so my front struts are shot. I was just going to buy new Boge all around but the bilstein HD are the same price. Anyone run this setup? any speculation would be welcome as well.
Anyone run Bils HD with stock springs?
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
if they're the same price go for the billies. No problem with stock springs88 325 IX DiamantSchwarz - TOURING - waiting...
89 325 IX AlpinWeiß - Gone
88 325 IX DiamantSchwarz - Parted
89 325 IX RoyalBlau - Parted
88 325 IX RoyalBlau - Gone
88 325 IX DiamantSchwarz - Parted -
The Bilstein are a little better shock and I prefer the dampening profile over the OE Sachs/Boge.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
HDs are a far better design than the stock Boge.. the HDs will probably last 3 times longer too. does anyone really use stock shocks anymore?Comment
-
May I ask how the Bilstein Touring inserts compare to HDs ??Mtech1 v8 build thread - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho...d.php?t=413205
OEM v8 manual chip or dme - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho....php?p=4938827Comment
-
I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
You are supposed to match the damping of the shocks with the spring rate of the springs to obtain optimal road performance (i.e. over/under damped). You can do the calculation, but the HDs will be too stiff to give you the optimal ride for comfort and design. If you're looking for stiff with a stock ride height, then the HDs will work, but they won't be matched correctly in the least bit.Comment
-
This is partially true, however the HDs on stock springs isn't all that bad of a match (as long as you get the correct application).You are supposed to match the damping of the shocks with the spring rate of the springs to obtain optimal road performance (i.e. over/under damped). You can do the calculation, but the HDs will be too stiff to give you the optimal ride for comfort and design. If you're looking for stiff with a stock ride height, then the HDs will work, but they won't be matched correctly in the least bit.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
Zing. Exactly why I think my H&R sports aren't exactly matched with the Bilstein Sports :(You are supposed to match the damping of the shocks with the spring rate of the springs to obtain optimal road performance (i.e. over/under damped). You can do the calculation, but the HDs will be too stiff to give you the optimal ride for comfort and design. If you're looking for stiff with a stock ride height, then the HDs will work, but they won't be matched correctly in the least bit.Mtech1 v8 build thread - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho...d.php?t=413205
OEM v8 manual chip or dme - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho....php?p=4938827Comment
-
what did you think bilstein engineered these things for?You are supposed to match the damping of the shocks with the spring rate of the springs to obtain optimal road performance (i.e. over/under damped). You can do the calculation, but the HDs will be too stiff to give you the optimal ride for comfort and design. If you're looking for stiff with a stock ride height, then the HDs will work, but they won't be matched correctly in the least bit.Comment
-
I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment


Comment