Camaro Shocks

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • einstein57
    replied
    You don't need to. You could cut a length of pipe and place it inside the strut tubes to take up the space. Maybe take the old inserts, cut off the bottom two inches in a chop saw, fill it up with sand and weld a disc to the top to seal it. Perfect fitting incompressible spacer that's cheap and lighter then a solid metal spacer. Just spit balling for those who don't want to go low. When you chop it even the highest setting will be around h&r races.

    Leave a comment:


  • graphikg
    replied
    ^^^ ya. Maybe about 1-1.5 inches.

    Leave a comment:


  • ohthejosh
    replied
    Originally posted by einstein57
    No. I used the rears. They are only 2" shorter compared to 4" like the fronts.
    If i was to use the MR2 strut inserts with your coilover kit i need to shorten the strut housing right?

    Leave a comment:


  • einstein57
    replied
    No. I used the rears. They are only 2" shorter compared to 4" like the fronts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Teaguer
    replied
    Originally posted by AE86
    I think you meant MR2 fronts, no?
    Mr2 rears.

    Leave a comment:


  • AE86
    replied
    Originally posted by einstein57
    Took a gander and some measurements of the MR2 rears.
    I think you meant MR2 fronts, no?

    Leave a comment:


  • AE86
    replied
    If anyone is interested in buying these, there is a guy on club4ag forums that sells the SW20/"MR2" (front) and Camaro (rear) set-up for $355. Here's a link, BTW no affiliation.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnwoo
    replied
    hey einstein do you have a part number for the mr2 struts?

    Leave a comment:


  • taiden
    replied
    Originally posted by Teaguer
    Bilsteins are inverted design. Derp!
    Oh my, they say you learn something new every day. Apparently they were wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • einstein57
    replied
    Just put them on the stiffest setting and they are retarded. With my entire 200lbs of mass pressing down it took about 5 seconds to fully compress. About 4 seconds longer then the rears and i can't even pull the shaft. It just won't budge. The valving difference between the front and rear is extreme. The only thing i can can compare the fronts to are truck shocks. If you want to drive with your oil pan skimming the ground a pair of these and some will make sure your front end goes nowhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • Teaguer
    replied
    Originally posted by taiden
    The difference in shaft diameter is pretty substantial. Not that it has to do with anything, I just notice it right off.
    Bilsteins are inverted design. Derp!

    Leave a comment:


  • taiden
    replied
    The difference in shaft diameter is pretty substantial. Not that it has to do with anything, I just notice it right off.

    Leave a comment:


  • einstein57
    replied
    Took a gander and some measurements of the MR2 rears. All and all these definitely feel stiffer in both compression and rebound then the Bilstein IX HDs although i feel its an unfare comparison since the are pretty damn beat. The MR2 gland nuts have the same thread pitch as the Bilsteins but the are a couple thousandths of a inch smaller. The Bilstein measured in at 1.8815" and the MR2 was 1.8795". I don't think its enough to make a difference but i'm going to wrap it in teflon tape just to be on the side of caution. The strut body was also a bit narrower as the Bilstein measured in at 45.35mm and the KYB was 43.65mm. The gland nut centers it so I don't believe it will be a problem. I plan on making a sleeve for the bottom to center it as well. I'm sure its overkill because the g60 inserts are narrower as well and people just wrap them in hockey tape. Another interesting comparison is even though KYB is an inch longer then the Bilstein they are the same length when they are compressed. This is great for people who don't want to be slammed but want a thrifty alternative to Koni sports.


    Leave a comment:


  • E30_fiend
    replied
    Originally posted by einstein57
    Bilstein sport compression rates are to high for your spring rates. The rebound is not high enough which is what makes them a little bouncy. So if the AGX have a softer compression but allow rebound adjustment then thats exactly what we need for springs that are comparable to H&R races or stiffer.
    Was this directed toward me?

    My rates are much higher than H&R race. 600fr and 750rr. After driving it more, I feel like what I am feeling/hearing is a stiff bounce rather than a soft bounce. I hope that makes sense. I realize that the side effects of a stiff shock sometimes feels like the effects of a soft shock. I think the camaro shocks allowed the trailing arm to compress more before compression was reached. I noticed that I had to jack the rear up more in order to get the bolt onto the trailing arm. That makes me think the shocks may need to compress a bit more than the sports, to hit that sweet spot of its dampening design.

    All in all, I DO like them. I may play with the knob and see if I like a different setting better than 8.


    Taylor

    Leave a comment:


  • go3go
    replied
    ^so are you going to run kyb's up front too?

    Leave a comment:

Working...