Please read before u post stupid answers
-
-
i think you need to do the same thing. That same power could be put down with a chip on a stock ECU. You do not NEED bigger injectors, besides those are like $50 anyways. $40-50 for ECU, $100 for the head, it is definitely better than spending exponentially more for an M50 and a lot easier. Do some more research at least before you start talking out your ass.Originally posted by matt0300 View Post-AlexComment
-
Again ur talking about 88 eta bottom with 173 dme and 885 head with I intake and all that stuff. The dyno sheet u posted was running a standalone dme. Ur not gonna get 159whp from the setup u just posted.Comment
-
http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=182731 that's funny looks a lot similar to b25 stock whp. But again I'm talking out of my ass right?Comment
-
that is with flat top eta pistons. Its not a seta. It is pointless getting into this with you, clearly you do not know hte difference between the two.-AlexComment
-
I know what ur talking about. Just the cost to power isn't worth it. Ull spend x amount of dollars on that when u could have spent x amount of dollars on b25 and get more whp from the b25. Setas are great for Turbo but NA its just not worth it.Comment
-
And I am a little confused about what setas are now. I thought it was a eta bottom end with 885 head. Which was what that dyno chart was showing. The round pistons are 140mm long how do u get clearance? Cause b25 pistons are 135mm long. Ur valves would hit them if u just slapped on a 885 head right? Arguing or not I am curious about that cause Ive always been curious how they do that.Comment
-
Sorry mixup *connecting rods.Comment
-
You ARE a little confused. You come in talking shit but are clueless to what you're even saying.
The Super Eta was a 1988 only engine.
This discussion is over.Comment
Comment