Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Super Eta AFM vs 2.5 AFM??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Super Eta AFM vs 2.5 AFM??

    Is there any difference between an air flow meter for a Super Eta and a standard M20B25 AFM?
    BimmerHeads
    Classic BMW Specialists
    Santa Clarita, CA

    www.BimmerHeads.com


    #2
    You could check the part numbers on realoem.com.
    The car makes it possible, but the driver makes it happen.
    Jim Levie, Huntsville, AL

    Comment


      #3
      Yes there is a part number difference. The difference however is the electronics to suit the motronic 1.0 found on the eta's. The 325i and eta AFM are the same other wise.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by eta View Post
        Yes there is a part number difference. The difference however is the electronics to suit the motronic 1.0 found on the eta's. The 325i and eta AFM are the same other wise.
        no they aren't. the eta AFM is much smaller. also, the seta uses motronic 1.1, not motronic 1.0. the motronic 1.0 AFMs also output a different shaped curve. than 1.1/1.3 AFMs
        Build thread

        Bimmerlabs

        Comment


          #5
          Just the way its tuned

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by nando View Post
            no they aren't. the eta AFM is much smaller. also, the seta uses motronic 1.1, not motronic 1.0. the motronic 1.0 AFMs also output a different shaped curve. than 1.1/1.3 AFMs
            The SuperETA AFM is the same in shape and size as a normal "i" AFM. It's Motronic 1.1 since it's an 88. I sold mine to a guy with a 325i and he put it on right in front of me and we took the car for a test drive and it seemed normal.
            1988SuperETA|Full I component swap|19lb injectors|Schrick 272|MSIIExtraBeta20071020|GM DIS Wasted Spark|LC-1

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by E30Eric View Post
              The SuperETA AFM is the same in shape and size as a normal "i" AFM. It's Motronic 1.1 since it's an 88. I sold mine to a guy with a 325i and he put it on right in front of me and we took the car for a test drive and it seemed normal.
              I said eta not seta ;)

              I also said the seta was motronic 1.1...
              Build thread

              Bimmerlabs

              Comment


                #8
                I think he was agreeing with you

                Comment


                  #9
                  it's hard to tell lol
                  Build thread

                  Bimmerlabs

                  Comment


                    #10
                    So if I have an i head and 173 on my Super Eta motor should I get an i AFM or are they the same?
                    BimmerHeads
                    Classic BMW Specialists
                    Santa Clarita, CA

                    www.BimmerHeads.com

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by MR 325 View Post
                      So if I have an i head and 173 on my Super Eta motor should I get an i AFM or are they the same?
                      use the "i" afm, the resistance curves are different (they are the same mechanicly, tho)
                      1989 cirrisblau-metallic 325i

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Thanks fellas.
                        BimmerHeads
                        Classic BMW Specialists
                        Santa Clarita, CA

                        www.BimmerHeads.com

                        Comment


                          #13


                          Please take a look at this link. It is for a July 1988 325e. It shows compatability for the AFM with the E34 520i, 320i and late 528e's.

                          Having cmpared a 325i AFM and an Eta one the intake boot fits over both so the are phyically the same size. The flap size look similar but without measuring air flow on a bench I cannot comment.

                          Fundentally I was saying there is a difference.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X