a YEAR.
Is it better than an S50? Opinions are like assholes, everyone has them. For track use, hell no (M54 is much more fragile). For DD/fun? I think they'd be about even. S5x has much better power potential for the dollar though, but that might not matter. It should get better fuel economy and has more torque down low in the rpm band.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elysian View PostWhat's so fragile about an M54 if you're not boosted to 400+ hp? If you're doing an engine swap you're going to address the oil pump nut issue when you do the oil pan swap and should probably baffle the pan to begin with, M54 also uses the same crank as the S52, and plenty use the M54 on the track with little to no issue...
Now, for a street car, that doesn't matter. Keep the rev limit stock and it will be happy forever. It is not a high rpm powerhouse like the S5x is, so as long as you respect the motor's limits, it will be fine. I would NOT choose one for an autox or track oriented car though, especially for an E30 swap. For a DD I think it would be a great motor since it is torquey down low.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nando View Posthahaha, the S50/S52 US motors are high-rpm power houses? are you high?
M54 = S52 with an 84mm bore and aluminum block. Oh, it also has double, variable vanos.
None of these motors are high rpm powerhouses either.. they're all M50 strokers with slightly upgraded cams.
My point is that US S5x motors can happily rev 700-1100 rpm higher, which yields more power than an m54 that eats itself above stock rev limit.
You can spin an M52 to 7600rpm all day long, and an S50 US to 7400/7500. Try that in an M54 and it will just die.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nando View Postwhat? really? bone stock to 7500+? what happens when your lifters bleed out and collapse? also what happens when your VE falls off a cliff at 7000rpm?
Local M52 GTS2 car is spinning to 7500rpm with AA headers/tune/intake and stock cams, making ~200whp. Bone stock internals as I recall.
Sunbelt used to sell (via bimmerworld) a kit for the S50 that would redline at 7600rpm for race use with upgraded lifters. It got pulled off the market when people tried to use the 7600rpm redline with S52s and ate motors. S50s are happy to rev that high briefly, S52s are pretty much unable to go above 7200 without major problems. Both cases with upgraded lifters.
VE is another matter entirely, there's no point on stock intake/exhaust/cams to go above 7k. My point is that you CAN go that high if you want without building the hell out of the motor. M54, not so much, just ask Vorshlag.
Comment
-
The M54 has a couple of problems compared to the S50/S52. The head doesn't flow nearly as well so while the intake in general is very good, it just can't sustain power over 6k rpm. The damper is known to slip/fail in track use. The archilles heel seems to be the oil pump input shaft which will sheer due to harmonics at sustained high rpms.
So, it's not that the S50/S52 is that much more powerful at high rpms, but much more reliable.
M54, on the other hand, has an awesome torque curve thanks to the extra VANOS range and particularly the DISA, which is fantastic. Weight is around 45-50lbs less than an iron block. Finally, aluminum is shiny and just looks cool.
And I'm coming up on 3 years of M54 service!Last edited by hoveringuy; 10-10-2011, 08:32 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bimmerman325i View PostShould have elaborated more.
Local M52 GTS2 car is spinning to 7500rpm with AA headers/tune/intake and stock cams, making ~200whp. Bone stock internals as I recall.
Sunbelt used to sell (via bimmerworld) a kit for the S50 that would redline at 7600rpm for race use with upgraded lifters. It got pulled off the market when people tried to use the 7600rpm redline with S52s and ate motors. S50s are happy to rev that high briefly, S52s are pretty much unable to go above 7200 without major problems. Both cases with upgraded lifters.
VE is another matter entirely, there's no point on stock intake/exhaust/cams to go above 7k. My point is that you CAN go that high if you want without building the hell out of the motor. M54, not so much, just ask Vorshlag.
Now if you want to cam the M54, it gets a bit more pricey, unless you just go with ZHP cams, but that's not a huge gain.
Comment
Comment