N52 intake shootout

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hoveringuy
    replied
    I'm pleased with this!

    Nice thing about the "Euro" intake is that it opens up a lot of room where the DISA stuff used to be. I designed and printed in aluminum a little holding fixture that uses the stock E90 PS reservoir and positions it down and out of sight.

    Not up on the fender strut mount anymore, no more lines running down from there, but still accessible and functional. (still waiting on the correct washers...)


    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-12-19 163647.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	155.8 KB
ID:	10152953 Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-12-19 163714.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	162.4 KB
ID:	10152954 Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-12-19 163736.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	165.9 KB
ID:	10152955 Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-12-19 163803.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	168.3 KB
ID:	10152952

    Leave a comment:


  • hoveringuy
    replied
    Originally posted by downforce22

    Why are you skeptical? Nice resaerch here.
    Because

    1- The conventional wisdom is that MILVs plus a tune nets 10hp, therefore the MILVs are good for 10hp. I haven't seen that anybody has run the same comparison with JUST the tune, or that they've un-installed the MILVs to show that the gains were lost. So, I'm inclined to think that the tune resulted in the gains.

    2- Going from 9.7mm to 10.7mm should result in more than 10hp...

    3- A technical examination shows that adding vertical from the MILV modification does not translate into more lift because of the horizontal component of motion. https://youtu.be/u4zKBsJRvYA

    4- I've examined my spare head closely and my conclusion is that MILVs change the zero point of the lifter, but since a valve can't be any more closed than closed, that total lift is unchanged.

    I think the only way to increase N52 lift would be to swap the camshaft, engineer a re-ground eccentric shaft or to change the geometry of the rocker arms.

    Leave a comment:


  • downforce22
    replied
    Originally posted by hoveringuy

    M50 also had 10.3mm of lift where the N52 is 9.7mm.

    I'm highly skeptical of MILVs adding 1mm of lift, but I think a Schrick intake cam would uncork another 10-15hps.
    Why are you skeptical? Nice resaerch here.

    Leave a comment:


  • hoveringuy
    replied
    Originally posted by Digitalwave
    Not bad. Kinda surprised it still falls off at the same spot up top.
    The shorter and larger N54 intake would do better there, but there's no free lunch.

    I think we all remember the M50 vs M52 intake comparisons, the M50 did better up top but gave up some torque, but even being 30% larger the gains were limited to a relatively narrow range. This N52 comparison has the exact same runners but removes the curvy stuff before it so probably why it's higher, has the same shape and only slightly shifted right. Kind of like with and without a restrictive filter.

    I'd love to see a comparison of the M50 runner area compared to N52, but I suspect it's smaller than M50.

    M50 also had 10.3mm of lift where the N52 is 9.7mm.

    I'm highly skeptical of MILVs adding 1mm of lift, but I think a Schrick intake cam would uncork another 10-15hps.




    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-11-14 170235.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	90.8 KB
ID:	10150913
    M52 and M50 intakes

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-11-14 170146.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	51.2 KB
ID:	10150912


    Leave a comment:


  • Digitalwave
    replied
    Not bad. Kinda surprised it still falls off at the same spot up top.

    Leave a comment:


  • hoveringuy
    replied
    It's all bullshit until the car hits the dyno...

    I dropped the car at 22RPD these last 2 weeks for a "real" tune on the hybrid intake. They basically used their off-the shelf tune for their version of the trumpet intake and tweaked a few things.

    Picked it up and the car drives great, definitely filled the mid-range in where it was a little weak and it's much punchier now.

    So took it to a Dynojet for some "real" numbers.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-11-08 150436.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	168.3 KB
ID:	10150493
    Engine as it sits. 100% stock N52 aside from S54 headers and a hybrid "euro" intake. Still has MAF and a cone filter.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DISA.png
Views:	0
Size:	43.2 KB
ID:	10150496
    This is what it did with the DISA, which wasn't bad. 243 is pretty decent.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Euro intake.png
Views:	0
Size:	44.9 KB
ID:	10150495

    Here's with the new intake. Torque is obviously slightly weaker down low,

    Click image for larger version

Name:	both.png
Views:	0
Size:	56.4 KB
ID:	10150494

    Both combined. My data from the N54 intake shows that it's pretty weak until 6000 and then it peaks a few hundred rpms past the blue line and carries a little less power higher up.

