Fuel Economy

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • imprttuner88
    Wrencher
    • Jun 2009
    • 293

    #1

    Fuel Economy

    I am in the search for a clean 4 door shell to turn into my DD project and am considering a multitude of stock engine swaps. I am looking for sporty, more power than the M20 but 100% stock save for exhaust and intake. What sort of real world MPG's are you guys seeing with the OEM BMW swaps?

    TIA
    1987 325i LeChump: H&R Race springs, weight reduction and beat to hell

    2005 Mazda RX8: Koni Yellows, Hotchkis FSB, 245 BFG Rivals RTR #11

    2011 Mazda CX7 Sport: The family truckster

    2001 Buick Park Ave: The DD grandpamobile

    1991 Ford F150 XLT 302: camping/towing
  • george graves
    I waste 90% of my day here and all I got was this stupid title
    • Oct 2003
    • 19986

    #2
    I've been curious about this as well....

    ....but didn't want to sound like a penny pincher - it's a bit odd to worry about gas mileage considering what this swap costs - so I'm glad you did! ;)
    Originally posted by Matt-B
    hey does anyone know anyone who gets upset and makes electronics?

    Comment

    • dirty30
      No R3VLimiter
      • Jul 2004
      • 3005

      #3
      I got 20 over the weekend driving through the mountains in WV. I've seen 22-24ish

      Comment

      • imprttuner88
        Wrencher
        • Jun 2009
        • 293

        #4
        Is that mixed use or just Highway?
        1987 325i LeChump: H&R Race springs, weight reduction and beat to hell

        2005 Mazda RX8: Koni Yellows, Hotchkis FSB, 245 BFG Rivals RTR #11

        2011 Mazda CX7 Sport: The family truckster

        2001 Buick Park Ave: The DD grandpamobile

        1991 Ford F150 XLT 302: camping/towing

        Comment

        • Northern
          R3V Elite
          • Nov 2010
          • 5056

          #5
          1990 325i/is seems to be rated 16/20MPG and a 2001 540i seems to be 14/21MPG... so in a lighter chassis, fuel mileage should be abysmal since all you're going to want to do are burnouts and powerslides.
          Originally posted by priapism
          My girl don't know shit, but she bakes a mean cupcake.
          Originally posted by shameson
          Usually it's best not to know how much money you have into your e30

          Comment

          • kevinbednarek
            Noobie
            • May 2012
            • 35

            #6
            My '84 M62 E30 got about 27mpg on my trip across the country with a passenger and a bunch of luggage. That's cruising about 85-90. Through the rockies I got about 23. But I was hauling ass.

            Comment

            • imprttuner88
              Wrencher
              • Jun 2009
              • 293

              #7
              That's damn impressive
              1987 325i LeChump: H&R Race springs, weight reduction and beat to hell

              2005 Mazda RX8: Koni Yellows, Hotchkis FSB, 245 BFG Rivals RTR #11

              2011 Mazda CX7 Sport: The family truckster

              2001 Buick Park Ave: The DD grandpamobile

              1991 Ford F150 XLT 302: camping/towing

              Comment

              • totheredline
                Mod Crazy
                • Jun 2013
                • 762

                #8
                Well heres what Im thinking, feel free to dispute this with me. = Part of the reason diesels get such good gas mileage is because of their good low end torque. Torque is what is needed to keep speed up on the highway, you don't need a lot of hp when cruising.
                A big torqueeey V8 is kinda the same deal, couple with the wonderfully light little buttercup E30 and there ya go.
                = Heidi 1988 325 -> 335i. 7200rpm built M30

                Comment

                • nando
                  Moderator
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 34827

                  #9
                  No, its because diesel has higher energy density.
                  Build thread

                  Bimmerlabs

                  Comment

                  • Ryann
                    No R3VLimiter
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 3350

                    #10
                    ^You've got it backwards. Torque translates into acceleration while horsepower translates into the ability to maintain a given speed.

                    Comment

                    • nando
                      Moderator
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 34827

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Ryann
                      ^You've got it backwards. Torque translates into acceleration while horsepower translates into the ability to maintain a given speed.
                      Thank you, yes!
                      Build thread

                      Bimmerlabs

                      Comment

                      • totheredline
                        Mod Crazy
                        • Jun 2013
                        • 762

                        #12
                        So diesels generate horsepower at lower RPMs and v8s kinda do the same thing?
                        = Heidi 1988 325 -> 335i. 7200rpm built M30

                        Comment

                        • nando
                          Moderator
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 34827

                          #13
                          yes they make more power at a low RPM but V8s do not get better fuel mileage than 4cylinders, do they?

                          the reason is energy density. a gallon of diesel simply contains more energy than gasoline. just like ethanol contains less energy than gasoline, and fuel economy drops by like half with E85.
                          Build thread

                          Bimmerlabs

                          Comment

                          • totheredline
                            Mod Crazy
                            • Jun 2013
                            • 762

                            #14
                            ^I get what you're saying about energy density. makes sense

                            Originally posted by nando
                            yes they make more power at a low RPM but V8s do not get better fuel mileage than 4cylinders, do they?
                            Well I think at a point it requires more fuel for a little baby 1.8l 4 to work its butt off to pull a car than it does for a larger displacement v8 to barley break a sweat pulling the same weight. Im just speaking hypothetically. No you're right though, a v8 normally wont get anywhere near the gas mileage of say an m42 engine car.
                            = Heidi 1988 325 -> 335i. 7200rpm built M30

                            Comment

                            • nando
                              Moderator
                              • Nov 2003
                              • 34827

                              #15
                              Nope - pumping losses. A 4cyl is still more efficient. Actually, an engine is more efficient at high load than with the throttle plate mostly closed, which decreases VE.
                              Build thread

                              Bimmerlabs

                              Comment

                              Working...