The CPS is a passive (unpowered) inductive pickup. Frequency and amplitude of the generated voltage sine wave increase as engine RPMs increase. I don't know enough about electromagnetism to understand what problems would occur (if any), by using a part with a higher resistance.
The part numbers are the same for plastic vs metal housings - seems some manufacturers have started producing units with plastic housings, perhaps for durability/cost reasons. My initial part was Vemo (FAE?), the replacement (metal housing) was German made SWAG. Either I got a bad batch, someone can't read a spec sheet or it doesn't make a damned bit of difference. My engine certainly seems happier with the replacement unit installed.
Running both units via an oscilloscope and revving the engine would be an interesting exercise to see if there's any appreciable difference in output.
Part number I used is 12141720852. I'd be real interested to hear if swapping yours made any difference.
The part numbers are the same for plastic vs metal housings - seems some manufacturers have started producing units with plastic housings, perhaps for durability/cost reasons. My initial part was Vemo (FAE?), the replacement (metal housing) was German made SWAG. Either I got a bad batch, someone can't read a spec sheet or it doesn't make a damned bit of difference. My engine certainly seems happier with the replacement unit installed.
Running both units via an oscilloscope and revving the engine would be an interesting exercise to see if there's any appreciable difference in output.
Part number I used is 12141720852. I'd be real interested to hear if swapping yours made any difference.
Comment