Low Compression M20 Engine

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • QWKE30
    Banned
    • Oct 2009
    • 51

    #1

    Low Compression M20 Engine

    1989 325i 150k+ miles
    Manual transmission

    After a diagnosis of low compression I had a valve job done and changed the sparkplugs and we got a slight improvement.

    Original compression check =========== Compression check after work.
    Cylinder 1 110 =========== 1 120 9% gain
    Cylinder 2 110 =========== 2 110
    Cylinder 3 110 =========== 3 110
    Cylinder 4 105 =========== 4 110 5% gain
    Cylinder 5 105 =========== 5 110 5% gain
    Cylinder 6 105 =========== 6 115 10% gain

    What is the proper compression for this motor?
  • bmwstephen
    R3VLimited
    • May 2009
    • 2463

    #2
    supposedly 150 range but its very subjective. how did you do the compression testing? I assume the low but consitant numbers mean that while you were cranking for the test, you did not apply WOT

    Comment

    • QWKE30
      Banned
      • Oct 2009
      • 51

      #3
      My mechanic did it, he didn't say how.

      Comment

      • slammin.e28
        שמע ישראל
        • May 2010
        • 12054

        #4
        Ask.
        1974.5 Jensen Healey : 2003 330i/5

        Comment

        • QWKE30
          Banned
          • Oct 2009
          • 51

          #5
          wet

          Comment

          • ForcedFirebird
            R3V OG
            • Feb 2007
            • 8300

            #6
            Those numbers look fine for an engine with miles. Alldata says a new m20 should have 142-156psi with a maximum of 60% variance (lowest cylinder should be 60% or more of highest cylinder), engine warm, throttle open.
            john@m20guru.com
            Links:
            Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

            Comment

            • Jaxx_
              E30 Mastermind
              • Dec 2009
              • 1880

              #7
              Originally posted by ForcedFirebird
              Those numbers look fine for an engine with miles. Alldata says a new m20 should have 142-156psi with a maximum of 60% variance (lowest cylinder should be 60% or more of highest cylinder), engine warm, throttle open.
              60%? that seems a bit ridiculous.

              If the 2nd number is wet, looks like just a valve train issue -- I would do a valve adjustment and re-test. 110psi is rebuild territory for most motors.
              edit: yeah, I just saw that the 2nd number was after a valve adjustment. I would re-test with it wet and see if there is a vast improvement. if there is, rings are worn.


              I've never gotten a huge variance from throttle open and throttle closed. the motor is not spinning more than 300rpms anyways. Just to give you an idea -- megasquirt will ready about 97kpa when cranking before the car fires. Not exactly far off from full throttle. cyls fill with air pretty quick.


              edit #2: so were all the tests done wet? was the motor warm? I don't even understand the full testing procedure. Seems pretty stupid to just jump to putting oil in the combustion chamber to see what your compression numbers are.
              '84 318i M10B18 147- Safari Beige
              NA: 93whp/90ftlbs, MS2E w/ LC, 2-Step
              Turbo: 221whp/214ftlbs, MS3x flex @ 17psi

              Comment

              • ForcedFirebird
                R3V OG
                • Feb 2007
                • 8300

                #8
                Originally posted by Jaxx_
                60%? that seems a bit ridiculous.

                If the 2nd number is wet, looks like just a valve train issue -- I would do a valve adjustment and re-test. 110psi is rebuild territory for most motors.


                I've never gotten a huge variance from throttle open and throttle closed. the motor is not spinning more than 300rpms anyways. Just to give you an idea -- megasquirt will ready about 97kpa when cranking before the car fires. Not exactly far off from full throttle. cyls fill with air pretty quick.
                He had a valve job done, unless the lash was adjusted extremely wrong, it should be sealing.

                I have had several m20's in the shop with 110-120psi and run just fine (street/daily cars).

                Totally agree with you on the throttle plate, opening it only seems to make the needle go up faster with similar numbers in the end with it open/closed.

