This thread is hilarious!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
eBay M20 Light Weight Pulley / Crank Dampner
Collapse
X
-
and to think for my Chump build I was going to put the i flywheel on the e bottom end! what was I thinking???? I almost lost a bunch of torque there!
/sarcasm
O.P. - I'm curious. Did you post this because you were considering what the benefits might be? Or because you saw an aluminum trigger wheel, thought the seller might be on crack and wanted clarification if it would work with the sensors on the M20?Ben
Thelma-Louise, the '88is Chump Car - back to M20 power!
2014 ChumpCar Season Schedule!
April 5-6 Autobahn, IL - Sat: 1st! Sun: 3rd
May23-25 Watkins Glen, NY: 4th, 5th, 4th
October 4 PittRace Sprints: 2nd in C-class
October 18-19 NCM, Bowling Green KY: 2nd, 1st!
Nov 1-2 Watkins Glen - Chumpionship - 1st car to exit the race with significant body damage :(
Find us on FB! Schaut Speed Motorsports
Comment
-
Originally posted by NigelStu View PostNo.
But then again, I'm using the assumption that the air/fuel mixture burning in the cylinder, creating pressure and thus moving the pistons down is what is creating the torque on the crankshaft.
If you don't believe it, don't listen to me, keep on thinking that you can run an engine without any weight on the rotating assembly. it's the same concept. I'm not going to bother arguing anymore.'84 318i M10B18 147- Safari Beige
NA: 93whp/90ftlbs, MS2E w/ LC, 2-Step
Turbo: 221whp/214ftlbs, MS3x flex @ 17psi
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jaxx_ View PostWe're not talking about changing anything besides rotating assembly weight. It's harder to stop a box made of lead traveling at 10mph than it is to stop a box made of plastic traveling at 10mph.
If you don't believe it, don't listen to me, keep on thinking that you can run an engine without any weight on the rotating assembly. it's the same concept. I'm not going to bother arguing anymore.
Comment
-
Reducing the weight of the rotating assembly will lessen it's INERTIA, allowing the speed of the engine to rise and fall more rapidly. It does not gain you any power. Examples: lightened internals, light flywheel, lightened valvetrain, etc.
TORQUE is a force created by the exploding gases in the cylinders driving the crankshaft to turn. Torque is increased by upping the force exerted on the pistons. Examples: higher c/r, larger displacement, forced induction.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jaxx_ View Posttheoretically, it's the same, but the concept could be seen the other way -- less weight means it's easier to slow the rotating assembly. WOT up a steep hill, more weight = more torque. make sense?
F=ma. It's the same final torque, but at a constant acceleration, you have more torque.
With a constant force (force of the engine at any given rpm), a decrease in the mass, will increase acceleration. The equation is different with rotation, but the principle is the same.Originally posted by Grueliusand i do not know what bugg brakes are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KenC View PostInertia and torque are different.
Originally posted by nando View Postit's also harder to accelerate, which is what you are doing in an engine, continuously. the rotating parts are *always* accelerating, so more mass does not help it make more torque.'84 318i M10B18 147- Safari Beige
NA: 93whp/90ftlbs, MS2E w/ LC, 2-Step
Turbo: 221whp/214ftlbs, MS3x flex @ 17psi
Comment
-
Originally posted by KenC View PostYou're using that equation incorrectly. Actually I'm not sure how you're interpreting it, as the following sentences make no sense.
With a constant force (force of the engine at any given rpm), a decrease in the mass, will increase acceleration. The equation is different with rotation, but the principle is the same.'84 318i M10B18 147- Safari Beige
NA: 93whp/90ftlbs, MS2E w/ LC, 2-Step
Turbo: 221whp/214ftlbs, MS3x flex @ 17psi
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jaxx_ View PostRPMs will drop faster with a lighter motor that's at it's peak output vs a heavier motor that is at it's peak output. This is how torque is going to feel.Originally posted by Grueliusand i do not know what bugg brakes are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KenC View PostWhat will my torque curve look like with my new 100lb flywheel?
Oh, I added a 100lb crank dampener too.'84 318i M10B18 147- Safari Beige
NA: 93whp/90ftlbs, MS2E w/ LC, 2-Step
Turbo: 221whp/214ftlbs, MS3x flex @ 17psi
Comment
-
Originally posted by CorvallisBMW View PostReducing the weight of the rotating assembly will lessen it's INERTIA, allowing the speed of the engine to rise and fall more rapidly. It does not gain you any power. Examples: lightened internals, light flywheel, lightened valvetrain, etc.
TORQUE is a force created by the exploding gases in the cylinders driving the crankshaft to turn. Torque is increased by upping the force exerted on the pistons. Examples: higher c/r, larger displacement, forced induction.
Lightening a flywheel does not give any additional power gains when under load at constant rpm but it does give more power under transient condidtions because less power is required to accelerate the lower inertia flywheel. Having said that the biggest effect is felt under lower gears 1 & 2 where rpms accelerate faster, you can work out how much mass you have equivalently reduces from the vehicle if you know how much mass and where it was taken from.
A lightened flywheel often makes clutch engagement more difficult because the engine has less inertia and can be slowed easier which is why people often wrongly claim it lowers torque. When the clutch is fully engaged there is never less torque.89 E30 325is Lachs Silber - currently M20B31, M20B33 in the works, stroked to the hilt...
new build thread http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=317505
Comment
-
Originally posted by KenC View PostYou're describing inertia.'84 318i M10B18 147- Safari Beige
NA: 93whp/90ftlbs, MS2E w/ LC, 2-Step
Turbo: 221whp/214ftlbs, MS3x flex @ 17psi
Comment
Comment