Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eta 2.7 block with is 885 head question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    It sounds like I need to swap out my i manifold for an eta manifold on my 2.7i.
    I'm running a 230k eta bottom end, bimmerheads 274 cam, motronic 1.3, and full i exhaust. It already drives fantastic. If I can make even more power by simply swapping in an eta manifold, then I am absolutely going to do it.

    Comment


      #32
      So the eta intake on a franken 2.7i motor flows more than the i intake!?!?!? Even after 4,000 rpms???? I would ASSume it would just flow better down low

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View Post
        It's a very strong combination. You get more TQ than an eta, but the better breathing of the head and cam, so more HP to boot. It does choke a bit at the top end, drops off pretty rapidly at 6000 or so.
        Do you still have the graph lying around? Here's a quickie graph of mine I made today (no idea how accurate the numbers are, it's an app that uses the accelerometer on my phone along with weight, gearing, aerodynamics, weather ...) but it illustrates the torque characteristics nicely. How is it different with the eta manifold?

        Last edited by modernist; 10-14-2015, 06:00 PM. Reason: forgot pic >.<

        1986 327i
        transaction feedback
        DIY thing
        meh

        Comment


          #34
          The tq is definitely much nicer than just a b25

          Comment


            #35
            Bump. I need to know more about this

            Comment


              #36
              I'd be tempted to work on an eta head given the engine likes the small runner Intake manifold, on a engine that is sub 200bhp that is
              Last edited by digger; 10-15-2015, 11:35 PM.
              89 E30 325is Lachs Silber - currently M20B31, M20B33 in the works, stroked to the hilt...

              new build thread http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=317505

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by mikebloco View Post
                So the eta intake on a franken 2.7i motor flows more than the i intake!?!?!? Even after 4,000 rpms???? I would ASSume it would just flow better down low
                subscribed.. waiting for confirmation on this.

                Comment


                  #38
                  I am kinda curious about this as well.

                  I have 88 Super Eta I picked up from auction this month, and we were thinking of swapping one of my extra i intakes/TB/AFM/ECU/injectors on it.. Would like to see flow numbers or some sort of solid evidence.
                  1991 325i MT2 Touring (JDM bro)
                  2016 Ford Flex
                  2011 Audi A3 - wife's other German car

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by jayuuey View Post
                    subscribed.. waiting for confirmation on this.
                    Originally posted by djjerme View Post
                    I am kinda curious about this as well.

                    I have 88 Super Eta I picked up from auction this month, and we were thinking of swapping one of my extra i intakes/TB/AFM/ECU/injectors on it.. Would like to see flow numbers or some sort of solid evidence.
                    If you click my link above, we posted flow numbers for the eta, seta and i top ends.

                    No, the eta manifold does not flow better, but coupled with the 2.7i (flat pistons/885 head, eta manifold ported to accept the "i" throttle body), it gives more torque and power than a "i" manifold - but also, power drops more rapidly after 6000rpm than the "i" manifold on a 2.7i.
                    john@m20guru.com
                    Links:
                    Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by modernist View Post
                      Do you still have the graph lying around? Here's a quickie graph of mine I made today (no idea how accurate the numbers are, it's an app that uses the accelerometer on my phone along with weight, gearing, aerodynamics, weather ...) but it illustrates the torque characteristics nicely. How is it different with the eta manifold?
                      I have the WinPEP files from the dyno on my SD card - in which I left at the dyno during the last tuning session - won't get it back until I go back to tune another car, or am on that side of town.
                      john@m20guru.com
                      Links:
                      Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by ForcedFirebird
                        I have the WinPEP files from the dyno on my SD card - in which I left at the dyno during the last tuning session - won't get it back until I go back to tune another car, or am on that side of town.
                        Looking forward to it

                        1986 327i
                        transaction feedback
                        DIY thing
                        meh

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Extrude honing might be worth a shot.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            I'm in the middle of a 2.7i build right now and I never really take my car past 6k rpms any ways. I have a eta intake and an i intake so I might give this a shot.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View Post
                              If you click my link above, we posted flow numbers for the eta, seta and i top ends.

                              No, the eta manifold does not flow better, but coupled with the 2.7i (flat pistons/885 head, eta manifold ported to accept the "i" throttle body), it gives more torque and power than a "i" manifold - but also, power drops more rapidly after 6000rpm than the "i" manifold on a 2.7i.
                              Is the power drop described negligible when comparing the E to I intake manifold? With my current setup, e bottom full i top, there isn't much power after 6k anyways. The tq difference in your dyno results makes me want to swap manifolds right now!

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Can someone , or the op , tell me how the cluster swap works for 2.7i's?


                                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                                1986 LTW M52 (First project 2015- )
                                1998 e36 328ic/5 -
                                Roundie alpina pig cheek’d (1969)
                                1967 2002 parts car
                                1994 318iS junked.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X