                As long as the cylinders are consistent, I don't follow alldata's 60%, I like to see less than 20% variance.

                It takes only 80psi cranking to make fuel combust BTW. I have seen an m20 running at 90-100psi on all 6 lol.
                john@m20guru.com
                Links:
                Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                Comment

                • Jaxx_
                  E30 Mastermind
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 1880

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ForcedFirebird
                  He had a valve job done, unless the lash was adjusted extremely wrong, it should be sealing.

                  I have had several m20's in the shop with 110-120psi and run just fine (street/daily cars).

                  Totally agree with you on the throttle plate, opening it only seems to make the needle go up faster with similar numbers in the end with it open/closed.

                  As long as the cylinders are consistent, I don't follow alldata's 60%, I like to see less than 20% variance.

                  It takes only 80psi cranking to make fuel combust BTW. I have seen an m20 running at 90-100psi on all 6 lol.
                  I agree with your post, but when the motor should be sitting at like 160+ from the factory (even these stone age motors) I wouldn't want to have 110psi. The good thing is that the motor has worn evenly but the truth is that even if a car runs fine it doesn't mean it's to it's full ability. For getting around town even an oil burning piece of shit will do.
                  '84 318i M10B18 147- Safari Beige
                  NA: 93whp/90ftlbs, MS2E w/ LC, 2-Step
                  Turbo: 221whp/214ftlbs, MS3x flex @ 17psi

                  Comment

                  • slammin.e28
                    שמע ישראל
                    • May 2010
                    • 12054

                    #10
                    I have an old Willys Jeep 4 banger and it has an even 30psi across all four cylinders.

                    It ran.

                    It also puked blue smoke, but it ran.
                    1974.5 Jensen Healey : 2003 330i/5

                    Comment

                    • ForcedFirebird
                      R3V OG
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 8300

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Jaxx_
                      I agree with your post, but when the motor should be sitting at like 160+ from the factory (even these stone age motors) I wouldn't want to have 110psi. The good thing is that the motor has worn evenly but the truth is that even if a car runs fine it doesn't mean it's to it's full ability. For getting around town even an oil burning piece of shit will do.
                      Factory manual states 156psi. I will stick with experience. These cars are old and have only seen ONE come in the shop that had 125 on 5 and 120 on one. If the OP is satisfied with a decent running car, I wouldn't say that a rebuild is req'd is all I meant.



                      Originally posted by slammin.e28guy
                      I have an old Willys Jeep 4 banger and it has an even 30psi across all four cylinders.

                      It ran.

                      It also puked blue smoke, but it ran.
                      lol. I have never seen anything run on that low cranking pressure. Have seen some low numbers with cams too big for the compression ratio, but never that low.
                      john@m20guru.com
                      Links:
                      Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                      Comment

                      • Jaxx_
                        E30 Mastermind
                        • Dec 2009
                        • 1880

                        #12
                        Originally posted by ForcedFirebird
                        Factory manual states 156psi. I will stick with experience. These cars are old and have only seen ONE come in the shop that had 125 on 5 and 120 on one. If the OP is satisfied with a decent running car, I wouldn't say that a rebuild is req'd is all I meant.
                        agree. I have ~145 across all 4 of my M10.
                        '84 318i M10B18 147- Safari Beige
                        NA: 93whp/90ftlbs, MS2E w/ LC, 2-Step
                        Turbo: 221whp/214ftlbs, MS3x flex @ 17psi

                        Comment

                        • digger
                          R3V Elite
                          • Nov 2005
                          • 5909

                          #13
                          i had 150psi +/-5 on all my stock B25 cylinders with 110k on the clock
                          89 E30 325is Lachs Silber - currently M20B31, M20B33 in the works, stroked to the hilt...

                          new build thread http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=317505

                          Comment

                          • Galactodactyl
                            Advanced Member
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 182

                            #14
                            142-156 PSI is what the Bentley manual says.

                            Last compression check I did was 164/155/160/128/155/155.

                            270k on the clock 89 325is.

                            Comment

                            Working...