    Leave a comment:


  • DEV0 E30
    replied
    Would love to get in on an Adam Norris special intake!

    Hoping I an put some more time into making my car run instead of sitting like it has been.

    Leave a comment:


  • JRowe
    replied
    Here’s the wagon and some underhood pics. Looks like there’s room but would need to move the ps reservoir and perhaps get rid of the stock airbox.

    Leave a comment:


  • JRowe
    replied
    [QUOTE=hoveringuy;n10143817]
    Originally posted by JRowe

    Looks like the way to go as far as N52 manifolds are concerned. /QUOTE]

    For sure! I tried N54 and I wasn't impressed, this setup rips! I'd be curious to see how this fits in an E90, TB would possibly need to be tilted down or something. I think their brake reservoir sits right there.
    I have an e91. I’d like to put it in both the e30 I’ll be swapping and the wagon. I’ll take pics of the stock intake in the e90 and post them.

    Leave a comment:


  • hoveringuy
    replied
    [QUOTE=JRowe;n10143741]

    Looks like the way to go as far as N52 manifolds are concerned. /QUOTE]

    For sure! I tried N54 and I wasn't impressed, this setup rips! I'd be curious to see how this fits in an E90, TB would possibly need to be tilted down or something. I think their brake reservoir sits right there.

    Leave a comment:


  • adam.nonis
    replied
    Originally posted by JRowe

    Looks like the way to go as far as N52 manifolds are concerned. Are people sharing a 3d printing file etc? I'd love to get my hands on at least two of these. Thanks
    Happy to share the files. Just want to wait until we get a couple more out and running. There's a few versions available too.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

    Leave a comment:


  • JRowe
    replied
    Originally posted by adam.nonis

    Just the OEM flange and runners, cut off everything after the base runners and add a single chamber plenum.






    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Looks like the way to go as far as N52 manifolds are concerned. Are people sharing a 3d printing file etc? I'd love to get my hands on at least two of these. Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • adam.nonis
    replied
    Originally posted by JRowe

    So, just trying to piece together exactly what the modified DISA manifold is and how to recreate it. Can you spelll that out in a “for dummies” kinda way. Thanks.
    Just the OEM flange and runners, cut off everything after the base runners and add a single chamber plenum.






    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

    Leave a comment:


  • JRowe
    replied
    Originally posted by hoveringuy

    Similar-ish.

    The 22RPD is going to be a made-from-scratch intake with something of a plenum that will be optimized to fit E90 chassis. adam.nonis fabricated a very similar trumpet intake that I got to test on the dyno along with this modified DISA one.

    My opinion of the trumpet intake is that "the juice isn't worth the squeeze". I didn't see any substantial performance benefits on the dyno (or any?) over this modified DISA one and then the downside was that the big, gaping bellmouths needed a much larger (wider..) plenum that didn't fit nearly as well.

    This intake really fits the sweet spot of being perfectly street drivable with much usable torque while not giving up very much on the top to an N54 intake. Plus, it has OEM fit and reliability and clears the brake booster.
    So, just trying to piece together exactly what the modified DISA manifold is and how to recreate it. Can you spelll that out in a “for dummies” kinda way. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • hoveringuy
    replied
    Originally posted by Caperix
    Is this the same intake offered by 22RPD, or do the just end up looking similar?
    https://22rpd.com/blog/n52-trumpets-...rders-open-now
    Similar-ish.

    The 22RPD is going to be a made-from-scratch intake with something of a plenum that will be optimized to fit E90 chassis. adam.nonis fabricated a very similar trumpet intake that I got to test on the dyno along with this modified DISA one.

    My opinion of the trumpet intake is that "the juice isn't worth the squeeze". I didn't see any substantial performance benefits on the dyno (or any?) over this modified DISA one and then the downside was that the big, gaping bellmouths needed a much larger (wider..) plenum that didn't fit nearly as well.

    This intake really fits the sweet spot of being perfectly street drivable with much usable torque while not giving up very much on the top to an N54 intake. Plus, it has OEM fit and reliability and clears the brake booster.

    Leave a comment:

Working...